• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clinical management and primary prevention of suspected coronary artery disease guided by computed tomography.

作者信息

Beyer Christoph, Birkl Katharina, Feuchtner Gudrun, Kofler Lisa-Maria, Friedrich Guy, Plank Fabian

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine III - Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University Innsbruck.

Department of Radiology - Medical University Innsbruck.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Sep 1;22(9):680-685. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001191.

DOI:10.2459/JCM.0000000000001191
PMID:34714258
Abstract

AIMS

Despite the well established role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as a diagnostic gatekeeper, the yield of subsequent invasive coronary angiographies (ICA) remains low. We evaluated the adherence of CCTA integration in clinical management and primary prevention therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients referred for ICA after CCTA without known coronary artery disease (CAD) or structural cardiac pathologies. Based on computed tomography (CT) findings, patients were classified as appropriately or inappropriately referred to ICA, equaling Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) categories 0-2 (<50% stenosis) and 3-5 (>50% stenosis), respectively. CT exams were compared regarding invasive findings and revascularizations. Integration of CT results into primary prevention measures was analyzed and compared to measures taken after ICA.

RESULTS

Of 1005 patients referred for ICA, 81 (8.1%) had no obstructive CT findings and therefore no ICA indication. ICA inappropriate patients did not differ in symptom characteristics, but had a significantly lower revascularization rate (3.7% vs. 42.1%, P < 0.0001) compared with patients appropriately referred to ICA. In patients with indication for lipid-lowering therapy after the CCTA statin rate was 53.1% and significantly increased after ICA to 76.4% (P < 0.0001). In CCTA, obstructive findings in proximal-only lesions did not increase the revascularization rate (45.6% vs. 42.1%, P = 0.11) but missed nonproximal relevant stenoses (15.0% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.0001) compared with obstructive findings in all segments.

CONCLUSION

The overall rate of inappropriateness was low, but there is relevant statin underutilization in eligible patients due to a lack of CT findings integration. Both ICA referrals and primary preventive therapy could be improved by the implementation of CT results based on CAD-RADS recommendations.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clinical management and primary prevention of suspected coronary artery disease guided by computed tomography.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Sep 1;22(9):680-685. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001191.
2
Adoption of coronary artery disease - Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS™) and observed impact on medical therapy and systolic blood pressure control.采用冠状动脉疾病报告和数据系统(CAD-RADS™)及其对药物治疗和收缩压控制的影响观察。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):421-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
3
Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.采用 CCTA 选择性转诊与直接转诊对疑似 CAD 行有创冠状动脉造影检查的患者进行对比:一项随机、对照、开放标签试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;12(7 Pt 2):1303-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
4
Discrepancies between coronary CT angiography and invasive coronary angiography with focus on culprit lesions which cause future cardiac events.冠状动脉 CT 血管造影与有创冠状动脉造影的差异,重点是导致未来心脏事件的罪犯病变。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1356-1364. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5095-2. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
5
Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术作为侵入性诊断和手术程序的守门员:来自多中心 CONFIRM(冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术评估临床结果:国际多中心)登记研究的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 13;60(20):2103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.062. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
6
Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.与心肌灌注成像(MPI)相比,64排无创计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CCTA)的诊断准确性:PICTURE研究,一项前瞻性多中心试验。
Acad Radiol. 2017 Jan;24(1):22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
7
Potential for coronary CT angiography to tailor medical therapy beyond preventive guideline-based recommendations: insights from the ROMICAT I trial.冠状动脉CT血管造影超越基于预防性指南建议来定制药物治疗的潜力:来自ROMICAT I试验的见解
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 May-Jun;9(3):193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
8
Non-diagnostic coronary artery calcification and stenosis: a correlation of coronary computed tomography angiography and invasive coronary angiography.非诊断性冠状动脉钙化与狭窄:冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影与有创冠状动脉血管造影的相关性
Acta Radiol. 2017 May;58(5):528-536. doi: 10.1177/0284185116663041. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
9
Coronary computed tomography angiography versus invasive coronary angiography: medical staff perceptions and diagnostic interest in Gaza-Palestine.冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影与有创冠状动脉造影:加沙-巴勒斯坦地区医务人员的认知和诊断兴趣。
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 May;190(2):567-575. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02376-3. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
10
Diagnosing coronary artery disease after a positive coronary computed tomography angiography: the Dan-NICAD open label, parallel, head to head, randomized controlled diagnostic accuracy trial of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.冠状动脉 CT 血管造影阳性后的冠状动脉疾病诊断:心血管磁共振与心肌灌注闪烁显像的丹-NICAD 开放标签、平行、头对头、随机对照诊断准确性试验。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Apr 1;19(4):369-377. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex342.