Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中Veress针穿刺入路与直接套管针穿刺入路术后疼痛、恶心及呕吐的比较

The Comparison of Postoperative Pain, Nausea, and Vomiting between Veress Needle Entry and Direct Trocar Entry Methods in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Toolabi Karamollah, Elyasinia Fezzeh, Taftian Ensieh, Sadeghian Ehsan, Soroush Ahmad Reza

机构信息

Department Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Department of Surgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Middle East J Dig Dis. 2021 Jan;13(1):54-60. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2021.204. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting are the most common side effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In the present study, we investigated the differences in postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting between Veress needle and direct trocar entry methods among patients undergoing LC. METHODS 96 patients with gallstones were studied. They were randomly divided into two groups: the patients in the first group (n = 48) were insufflated 8.1 liters per minute CO gas by direct trocar port, and the patients in another group (n = 48) were insufflated 2.1 liters per minute CO gas by Veress needle. Pain intensity, nausea, and vomiting were assessed at 20 minutes, 4 hours, and 12 hours after the operations. RESULTS The duration of CO gas insufflation in Veress needle was 88.7 ± 10.7 seconds and indirect trocar was 16.6 ± 1.6 seconds. Visual analog scale (VAS) score significantly reduced in Veress needle compared with direct trocar (0.39 ± 0.98 vs. 1.68 ± 1.48) at 20 min after the operation, while there was no difference at 4 hours and 12 hours after the operation. The requirement and dose of pethidine injection were significantly lower in Veress needle than direct trocar. In addition, nausea and vomiting occurred in Veress needle less than direct trocar at 20 min, 4 hours, and 12 hours after LC. CONCLUSION Pain intensity just in the short term after LC in the group with CO gas insufflation in Veress needle was significantly less than the other group, while nausea and vomiting were significantly less during the whole follow-up periods in the group with CO gas insufflation in Veress needle.

摘要

背景

术后疼痛、恶心和呕吐是腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)最常见的副作用。在本研究中,我们调查了接受LC的患者中,Veress针穿刺法和直接套管针穿刺法在术后疼痛、恶心和呕吐方面的差异。

方法

对96例胆结石患者进行研究。他们被随机分为两组:第一组(n = 48)通过直接套管针端口以每分钟8.1升的速度注入CO气体,另一组(n = 48)通过Veress针以每分钟2.1升的速度注入CO气体。在术后20分钟、4小时和12小时评估疼痛强度、恶心和呕吐情况。

结果

Veress针注入CO气体的持续时间为88.7±10.7秒,间接套管针为16.6±1.6秒。术后20分钟时,Veress针组的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分显著低于直接套管针组(0.39±0.98 vs. 1.68±1.48),而术后4小时和12小时时无差异。Veress针组哌替啶注射的需求和剂量显著低于直接套管针组。此外,在LC术后20分钟、4小时和12小时,Veress针组恶心和呕吐的发生率低于直接套管针组。

结论

在LC术后短期内,采用Veress针注入CO气体组的疼痛强度明显低于另一组,而在整个随访期间,采用Veress针注入CO气体组的恶心和呕吐明显较少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f689/8531939/94df096dd3d5/mejdd-13-54-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验