• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑心理健康应用中的多样性、公平性和包容性:评估框架的范围综述。

Considerations of diversity, equity, and inclusion in mental health apps: A scoping review of evaluation frameworks.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 2021 Dec;147:103990. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103990. Epub 2021 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2021.103990
PMID:34715396
Abstract

Mental health applications or apps are a promising approach to reduce the pervasive unmet mental health need observed among marginalized groups. However, these groups face unique challenges to engage in and benefit from these interventions, and apps that consider issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) may be better positioned to reach them. App evaluation frameworks emerge as crucial tools for researchers, clinicians, and users to select evidence-based apps. Nevertheless, it is unclear the extent to which existing assessment tools capture DEI factors. The present scoping review identified 68 studies that employed one or more assessment tools to evaluate a mental health app, leading to 44 unique app evaluation frameworks. Results showed that most frameworks were developed after 2015, and only 58% of them considered at least one DEI criterion. Frameworks that performed exceptionally well were those that combined multiple standardized and validated measures. This lack of consideration for DEI variables may limit the ability of app-based interventions to serve marginalized communities, or even worse, create new disparities. Therefore, we provide recommendations to improve current app evaluation frameworks' cultural robustness and clinical utility, maximizing their effectiveness when working with individuals from marginalized communities.

摘要

心理健康应用程序(apps)是一种很有前途的方法,可以减少边缘化群体中普遍存在的未满足的心理健康需求。然而,这些群体在参与和受益于这些干预措施方面面临着独特的挑战,而考虑多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)问题的应用程序可能更有能力接触到他们。应用程序评估框架作为研究人员、临床医生和用户选择基于证据的应用程序的重要工具而出现。然而,目前还不清楚现有的评估工具在多大程度上捕捉到了 DEI 因素。本范围综述确定了 68 项研究,这些研究使用了一种或多种评估工具来评估心理健康应用程序,从而产生了 44 个独特的应用程序评估框架。结果表明,大多数框架是在 2015 年之后开发的,只有 58%的框架考虑了至少一个 DEI 标准。表现特别出色的框架是那些结合了多种标准化和验证过的措施的框架。这种对 DEI 变量的不考虑可能会限制基于应用程序的干预措施为边缘化社区服务的能力,甚至更糟糕的是,会造成新的差距。因此,我们提供了一些建议,以提高当前应用程序评估框架的文化稳健性和临床实用性,使其在与边缘化社区的个人合作时最大程度地发挥效果。

相似文献

1
Considerations of diversity, equity, and inclusion in mental health apps: A scoping review of evaluation frameworks.考虑心理健康应用中的多样性、公平性和包容性:评估框架的范围综述。
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Dec;147:103990. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103990. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
2
Evaluating evaluation frameworks: a scoping review of frameworks for assessing health apps.评估评估框架:评估健康类应用程序框架的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 19;11(3):e047001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047001.
3
Diversity, equity and inclusion considerations in mental health apps for young people: protocol for a scoping review.年轻人心理健康应用中的多样性、公平性和包容性考虑因素:范围综述的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 7;14(5):e081673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081673.
4
mHealth Solutions for Perinatal Mental Health: Scoping Review and Appraisal Following the mHealth Index and Navigation Database Framework.移动医疗在围产期心理健康中的应用:基于移动医疗索引和导航数据库框架的系统评价和评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 17;10(1):e30724. doi: 10.2196/30724.
5
Mobile Technologies for Supporting Mental Health in Youths: Scoping Review of Effectiveness, Limitations, and Inclusivity.支持青少年心理健康的移动技术:有效性、局限性和包容性的范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Aug 23;10:e46949. doi: 10.2196/46949.
6
Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Quality of Resilience-Building Mobile Health Apps for Military, Veteran, and Public Safety Personnel Populations: Scoping Literature Review and App Evaluation.提升军人、退伍军人和公共安全人员人群韧性的移动健康应用的疗效、有效性和质量:范围文献综述和应用评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 19;10(1):e26453. doi: 10.2196/26453.
7
Cultural and Digital Health Literacy Appropriateness of App- and Web-Based Systems Designed for Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Scoping Review.专为患有妊娠糖尿病的孕妇设计的基于 APP 和网络的系统的文化和数字健康素养适宜性:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 14;24(10):e37844. doi: 10.2196/37844.
8
Scoping review: Development and assessment of evaluation frameworks of mobile health apps for recommendations to consumers.范围综述:为消费者提供建议的移动健康应用评估框架的开发和评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jun 12;28(6):1318-1329. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab041.
9
The Acceptability, Engagement, and Feasibility of Mental Health Apps for Marginalized and Underserved Young People: Systematic Review and Qualitative Study.边缘化和服务不足的年轻人使用心理健康应用的可接受性、参与度和可行性:系统评价和定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 30;26:e48964. doi: 10.2196/48964.
10
The Reviews Are in: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Consumer Perspectives on Apps for Bipolar Disorder.评论如下:关于双相情感障碍应用程序消费者观点的定性内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 7;19(4):e105. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7273.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of generative AI for the assessment and treatment of autism spectrum disorders: a scoping review.生成式人工智能在自闭症谱系障碍评估与治疗中的应用:一项范围综述
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 22;16:1628216. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1628216. eCollection 2025.
2
Development of the Psychosocial Rehabilitation Web Application (Psychosocial Rehab App).心理社会康复网络应用程序(心理社会康复应用程序)的开发。
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 25;15(7):228. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15070228.
3
Evaluating the Quality of Psychotherapy Conversational Agents: Framework Development and Cross-Sectional Study.
评估心理治疗对话代理的质量:框架开发与横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 2;9:e65605. doi: 10.2196/65605.
4
Analyzing metaverse-based digital therapies, their effectiveness, and potential risks in mental healthcare.分析基于元宇宙的数字疗法、其在精神卫生保健中的有效性和潜在风险。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 16;15(1):17066. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00916-4.
5
Developing Digital Mental Health Tools With Culturally Diverse Parents and Young People: Qualitative User-Centered Design Study.与文化背景多样的父母和年轻人共同开发数字心理健康工具:以用户为中心的定性设计研究。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2025 Apr 22;8:e65163. doi: 10.2196/65163.
6
Evaluating User Engagement With a Real-Time, Text-Based Digital Mental Health Support App: Cross-Sectional, Retrospective Study.评估用户对一款基于文本的实时数字心理健康支持应用程序的参与度:横断面回顾性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 14;9:e66301. doi: 10.2196/66301.
7
Developing a standardized framework for evaluating health apps using natural language processing.使用自然语言处理技术开发一个用于评估健康应用程序的标准化框架。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 6;15(1):11775. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96369-w.
8
Initial Requirements for the Prototyping of an App for a Psychosocial Rehabilitation Project: An Integrative Review.心理社会康复项目应用程序原型设计的初始要求:一项综合综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 18;22(2):310. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020310.
9
Centering equity, diversity, and inclusion in youth digital mental health: findings from a research, policy, and practice knowledge exchange workshop.将公平、多样性和包容性置于青少年数字心理健康的核心:研究、政策与实践知识交流研讨会的成果
Front Digit Health. 2024 Oct 31;6:1449129. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1449129. eCollection 2024.
10
Digital Health Readiness: Making Digital Health Care More Inclusive.数字健康准备:让数字医疗更具包容性。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Oct 9;12:e58035. doi: 10.2196/58035.