• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向开放研究平台转型:社区调查结果

Converting to an open research platform: community survey results.

作者信息

Howat Alexandra M, Clark Justin

机构信息

Microbiology Society, London, UK.

出版信息

Access Microbiol. 2021 Sep 7;3(9):000272. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000272. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1099/acmi.0.000272
PMID:34712910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8549388/
Abstract

Following the Microbiology Society's successful bid for a Learned Society Curation Award from the Wellcome Trust and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Society is converting our sound science, open access journal, , to an open research platform. As part of this, we conducted a survey of our community to gauge current attitudes towards the platform and here we present some of these results. The majority of respondents (57 %) said they would always or sometimes want to remain anonymous on their peer review report, whilst 75 % of respondents said that as an author they would be happy to make the data underlying their research open. There was a clear desire for a range of research types that are often seen with sound science publications and rigorous research. An encouraging 94 % of respondents stated that the platform is somewhere they would consider publishing, demonstrating the enthusiasm in these respondents for a new publishing platform for their community. Given this data and that from our previous focus group research, the platform will launch as outlined in the original project proposal and adopt a transparent peer review model with an open data policy.

摘要

在微生物学会成功获得惠康信托基金会和霍华德·休斯医学研究所颁发的学术协会管理奖之后,该学会正在将我们的严谨科学、开放获取期刊《》转变为一个开放研究平台。作为其中一部分,我们对学会社群进行了一项调查,以了解当前对该平台的态度,在此我们展示其中一些结果。大多数受访者(57%)表示,他们在同行评审报告上总是或有时希望保持匿名,而75%的受访者表示,作为作者,他们愿意公开其研究的基础数据。对于一系列在严谨科学出版物和严格研究中常见的研究类型,存在明显的需求。令人鼓舞的是,94%的受访者表示该平台是他们会考虑发表文章的地方,这表明这些受访者对为其社群打造的新出版平台充满热情。鉴于这些数据以及我们之前焦点小组研究的数据,该平台将按原项目提案概述的那样推出,并采用具有开放数据政策的透明同行评审模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/9e5604861e46/acmi-3-0272-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/a70dfbbc21ee/acmi-3-0272-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/2de10dba8257/acmi-3-0272-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/6a43407a388d/acmi-3-0272-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/c109929f19e7/acmi-3-0272-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/6a084c51bf0f/acmi-3-0272-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/5ddbbbc75fde/acmi-3-0272-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/2995b5bd552e/acmi-3-0272-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/9e5604861e46/acmi-3-0272-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/a70dfbbc21ee/acmi-3-0272-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/2de10dba8257/acmi-3-0272-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/6a43407a388d/acmi-3-0272-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/c109929f19e7/acmi-3-0272-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/6a084c51bf0f/acmi-3-0272-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/5ddbbbc75fde/acmi-3-0272-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/2995b5bd552e/acmi-3-0272-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/215e/8549388/9e5604861e46/acmi-3-0272-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Converting to an open research platform: community survey results.向开放研究平台转型:社区调查结果
Access Microbiol. 2021 Sep 7;3(9):000272. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000272. eCollection 2021.
2
Converting to an open research platform: focus group and AI review tool research results.向开放研究平台的转变:焦点小组和人工智能评审工具研究结果
Access Microbiol. 2021 Apr 19;3(4):000232. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000232. eCollection 2021.
3
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.一个学术团体对出版的看法。
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
4
[The different models of scientific journals].[科学期刊的不同模式]
Med Trop Sante Int. 2023 Dec 8;3(4). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v3i4.2023.454. eCollection 2023 Dec 31.
5
Towards an open science publishing platform.迈向一个开放科学出版平台。
F1000Res. 2016 Feb 3;5:130. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7968.1. eCollection 2016.
6
Researchers support preprints and open access publishing, but with reservations: A questionnaire survey of MBSJ members.研究人员支持预印本和开放获取出版,但有保留意见:对 MBSJ 成员的问卷调查。
Genes Cells. 2023 May;28(5):333-337. doi: 10.1111/gtc.13015. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
7
Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions.开放获取出版与作者付费商业模式:作者知识与认知调查
J R Soc Med. 2006 Mar;99(3):141-8. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900316.
8
Celebrating 20 Years of Open Access and Innovation at JMIR Publications.庆祝JMIR出版物开放获取与创新20周年。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 23;21(12):e17578. doi: 10.2196/17578.
9
Predatory publishing or a lack of peer review transparency?-a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in paediatric urology.掠夺性出版还是缺乏同行评审透明度?-小儿泌尿外科索引开放和非开放获取文章的当代分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Apr;15(2):159.e1-159.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.019. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
10
Preprints as a driver of open science: Opportunities for Southeast Asia.预印本作为开放科学的驱动力:东南亚的机遇。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Sep 26;7:992942. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.992942. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review.预印本在卫生和社会保健环境中的使用和可接受性:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 15;18(9):e0291627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291627. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Converting to an open research platform: focus group and AI review tool research results.向开放研究平台的转变:焦点小组和人工智能评审工具研究结果
Access Microbiol. 2021 Apr 19;3(4):000232. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000232. eCollection 2021.
2
Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution.在一些期刊中,招募审稿人变得越来越困难:对生态学和进化领域六本期刊审稿人疲劳影响的一项测试。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Mar 8;2:3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0027-x. eCollection 2017.