• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字肌肉骨骼(MSK)项目中老年人按代际划分的使用情况及结果

Older Adult Use and Outcomes in a Digital Musculoskeletal (MSK) Program, by Generation.

作者信息

Wang Grace, Bailey Jeannie F, Yang Manshu, Krauss Jeffrey

机构信息

Director of Clinical Research, Hinge Health, Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2021 Aug 3;3:693170. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.693170. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2021.693170
PMID:34713170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8521841/
Abstract

We investigated use and clinical outcomes in a digital musculoskeletal (MSK) program, by generation. This longitudinal study uses retrospective data collected online or by app. The study included adults with 12 or more weeks of pain who took part in a digital MSK program. We compared Gen Z and Millennials, Gen X, working age Baby Boomers, and retiree age Baby Boomer and Silent Generation. Program use outcomes were program start, program completion, and number of exercises, educational articles, and messages to coaches. Clinical outcomes were changes in pain, depression, and anxiety from baseline to 12 weeks. We calculated descriptive statistics and conducted adjusted regression models. Odds of starting the program were significantly higher for Gen Xers (OR: 1.12) and working age Baby Boomers (OR: 1.37) vs. Gen Zers and Millennials. Compared to Gen Zers and Millennials, we observed significantly higher odds of program completion among Gen Xers (OR: 1.62), working age Baby Boomers (OR: 2.24), and retirees (OR: 2.36). Compared to Gen Zers and Millennials, retirees had 19 more exercise sessions (IRR: 1.69), accessed 11 more articles (IRR: 1.84), and sent 4 more messages to coaches (IRR: 1.26). Compared to Gen Z and Millennials, we observed no significant differences in change in pain for Gen Xers, working age Baby Boomers, or retirees. Adults from multiple generations took part in a digital MSK program. Findings suggest that older generations used a digital MSK program more than younger generations, but had similar pain outcomes.

摘要

我们按代际调查了数字肌肉骨骼(MSK)项目的使用情况和临床结果。这项纵向研究使用了通过在线或应用程序收集的回顾性数据。该研究纳入了患有疼痛12周或更长时间且参加数字MSK项目的成年人。我们比较了Z世代、千禧一代、X世代、工作年龄的婴儿潮一代以及退休年龄的婴儿潮一代和沉默一代。项目使用结果包括项目开始、项目完成情况,以及锻炼次数、教育文章数量和给教练的留言数量。临床结果是从基线到12周时疼痛、抑郁和焦虑的变化。我们计算了描述性统计数据并进行了调整后的回归模型分析。X世代(比值比:1.12)和工作年龄的婴儿潮一代(比值比:1.37)开始该项目的几率显著高于Z世代和千禧一代。与Z世代和千禧一代相比,我们观察到X世代(比值比:1.62)、工作年龄的婴儿潮一代(比值比:2.24)和退休人员(比值比:2.36)完成项目的几率显著更高。与Z世代和千禧一代相比,退休人员多进行了19次锻炼(发病率比值比:1.69),多阅读了11篇文章(发病率比值比:1.84),并多给教练发送了4条留言(发病率比值比:1.26)。与Z世代和千禧一代相比,我们未观察到X世代、工作年龄的婴儿潮一代或退休人员在疼痛变化方面有显著差异。多代成年人参与了数字MSK项目。研究结果表明,较年长的一代比年轻一代更多地使用数字MSK项目,但疼痛结果相似。

相似文献

1
Older Adult Use and Outcomes in a Digital Musculoskeletal (MSK) Program, by Generation.数字肌肉骨骼(MSK)项目中老年人按代际划分的使用情况及结果
Front Digit Health. 2021 Aug 3;3:693170. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.693170. eCollection 2021.
2
Bridging the "digital divide": A comparison of use and effectiveness of an online intervention for depression between Baby Boomers and Millennials.弥合“数字鸿沟”:比较婴儿潮一代和千禧一代使用和有效性的在线抑郁干预措施。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Aug 15;236:243-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.101. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
3
Clinical outcomes one year after a digital musculoskeletal (MSK) program: an observational, longitudinal study with nonparticipant comparison group.数字肌肉骨骼 (MSK) 项目一年后的临床结果:一项具有非参与者对照组的观察性、纵向研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 11;23(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05188-x.
4
Generational differences in sexual behaviour and partnering among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性行为的男性在性行为和伴侣关系方面的代际差异。
Can J Hum Sex. 2019 Aug;28(2):215-225. doi: 10.3138/cjhs.2019-0014. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
5
Engagement and Utilization of a Complete Remote Digital Care Program for Musculoskeletal Pain Management in Urban and Rural Areas Across the United States: Longitudinal Cohort Study.美国城乡地区肌肉骨骼疼痛管理中完整远程数字护理计划的参与和使用:纵向队列研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Mar 16;11:e44316. doi: 10.2196/44316.
6
The generation and gender shifts in medicine: an exploratory survey of internal medicine physicians.医学领域的代际和性别变化:对内科医生的探索性调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 May 5;6:55. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-55.
7
Clinical Outcomes After a Digital Musculoskeletal Program for Acute and Subacute Pain: Observational, Longitudinal Study With Comparison Group.针对急慢性疼痛的数字肌肉骨骼项目的临床结果:一项有对照组的观察性纵向研究。
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Jun 27;9(2):e38214. doi: 10.2196/38214.
8
Postoperative Outcomes of a Digital Rehabilitation Program After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Retrospective, Observational Feasibility Study.全膝关节置换术后数字康复计划的术后结果:回顾性观察可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 19;6(9):e40703. doi: 10.2196/40703.
9
Is the Relationship Between Religiosity and Filial Elder-Care Norms Declining? A Comparison Between Two Middle-Aged Generations.宗教虔诚与孝道规范之间的关系正在减弱吗?两代中年人的比较。
J Relig Spiritual Aging. 2021;33(4):362-381. doi: 10.1080/15528030.2021.1900021. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
10
The Generation Gap Revisited: Generational Differences in Mental Health, Maladaptive Coping Behaviors, and Pandemic-Related Concerns During the Initial COVID-19 Pandemic.重新审视代沟:新冠疫情初期心理健康、适应不良应对行为及与疫情相关担忧方面的代际差异
J Adult Dev. 2023 Feb 16:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10804-023-09442-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Efficacy of Telemedicine for Musculoskeletal Conditions in a Medicare Advantage Population.远程医疗对医疗保险优势人群肌肉骨骼疾病的临床疗效。
Telemed Rep. 2025 May 19;6(1):162-170. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2025.0017. eCollection 2025.
2
The potential of a multimodal digital care program in addressing healthcare inequities in musculoskeletal pain management.多模式数字护理计划在解决肌肉骨骼疼痛管理中医疗保健不平等问题方面的潜力。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):188. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00936-2.
3
Personalizing digital pain management with adapted machine learning approach.采用自适应机器学习方法实现个性化数字疼痛管理。
Pain Rep. 2023 Feb 13;8(2):e1065. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001065. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
4
Managing Musculoskeletal Pain in Older Adults Through a Digital Care Solution: Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Clinical Study.通过数字护理解决方案管理老年人的肌肉骨骼疼痛:一项前瞻性临床研究的二次分析
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Aug 15;10:e49673. doi: 10.2196/49673.
5
Clinical outcomes one year after a digital musculoskeletal (MSK) program: an observational, longitudinal study with nonparticipant comparison group.数字肌肉骨骼 (MSK) 项目一年后的临床结果:一项具有非参与者对照组的观察性、纵向研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 11;23(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05188-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation between pain severity and levels of anxiety and depression in osteoarthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.骨关节炎患者疼痛严重程度与焦虑和抑郁水平的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Dec 24;61(1):53-75. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab512.
2
Short-term impact of combining pain neuroscience education with exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛中疼痛神经科学教育与运动相结合的短期影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain. 2022 Jan 1;163(1):e20-e30. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002308.
3
Effect of Internet-Based Rehabilitation Programs on Improvement of Pain and Physical Function in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.基于互联网的康复方案对膝骨关节炎患者疼痛和身体功能改善的效果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 5;23(1):e21542. doi: 10.2196/21542.
4
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 369 种疾病和伤害导致的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
5
Age Differences in the Use of Health Information Technology Among Adults in the United States: An Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.美国成年人健康信息技术使用情况的年龄差异:健康信息国家趋势调查分析
J Aging Health. 2021 Jan;33(1-2):147-154. doi: 10.1177/0898264320966266. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
6
Digital Health and Engagement-Looking Behind the Measures and Methods.数字健康与参与度——探寻背后的措施与方法
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010918. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10918.
7
Practical implications for providing physical activity counseling for the older adult: An integrative review.为老年人提供身体活动咨询的实际意义:综合评论。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2020 Jul;32(7):511-519. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000483.
8
Components, design and effectiveness of digital physical rehabilitation interventions for older people: A systematic review.老年人数字物理康复干预措施的组成部分、设计与效果:一项系统综述
J Telemed Telecare. 2022 Apr;28(3):162-176. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20927587. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
9
Perceptions and experiences of using mobile technology for medication adherence among older adults with coronary heart disease: A qualitative study.冠心病老年患者使用移动技术促进药物依从性的认知与体验:一项定性研究
Digit Health. 2020 May 20;6:2055207620926844. doi: 10.1177/2055207620926844. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
10
Older adults' experiences of using a wearable activity tracker with health professional feedback over a 12-month randomised controlled trial.在一项为期12个月的随机对照试验中,老年人使用可穿戴活动追踪器并获得健康专业人员反馈的体验。
Digit Health. 2020 Apr 26;6:2055207620921678. doi: 10.1177/2055207620921678. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.