Department of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712, TS, Groningen, Netherlands.
UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):552-562. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02004-w. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
There is growing appreciation for the role of long-term memory in guiding temporal preparation in speeded reaction time tasks. In experiments with variable foreperiods between a warning stimulus (S1) and a target stimulus (S2), preparation is affected by foreperiod distributions experienced in the past, long after the distribution has changed. These effects from memory can shape preparation largely implicitly, outside of participants' awareness. Recent studies have demonstrated the associative nature of memory-guided preparation. When distinct S1s predict different foreperiods, they can trigger differential preparation accordingly. Here, we propose that memory-guided preparation allows for another key feature of learning: the ability to generalize across acquired associations and apply them to novel situations. Participants completed a variable foreperiod task where S1 was a unique image of either a face or a scene on each trial. Images of either category were paired with different distributions with predominantly shorter versus predominantly longer foreperiods. Participants displayed differential preparation to never-before seen images of either category, without being aware of the predictive nature of these categories. They continued doing so in a subsequent Transfer phase, after they had been informed that these contingencies no longer held. A novel rolling regression analysis revealed at a fine timescale how category-guided preparation gradually developed throughout the task, and that explicit information about these contingencies only briefly disrupted memory-guided preparation. These results offer new insights into temporal preparation as the product of a largely implicit process governed by associative learning from past experiences.
人们越来越意识到长期记忆在指导快速反应时间任务中的时间准备方面的作用。在具有可变预备期的实验中,警告刺激(S1)和目标刺激(S2)之间的预备期受到过去经历的预备期分布的影响,即使在分布已经改变很久之后。这些来自记忆的影响可以在很大程度上隐含地、在参与者无意识的情况下塑造准备。最近的研究表明,记忆引导的准备具有联想性质。当不同的 S1 预测不同的预备期时,它们可以相应地触发不同的准备。在这里,我们提出记忆引导的准备允许学习的另一个关键特征:跨已获得的关联进行概括并将其应用于新情况的能力。参与者完成了一个可变预备期任务,其中 S1 是每个试验中面部或场景的独特图像。这两个类别的图像与具有主要较短或主要较长预备期的不同分布配对。参与者对从未见过的这两个类别的图像表现出不同的准备,而不知道这些类别的预测性质。在他们被告知这些关联不再成立之后,他们在随后的转移阶段继续这样做。一种新的滚动回归分析揭示了在精细时间尺度上,类别引导的准备是如何在整个任务中逐渐发展的,而这些关联的明确信息只是短暂地破坏了记忆引导的准备。这些结果为时间准备提供了新的见解,认为时间准备是一个主要由联想学习从过去经验中产生的隐含过程的产物。