• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究人员支持预印本和开放获取出版,但有保留意见:对 MBSJ 成员的问卷调查。

Researchers support preprints and open access publishing, but with reservations: A questionnaire survey of MBSJ members.

机构信息

Division of Scientific Information and Public Policy, Center for Infectious Disease Education and Research (CiDER), Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

Research Center on Ethical, Legal and Social Issues, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Genes Cells. 2023 May;28(5):333-337. doi: 10.1111/gtc.13015. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1111/gtc.13015
PMID:36876468
Abstract

Since the 1990s, journals have become increasingly online and open access. In fact, about 50% of articles published in 2021 were open access. The use of preprints (i.e., non-peer-reviewed articles) has also increased. However, there is limited awareness of these concepts among academics. Therefore, we conducted a questionnaire-based survey among members of the Molecular Biology Society of Japan. The survey was conducted between September 2022 and October 2022, with 633 respondents, 500 of whom (79.0%) were faculty members. In total, 478 (76.6%) respondents had published articles as open access, and 571 (91.5%) wanted to publish their articles in open access. Although 540 (86.5%) respondents knew about preprints, only 183 (33.9%) had posted preprints before. In the open-ended section of the questionnaire survey, several comments were made about the cost burdens associated with open access and the difficulty of how academic preprints are handled. Although open access is widespread, and recognition of preprints is increasing, some issues remain that need to be addressed. Academic and institutional support, and transformative agreement may help reduce the cost burden. Guidelines for handling preprints in academia are also important for responding to changes in the research environment.

摘要

自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,期刊越来越倾向于在线和开放获取。事实上,2021 年发表的文章约有 50%是开放获取的。预印本(即未经同行评审的文章)的使用也有所增加。然而,学术界对这些概念的认识有限。因此,我们在日本分子生物学学会成员中进行了一项基于问卷调查的调查。调查于 2022 年 9 月至 10 月进行,共有 633 名受访者,其中 500 名(79.0%)为教职员工。共有 478 名(76.6%)受访者以开放获取的方式发表过文章,571 名(91.5%)希望以开放获取的方式发表文章。虽然 540 名受访者(86.5%)知道预印本,但只有 183 名(33.9%)之前发布过预印本。在问卷调查的开放式部分,有几个评论提到了开放获取相关的成本负担以及学术预印本处理的困难。尽管开放获取已经很普遍,而且对预印本的认识也在增加,但仍有一些问题需要解决。学术和机构支持以及变革性协议可能有助于减轻成本负担。处理学术界预印本的指南对于应对研究环境的变化也很重要。

相似文献

1
Researchers support preprints and open access publishing, but with reservations: A questionnaire survey of MBSJ members.研究人员支持预印本和开放获取出版,但有保留意见:对 MBSJ 成员的问卷调查。
Genes Cells. 2023 May;28(5):333-337. doi: 10.1111/gtc.13015. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
2
Open access and predatory publishing: a survey of the publishing practices of academic pharmacists and nurses in the United States.开放获取和掠夺性出版:对美国药学和护理学术人员出版实践的调查。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jul 1;110(3):294-305. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1377.
3
Scholarly publishing and journal targeting in the time of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of rheumatologists and other specialists.在 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行时期的学术出版和期刊定位:风湿病学家和其他专家的横断面调查。
Rheumatol Int. 2020 Dec;40(12):2023-2030. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04718-x. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
Celebrating 20 Years of Open Access and Innovation at JMIR Publications.庆祝JMIR出版物开放获取与创新20周年。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 23;21(12):e17578. doi: 10.2196/17578.
5
Adjusting the use of preprints to accommodate the 'quality' factor in response to COVID-19.调整预印本的使用,以应对新冠疫情,适应“质量”因素。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021 May 29;16(4):477-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2021.04.003. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals.假金:安全浏览开放获取出版以避免掠夺性出版商和期刊。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr;74(4):809-817. doi: 10.1111/jan.13483. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
7
The experiences of COVID-19 preprint authors: a survey of researchers about publishing and receiving feedback on their work during the pandemic.COVID-19 预印本作者的体验:一项关于研究人员在大流行期间发表论文和接收反馈的调查。
PeerJ. 2023 Aug 22;11:e15864. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15864. eCollection 2023.
8
Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic.关于 COVID-19 大流行的学术出版物、预印本和注册临床试验的特征。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 6;15(10):e0240123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240123. eCollection 2020.
9
Preprints as a driver of open science: Opportunities for Southeast Asia.预印本作为开放科学的驱动力:东南亚的机遇。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Sep 26;7:992942. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.992942. eCollection 2022.
10
WASP: Is open access publishing the way forward? A review of the different ways in which research papers can be published.WASP:开放获取出版是未来的发展方向吗?对研究论文可采用的不同出版方式的综述。
Early Hum Dev. 2018 Jun;121:54-57. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Japan's push to make all research open access is taking shape.日本推动所有研究实现开放获取的举措正在成形。
Nature. 2024 May 30. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-01493-8.
2
Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine researchers' practices and perceived barriers related to open science: An international, cross-sectional survey.补充、替代和整合医学研究人员与开放科学相关的实践和感知障碍:一项国际、横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2024 May 6;19(5):e0301251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301251. eCollection 2024.