• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在耕地施用农家肥、粪肥或厌氧消化物后即食沙拉相关的定量微生物风险评估。

Quantitative microbial risk assessment associated with ready-to-eat salads following the application of farmyard manure and slurry or anaerobic digestate to arable lands.

作者信息

Nag Rajat, Russell Lauren, Nolan Stephen, Auer Agathe, Markey Bryan K, Whyte Paul, O'Flaherty Vincent, Bolton Declan, Fenton Owen, Richards Karl G, Cummins Enda

机构信息

University College Dublin, School of Biosystems and Food Engineering, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Teagasc, Ashtown Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, Ireland; University College Dublin, School of Veterinary Medicine, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 3):151227. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151227. Epub 2021 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151227
PMID:34715220
Abstract

Farmyard manure and slurry (FYM&S) and anaerobic digestate are potentially valuable soil conditioners providing important nutrients for plant development and growth. However, these organic fertilisers may pose a microbial health risk to humans. A quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) model was developed to investigate the potential human exposure to pathogens following the application of FYM&S and digestate to agricultural land. The farm-to-fork probabilistic model investigated the fate of microbial indicators (total coliforms and enterococci) and foodborne pathogens in the soil with potential contamination of ready-to-eat salads (RTEs) at the point of human consumption. The processes examined included pathogen inactivation during mesophilic anaerobic digestion (M-AD), post-AD pasteurisation, storage, dilution while spreading, decay in soil, post-harvest washing processes, and finally, the potential growth of the pathogen during refrigeration/storage at the retail level in the Irish context. The QMRA highlighted a very low annual probability of risk (P) due to Clostridium perfringens, norovirus, and Salmonella Newport across all scenarios. Mycobacterium avium may result in a very high mean P for the application of raw FYM&S, while Cryptosporidium parvum and pathogenic E. coli showed high P, and Listeria monocytogenes displayed moderate P for raw FYM&S application. The use of AD reduces this risk; however, pasteurisation reduces the P to an even greater extent posing a very low risk. An overall sensitivity analysis revealed that mesophilic-AD's inactivation effect is the most sensitive parameter of the QMRA, followed by storage and the decay on the field (all negatively correlated to risk estimate). The information generated from this model can help to inform guidelines for policymakers on the maximum permissible indicator or pathogen contamination levels in the digestate. The QMRA can also provide the AD industry with a safety assessment of pathogenic organisms resulting from the digestion of FYM&S.

摘要

农家肥和粪肥(FYM&S)以及厌氧消化残余物是潜在的有价值的土壤改良剂,能为植物的发育和生长提供重要养分。然而,这些有机肥料可能会对人类健康构成微生物风险。为此开发了一个定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)模型,以研究在农田施用FYM&S和消化残余物后人类接触病原体的潜在风险。这个从农场到餐桌的概率模型研究了微生物指标(总大肠菌群和肠球菌)以及食源性病原体在土壤中的归宿,以及在人类消费点即食沙拉(RTE)可能受到的污染情况。所考察的过程包括嗜温厌氧消化(M-AD)过程中病原体的失活、厌氧消化后的巴氏杀菌、储存、撒施时的稀释、在土壤中的衰减、收获后的清洗过程,最后是在爱尔兰环境下零售层面冷藏/储存期间病原体的潜在生长情况。QMRA强调,在所有情况下,产气荚膜梭菌、诺如病毒和纽波特沙门氏菌导致的年度风险概率(P)非常低。鸟分枝杆菌可能会导致在施用未处理的FYM&S时出现非常高的平均P值,而微小隐孢子虫和致病性大肠杆菌显示出高P值,单核细胞增生李斯特菌在施用未处理的FYM&S时显示出中等P值。使用厌氧消化可降低这种风险;然而,巴氏杀菌能更大程度地降低P值,使其风险非常低。总体敏感性分析表明,嗜温厌氧消化的失活效果是QMRA中最敏感的参数,其次是储存和田间衰减(均与风险估计呈负相关)。该模型生成的信息有助于为政策制定者提供有关消化残余物中最大允许指标或病原体污染水平的指导方针。QMRA还可为厌氧消化行业提供对FYM&S消化产生的致病生物的安全评估。

相似文献

1
Quantitative microbial risk assessment associated with ready-to-eat salads following the application of farmyard manure and slurry or anaerobic digestate to arable lands.在耕地施用农家肥、粪肥或厌氧消化物后即食沙拉相关的定量微生物风险评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 3):151227. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151227. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
2
Evaluation of pathogen concentration in anaerobic digestate using a predictive modelling approach (ADRISK).使用预测建模方法(ADRISK)评估厌氧消化液中的病原体浓度。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 15;800:149574. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149574. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Ranking hazards pertaining to human health concerns from land application of anaerobic digestate.对厌氧消化残渣土地应用中涉及人类健康问题的危害进行排序。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 25;710:136297. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136297. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
4
Anaerobic digestion of agricultural manure and biomass - Critical indicators of risk and knowledge gaps.农业粪便和生物质的厌氧消化-风险和知识缺口的关键指标。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 10;690:460-479. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.512. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
5
A Bayesian inference approach to quantify average pathogen loads in farmyard manure and slurry using open-source Irish datasets.一种使用开源爱尔兰数据集的贝叶斯推断方法,用于量化农家肥和粪浆中的平均病原体负荷。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 10;786:147474. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147474. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
6
Quantitative microbial human exposure model for faecal indicator bacteria and risk assessment of pathogenic Escherichia coli in surface runoff following application of dairy cattle slurry and co-digestate to grassland.奶牛粪便和共消化物施用于草地后地表径流中粪便指示菌的定量微生物人体暴露模型及致病性大肠杆菌的风险评估
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 1;299:113627. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113627. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
7
Evaluation of the occurrence of sporulating and nonsporulating pathogenic bacteria in manure and in digestate of five agricultural biogas plants.评估 5 个农业沼气厂的粪便和消化物中有无孢子形成和无孢子形成的致病菌的发生情况。
Microbiologyopen. 2019 Oct;8(10):e872. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.872. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Landspreading with co-digested cattle slurry, with or without pasteurisation, as a mitigation strategy against pathogen, nutrient and metal contamination associated with untreated slurry.土地施用未经处理的牛粪浆与经巴氏消毒或未经巴氏消毒的混合浆作为减轻与未经处理的浆体相关的病原体、养分和金属污染的缓解策略。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 20;744:140841. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140841. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
9
Quantification of indicator and pathogenic bacteria in manures and digestates from three agricultural biogas plants over a one-year period.一年内三个农业沼气厂的粪便和消化物中指示菌和病原菌的定量分析。
Waste Manag. 2023 Sep 1;169:91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.06.037. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
10
Changes in bacterial diversity, co-occurrence pattern, and potential pathogens following digestate fertilization: Extending pathogen management to field for anaerobic digestion of livestock manure.粪肥施肥后细菌多样性、共现模式和潜在病原体的变化:将病原体管理扩展到用于牲畜粪便厌氧消化的田间。
Waste Manag. 2023 Mar 1;158:107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and Practices of Cypriot Bovine Farmers towards Effective and Safe Manure Management.塞浦路斯养牛农户对有效且安全的粪便管理的认知与实践
Vet Sci. 2023 Apr 14;10(4):293. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10040293.
2
Cultivation Conditions of Spinach and Rocket Influence Epiphytic Growth of .菠菜和芝麻菜的栽培条件影响……的附生生长
Foods. 2022 Oct 1;11(19):3056. doi: 10.3390/foods11193056.