• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

莫达非尼的自发在线患者体验:一项定性与自然语言处理分析

Spontaneously Generated Online Patient Experience of Modafinil: A Qualitative and NLP Analysis.

作者信息

Walsh Julia, Cave Jonathan, Griffiths Frances

机构信息

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2021 Feb 17;3:598431. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.598431. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2021.598431
PMID:34713085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8521895/
Abstract

To compare the findings from a qualitative and a natural language processing (NLP) based analysis of online patient experience posts on patient experience of the effectiveness and impact of the drug Modafinil. Posts ( = 260) from 5 online social media platforms where posts were publicly available formed the dataset/corpus. Three platforms asked posters to give a numerical rating of Modafinil. Thematic analysis: data was coded and themes generated. Data were categorized into PreModafinil, Acquisition, Dosage, and PostModafinil and compared to identify each poster's own view of whether taking Modafinil was linked to an identifiable outcome. We classified this as positive, mixed, negative, or neutral and compared this with numerical ratings. NLP: Corpus text was speech tagged and keywords and key terms extracted. We identified the following entities: drug names, condition names, symptoms, actions, and side-effects. We searched for simple relationships, collocations, and co-occurrences of entities. To identify causal text, we split the corpus into PreModafinil and PostModafinil and used n-gram analysis. To evaluate sentiment, we calculated the polarity of each post between -1 (negative) and +1 (positive). NLP results were mapped to qualitative results. Posters had used Modafinil for 33 different primary conditions. Eight themes were identified: the reason for taking (condition or symptom), impact of symptoms, acquisition, dosage, side effects, other interventions tried or compared to, effectiveness of Modafinil, and quality of life outcomes. Posters reported perceived effectiveness as follows: 68% positive, 12% mixed, 18% negative. Our classification was consistent with poster ratings. Of the most frequent 100 keywords/keyterms identified by term extraction 88/100 keywords and 84/100 keyterms mapped directly to the eight themes. Seven keyterms indicated negation and temporal states. Sentiment was as follows 72% positive sentiment 4% neutral 24% negative. Matching of sentiment between the qualitative and NLP methods was accurate in 64.2% of posts. If we allow for one category difference matching was accurate in 85% of posts. User generated patient experience is a rich resource for evaluating real world effectiveness, understanding patient perspectives, and identifying research gaps. Both methods successfully identified the entities and topics contained in the posts. In contrast to current evidence, posters with a wide range of other conditions found Modafinil effective. Perceived causality and effectiveness were identified by both methods demonstrating the potential to augment existing knowledge.

摘要

为比较基于定性分析和自然语言处理(NLP)对在线患者体验帖子中有关莫达非尼药物有效性和影响的患者体验的研究结果。来自5个在线社交媒体平台且帖子可公开获取的260篇帖子构成了数据集/语料库。三个平台要求发帖者对莫达非尼给出数字评分。主题分析:对数据进行编码并生成主题。数据被分类为服用莫达非尼前、获取、剂量和服用莫达非尼后,并进行比较以确定每位发帖者对于服用莫达非尼是否与可识别结果相关的个人观点。我们将其分类为积极、混合、消极或中性,并与数字评分进行比较。NLP:对语料库文本进行语音标注并提取关键词和关键术语。我们识别出以下实体:药物名称、病症名称、症状、行为和副作用。我们搜索实体之间的简单关系、搭配和共现情况。为识别因果文本,我们将语料库分为服用莫达非尼前和服用莫达非尼后,并使用n元语法分析。为评估情感倾向,我们计算每篇帖子在-1(消极)到+1(积极)之间的极性。将NLP结果映射到定性结果上。发帖者将莫达非尼用于33种不同的主要病症。识别出八个主题:服用原因(病症或症状)、症状影响、获取、剂量、副作用、尝试过或与之比较的其他干预措施、莫达非尼的有效性以及生活质量结果。发帖者报告的感知有效性如下:68%为积极,12%为混合,18%为消极。我们的分类与发帖者评分一致。在通过术语提取识别出的最常见的100个关键词/关键术语中,88/100个关键词和84/100个关键术语直接映射到八个主题。七个关键术语表示否定和时间状态。情感倾向如下:72%为积极情感,4%为中性,24%为消极。定性和NLP方法之间的情感倾向匹配在64.2%的帖子中是准确的。如果允许有一个类别差异,匹配在85%的帖子中是准确的。用户生成的患者体验是评估现实世界有效性、理解患者观点和识别研究差距的丰富资源。两种方法都成功识别出了帖子中包含的实体和主题。与当前证据相反 的是,患有多种其他病症的发帖者发现莫达非尼有效。两种方法都识别出了感知到的因果关系和有效性,显示出扩充现有知识的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd9/8521895/3c0bded8ddd3/fdgth-03-598431-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd9/8521895/3c0bded8ddd3/fdgth-03-598431-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd9/8521895/3c0bded8ddd3/fdgth-03-598431-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Spontaneously Generated Online Patient Experience of Modafinil: A Qualitative and NLP Analysis.莫达非尼的自发在线患者体验:一项定性与自然语言处理分析
Front Digit Health. 2021 Feb 17;3:598431. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.598431. eCollection 2021.
2
Determination of Patient Sentiment and Emotion in Ophthalmology: Infoveillance Tutorial on Web-Based Health Forum Discussions.眼科患者情绪的测定:基于网络健康论坛讨论的 Infoveillance 教程。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 17;23(5):e20803. doi: 10.2196/20803.
3
Educational and Emotional Needs of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes: An AI Analysis of Multi-Country Social Media.骨髓增生异常综合征患者的教育和情感需求:多国社交媒体的人工智能分析。
Adv Ther. 2023 Jan;40(1):159-173. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02277-0. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
4
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Online Communications on Statins, Memory, and Cognition: Qualitative Analysis Using Online Communities.在线交流中关于他汀类药物、记忆和认知的患者报告结局:利用在线社区进行的定性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 28;21(11):e14809. doi: 10.2196/14809.
5
Differing Content and Language Based on Poster-Patient Relationships on the Chinese Social Media Platform Weibo: Text Classification, Sentiment Analysis, and Topic Modeling of Posts on Breast Cancer.中国社交媒体平台微博上基于海报与患者关系的内容及语言差异:乳腺癌相关帖子的文本分类、情感分析与主题建模
JMIR Cancer. 2024 May 9;10:e51332. doi: 10.2196/51332.
6
Models of Gender Dysphoria Using Social Media Data for Use in Technology-Delivered Interventions: Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing Validation Study.利用社交媒体数据构建性别焦虑模型以用于技术驱动干预:机器学习与自然语言处理验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 16;7:e47256. doi: 10.2196/47256.
7
Understanding Pediatric Experiences With Symptomatic Varicoceles: Mixed Methods Study of an Online Varicocele Community.理解小儿精索静脉曲张症状的体验:精索静脉曲张在线社区的混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 10;8:e50141. doi: 10.2196/50141.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Using natural language processing to understand, facilitate and maintain continuity in patient experience across transitions of care.利用自然语言处理技术,理解、促进并维持患者在医疗护理交接过程中的体验的连续性。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Jan;157:104642. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104642. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
10
An exploratory content and sentiment analysis of the guardian metaverse articles using leximancer and natural language processing.使用Leximancer和自然语言处理技术对《卫报》元宇宙文章进行探索性的内容和情感分析。
J Big Data. 2023;10(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40537-023-00773-w. Epub 2023 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Opinion Mining of Erowid's Experience Reports on LSD and Psilocybin-Containing Mushrooms.对Erowid网站上关于LSD和含裸盖菇素蘑菇的体验报告的观点挖掘
Drug Saf. 2025 May;48(5):559-575. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01530-z. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
2
Combining Topic Modeling, Sentiment Analysis, and Corpus Linguistics to Analyze Unstructured Web-Based Patient Experience Data: Case Study of Modafinil Experiences.结合主题建模、情感分析和语料库语言学来分析基于网络的非结构化患者体验数据:莫达非尼体验的案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 11;26:e54321. doi: 10.2196/54321.
3
Comparison of the Erectile Dysfunction Drugs Sildenafil and Tadalafil Using Patient Medication Reviews: Topic Modeling Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics and Privacy in Social Media Research for Mental Health.社交媒体在精神健康研究中的伦理与隐私问题
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Nov 23;22(12):84. doi: 10.1007/s11920-020-01205-9.
2
Sentiment Analysis in Health and Well-Being: Systematic Review.健康与幸福中的情感分析:系统综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jan 28;8(1):e16023. doi: 10.2196/16023.
3
Health Researchers' Use of Social Media: Scoping Review.健康研究人员对社交媒体的使用:范围综述
使用患者用药评价对勃起功能障碍药物西地那非和他达拉非进行比较:主题建模研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Feb 28;10(2):e32689. doi: 10.2196/32689.
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 13;21(11):e13687. doi: 10.2196/13687.
4
Understanding Public Attitudes Toward Researchers Using Social Media for Detecting and Monitoring Adverse Events Data: Multi Methods Study.了解公众对研究人员使用社交媒体检测和监测不良事件数据的态度:多方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 29;21(8):e7081. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7081.
5
A systematic review of natural language processing and text mining of symptoms from electronic patient-authored text data.基于电子患者自报告文本数据的症状自然语言处理和文本挖掘的系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 May;125:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
6
A systematic literature review of machine learning in online personal health data.机器学习在在线个人健康数据中的系统文献综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Jun 1;26(6):561-576. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz009.
7
Mining social networks to improve suicide prevention: A scoping review.挖掘社交网络以改善自杀预防:范围综述。
J Neurosci Res. 2020 Apr;98(4):616-625. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24404. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
8
Digital Trespass: Ethical and Terms-of-Use Violations by Researchers Accessing Data From an Online Patient Community.数字侵权:研究人员从在线患者社区获取数据时的伦理及使用条款违规行为
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 21;21(2):e11985. doi: 10.2196/11985.
9
The usefulness of listening social media for pharmacovigilance purposes: a systematic review.倾听社交媒体在药物警戒方面的作用:一项系统评价。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;17(11):1081-1093. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1531847. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
10
Inverting the patient involvement paradigm: defining patient led research.颠覆患者参与模式:定义患者主导的研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Jul 10;4:21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0104-4. eCollection 2018.