Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Institute for Brain and Behaviour, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Aug;74(8):1432-1438. doi: 10.1177/1747021821995452. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
How quickly participants respond to a "go" after a "warning" signal is partly determined by the time between the two signals (the foreperiod) and the distribution of foreperiods. According to Multiple Trace Theory of Temporal Preparation (MTP), participants use memory traces of previous foreperiods to prepare for the upcoming go signal. If the processes underlying temporal preparation reflect general encoding and memory principles, transfer effects (the carryover effect of a previous block's distribution of foreperiods to the current block) should be observed regardless of the sensory modality in which signals are presented. Despite convincing evidence for transfer effects in the visual domain, only weak evidence for transfer effects has been documented in the auditory domain. Three experiments were conducted to examine whether such differences in results are due to the modality of the stimulus or other procedural factors. In each experiment, two groups of participants were exposed to different foreperiod distributions in the acquisition phase and to the same foreperiod distribution in the transfer phase. Experiment 1 used a choice-reaction time (RT) task, and the warning signal remained on until the go signal, but there was no evidence for transfer effects. Experiments 2 and 3 used a simple- and choice-RT task, respectively, and there was silence between the warning and go signals. Both experiments revealed evidence for transfer effects, which suggests that transfer effects are most evident when there is no auditory stimulation between the warning and go signals.
参与者对“警告”信号后的“开始”信号的反应速度部分取决于两个信号之间的时间(预备期)和预备期的分布。根据时间准备的多重痕迹理论(MTP),参与者使用先前预备期的记忆痕迹来为即将到来的开始信号做准备。如果时间准备过程反映了一般的编码和记忆原则,那么无论信号以何种感觉模式呈现,都应该观察到转移效应(前一个块的预备期分布对当前块的延续效应)。尽管在视觉领域有令人信服的转移效应证据,但在听觉领域只有较弱的转移效应证据。进行了三项实验来检验这些结果差异是否归因于刺激的感觉模式或其他程序因素。在每个实验中,两组参与者在获得阶段暴露于不同的预备期分布,在转移阶段暴露于相同的预备期分布。实验 1 使用了选择反应时(RT)任务,警告信号一直保持到开始信号,但没有转移效应的证据。实验 2 和实验 3 分别使用了简单和选择 RT 任务,警告和开始信号之间有静默。这两个实验都显示了转移效应的证据,这表明当警告和开始信号之间没有听觉刺激时,转移效应最为明显。