• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在玩《花火》时合作印象与自我评估、思考时间以及风险敏感性一致性的出现。

Emergence of Cooperative Impression With Self-Estimation, Thinking Time, and Concordance of Risk Sensitivity in Playing Hanabi.

作者信息

Osawa Hirotaka, Kawagoe Atsushi, Sato Eisuke, Kato Takuya

机构信息

Human-Agent Interaction Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering, Information and Systems, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

Human-Agent Interaction Laboratory, Graduate School of Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2021 Oct 12;8:658348. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.658348. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/frobt.2021.658348
PMID:34712700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8547271/
Abstract

The authors evaluate the extent to which a user's impression of an AI agent can be improved by giving the agent the ability of self-estimation, thinking time, and coordination of risk tendency. The authors modified the algorithm of an AI agent in the cooperative game Hanabi to have all of these traits, and investigated the change in the user's impression by playing with the user. The authors used a self-estimation task to evaluate the effect that the ability to read the intention of a user had on an impression. The authors also show thinking time of an agent influences impression for an agent. The authors also investigated the relationship between the concordance of the risk-taking tendencies of players and agents, the player's impression of agents, and the game experience. The results of the self-estimation task experiment showed that the more accurate the estimation of the agent's self, the more likely it is that the partner will perceive humanity, affinity, intelligence, and communication skills in the agent. The authors also found that an agent that changes the length of thinking time according to the priority of action gives the impression that it is smarter than an agent with a normal thinking time when the player notices the difference in thinking time or an agent that randomly changes the thinking time. The result of the experiment regarding concordance of the risk-taking tendency shows that influence player's impression toward agents. These results suggest that game agent designers can improve the player's disposition toward an agent and the game experience by adjusting the agent's self-estimation level, thinking time, and risk-taking tendency according to the player's personality and inner state during the game.

摘要

作者评估了赋予人工智能代理自我评估能力、思考时间和风险倾向协调能力,在多大程度上可以改善用户对该代理的印象。作者修改了合作游戏《璀璨宝石》中人工智能代理的算法,使其具备所有这些特质,并通过与用户一起玩游戏来研究用户印象的变化。作者使用自我评估任务来评估读取用户意图的能力对印象的影响。作者还表明,代理的思考时间会影响对该代理的印象。作者还研究了玩家与代理的冒险倾向一致性、玩家对代理的印象以及游戏体验之间的关系。自我评估任务实验的结果表明,代理对自身的评估越准确,伙伴就越有可能在该代理中感知到人性、亲和力、智慧和沟通技巧。作者还发现,当玩家注意到思考时间的差异时,根据行动优先级改变思考时间长度的代理,会给人比思考时间正常的代理或随机改变思考时间的代理更聪明的印象。关于冒险倾向一致性的实验结果表明,这会影响玩家对代理的印象。这些结果表明,游戏代理设计师可以通过根据玩家在游戏中的个性和内心状态调整代理的自我评估水平、思考时间和冒险倾向,来改善玩家对代理的态度和游戏体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/1e433476cd1e/frobt-08-658348-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/399e105c619c/frobt-08-658348-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/114547cb8467/frobt-08-658348-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/b1c235f175ad/frobt-08-658348-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/ad8bac322ec2/frobt-08-658348-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/662a0927db15/frobt-08-658348-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/d463f9e58286/frobt-08-658348-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/61d6f200a098/frobt-08-658348-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/1e433476cd1e/frobt-08-658348-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/399e105c619c/frobt-08-658348-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/114547cb8467/frobt-08-658348-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/b1c235f175ad/frobt-08-658348-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/ad8bac322ec2/frobt-08-658348-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/662a0927db15/frobt-08-658348-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/d463f9e58286/frobt-08-658348-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/61d6f200a098/frobt-08-658348-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedf/8547271/1e433476cd1e/frobt-08-658348-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Emergence of Cooperative Impression With Self-Estimation, Thinking Time, and Concordance of Risk Sensitivity in Playing Hanabi.在玩《花火》时合作印象与自我评估、思考时间以及风险敏感性一致性的出现。
Front Robot AI. 2021 Oct 12;8:658348. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.658348. eCollection 2021.
2
User Experience With Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment Methods for an Affective Exergame: Comparative Laboratory-Based Study.情感运动游戏动态难度调整方法的用户体验:基于实验室的比较研究。
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 May 31;9(2):e25771. doi: 10.2196/25771.
3
AlphaDDA: strategies for adjusting the playing strength of a fully trained AlphaZero system to a suitable human training partner.AlphaDDA:将完全训练好的AlphaZero系统的游戏强度调整到适合人类训练伙伴的策略。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Oct 4;8:e1123. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1123. eCollection 2022.
4
Adapting conversational strategies in information-giving human-agent interaction.在信息提供型人机交互中调整对话策略。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Oct 25;5:1029340. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.1029340. eCollection 2022.
5
Experiences of Game-Based Learning and Reviewing History of the Experience Using Player's Emotions.基于游戏的学习体验以及利用玩家情感回顾该体验的历史。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Jul 15;5:874106. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.874106. eCollection 2022.
6
A System of Emotion Recognition and Judgment and Its Application in Adaptive Interactive Game.情感识别与判断系统及其在自适应互动游戏中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 19;23(6):3250. doi: 10.3390/s23063250.
7
Do aggressive people play violent computer games in a more aggressive way? Individual difference and idiosyncratic game-playing experience.好斗的人玩暴力电脑游戏时会更具攻击性吗?个体差异与独特的游戏体验。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Apr;11(2):157-61. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0026.
8
Using a Stochastic Agent Model to Optimize Performance in Divergent Interest Tacit Coordination Games.使用随机主体模型优化分歧兴趣默契协调博弈中的表现。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 8;20(24):7026. doi: 10.3390/s20247026.
9
Effects of playing video games on perceptions of one's humanity.玩视频游戏对人类感知的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jul-Aug;153(4):499-514. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2013.768593.
10
Effects of the Skills4Genius sports-based training program in creative behavior.Skills4Genius基于运动的训练计划对创造性行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0172520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172520. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
ATTRACTION AS A LINEAR FUNCTION OF PROPORTION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTS.吸引力作为积极强化比例的线性函数。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1965 Jun;1:659-63. doi: 10.1037/h0022073.
2
Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.乐观、应对与健康:一般结果预期的评估及其影响
Health Psychol. 1985;4(3):219-47. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.4.3.219.