• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估用户对一款基于文本的实时数字心理健康支持应用程序的参与度:横断面回顾性研究。

Evaluating User Engagement With a Real-Time, Text-Based Digital Mental Health Support App: Cross-Sectional, Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Coffield Edward, Kausar Khadeja

机构信息

Department of Population Health, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, United States.

Business Intelligence and Value Based Management Analytics, Medical Affairs, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 14;9:e66301. doi: 10.2196/66301.

DOI:10.2196/66301
PMID:40228290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12038291/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of US adults identify as having a mental illness. Structural and other barriers prevent many people from receiving mental health services. Digital mental health apps that provide 24-hour, real-time access to human support may improve access to mental health services. However, information is needed regarding how and why people engage with licensed counselors through a digital, real-time, text-based mental health support app in nonexperimental settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate how people engage with Counslr, a 24-hour, digital, mental health support app where users communicate in real time with human counselors through text messaging. Specifically, access patterns (eg, day of the week and time of session) and reasons for accessing the platform were examined. Furthermore, whether differences existed between session types (on-demand or scheduled) and membership types (education or noneducation) in regard to access patterns and why people accessed the platform were evaluated.

METHODS

The study population (users) consisted of students whose schools, universities, or colleges partnered with Counslr and employees whose organizations also partnered with Counslr. Users participated in text-based mental health support sessions. In these sessions, users engaged with licensed counselors through digital, text-based messaging in real time. Users could initiate an on-demand session or schedule a session 24 hours a day. User engagement patterns were evaluated through session length, session day, session time, and self-reported reasons for initiating the session. The data were stratified by membership type (education [students] or noneducation [employees]) and session type (on-demand or scheduled) to evaluate whether differences existed in usage patterns and self-reported reasons for initiating sessions by membership and session types.

RESULTS

Most students (178/283, 62.9%) and employees (28/44, 63.6%) accessed Counslr through on-demand sessions. The average and median session times were 40 (SD 15.3) and 45 minutes. On-demand sessions (37.9 minutes) were shorter (P=.001) than scheduled sessions (43.5 minutes). Most users (262/327, 80.1%) accessed Counslr between 7 PM and 5 AM. The hours that users accessed Counslr did not statistically differ by membership type (P=.19) or session type (P=.10). Primary self-reported reasons for accessing Counslr were relationship reasons, depression, and anxiety; however, users initiated sessions for a variety of reasons. Statistically significant differences existed between membership and session types (P<.05) for some of the reasons why people initiated sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel findings of this study illustrate that real-time, digital mental health support apps, which offer people the opportunity to engage with licensed counselors outside of standard office hours for a variety of mental health conditions, may help address structural barriers to accessing mental health support services. Additional research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of human-based apps such as Counslr and whether such apps can also address disparities in access to mental health support services among different demographic groups.

摘要

背景

约20%的美国成年人认为自己患有精神疾病。结构和其他障碍使许多人无法获得心理健康服务。提供24小时实时人工支持的数字心理健康应用程序可能会改善心理健康服务的可及性。然而,在非实验环境中,人们如何以及为何通过数字、实时、基于文本的心理健康支持应用程序与持牌咨询师互动,这方面仍需要信息。

目的

本研究旨在评估人们如何与Counslr(一款24小时数字心理健康支持应用程序,用户通过短信与人工咨询师实时沟通)互动。具体而言,研究了访问模式(如星期几和会话时间)以及访问该平台的原因。此外,还评估了会话类型(按需或预约)和会员类型(教育或非教育)在访问模式方面是否存在差异,以及人们访问该平台的原因。

方法

研究人群(用户)包括其学校、大学或学院与Counslr合作的学生,以及其组织也与Counslr合作的员工。用户参与基于文本的心理健康支持会话。在这些会话中,用户通过数字、基于文本的消息与持牌咨询师实时互动。用户可以随时发起按需会话或预约24小时内的会话。通过会话时长、会话日期、会话时间以及发起会话的自我报告原因来评估用户参与模式。数据按会员类型(教育[学生]或非教育[员工])和会话类型(按需或预约)进行分层,以评估在使用模式以及按会员和会话类型发起会话的自我报告原因方面是否存在差异。

结果

大多数学生(178/283,62.9%)和员工(28/44,63.6%)通过按需会话访问Counslr。平均会话时间和中位数会话时间分别为40(标准差15.3)分钟和45分钟。按需会话(37.9分钟)比预约会话(43.5分钟)短(P = 0.001)。大多数用户(262/327,80.1%)在晚上7点至凌晨5点之间访问Counslr。用户访问Counslr的时间在会员类型(P = 0.19)或会话类型(P = 0.10)方面无统计学差异。访问Counslr的主要自我报告原因是人际关系问题、抑郁和焦虑;然而,用户发起会话的原因多种多样。在人们发起会话的一些原因方面,会员和会话类型之间存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.05)。

结论

本研究的新发现表明,实时数字心理健康支持应用程序为人们提供了在标准办公时间之外因各种心理健康状况与持牌咨询师互动的机会,可能有助于解决获得心理健康支持服务的结构障碍。需要进一步研究来评估像Counslr这样的基于人工的应用程序的有效性,以及此类应用程序是否也能解决不同人口群体在获得心理健康支持服务方面的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7b8/12038291/631ec0aa1a82/formative_v9i1e66301_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7b8/12038291/631ec0aa1a82/formative_v9i1e66301_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7b8/12038291/631ec0aa1a82/formative_v9i1e66301_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating User Engagement With a Real-Time, Text-Based Digital Mental Health Support App: Cross-Sectional, Retrospective Study.评估用户对一款基于文本的实时数字心理健康支持应用程序的参与度:横断面回顾性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 14;9:e66301. doi: 10.2196/66301.
2
Attitudes Toward Seeking Mental Health Services and Mobile Technology to Support the Management of Depression Among Black American Women: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.美国黑人女性对寻求心理健康服务和移动技术来支持抑郁症管理的态度:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 19;25:e45766. doi: 10.2196/45766.
3
Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis.目标 用户对心理健康应用程序的参与度:系统检索与基于小组的使用情况分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 25;21(9):e14567. doi: 10.2196/14567.
4
An Empathy-Driven, Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent (Wysa) for Digital Mental Well-Being: Real-World Data Evaluation Mixed-Methods Study.用于数字心理健康的共情驱动对话式人工智能代理(Wysa):现实世界数据评估混合方法研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 23;6(11):e12106. doi: 10.2196/12106.
5
Improving Mental Health and Well-Being Through the Paradym App: Quantitative Study of Real-World Data.通过Paradym应用程序改善心理健康和幸福感:真实世界数据的定量研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 23;9:e68031. doi: 10.2196/68031.
6
The Impact of User Engagement With Exposure Components on Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in an mHealth Mobile App: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.用户与暴露成分的互动对移动健康应用程序中创伤后应激症状的影响:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jul 18;12:e49393. doi: 10.2196/49393.
7
The Acceptability, Engagement, and Feasibility of Mental Health Apps for Marginalized and Underserved Young People: Systematic Review and Qualitative Study.边缘化和服务不足的年轻人使用心理健康应用的可接受性、参与度和可行性:系统评价和定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 30;26:e48964. doi: 10.2196/48964.
8
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
9
A Mobile Health Intervention to Support Collaborative Decision-Making in Mental Health Care: Development and Usability.一项支持精神卫生保健中共同决策的移动健康干预措施:开发与可用性
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 17;9:e57614. doi: 10.2196/57614.
10
Trends in Mental Health Outcomes of College Students Amid the Pandemic (Roadmap mHealth App): Longitudinal Observational Study.疫情期间大学生心理健康状况的趋势(路线图移动健康应用程序):纵向观察研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 9;27:e67627. doi: 10.2196/67627.

本文引用的文献

1
The engagement problem: A review of engagement with digital mental health interventions and recommendations for a path forward.参与度问题:关于数字心理健康干预措施参与度的综述及未来发展路径建议
Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;10(3):119-135. doi: 10.1007/s40501-023-00297-3. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
2
A Mental Health and Well-Being Chatbot: User Event Log Analysis.心理健康与幸福感聊天机器人:用户事件日志分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Jul 6;11:e43052. doi: 10.2196/43052.
3
Longitudinal Patterns of Engagement and Clinical Outcomes: Results From a Therapist-Supported Digital Mental Health Intervention.
纵向参与模式与临床结局:一项基于治疗师支持的数字心理健康干预的研究结果。
Psychosom Med. 2023 Sep 1;85(7):651-658. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001230. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
4
Examining young adults daily perspectives on usage of anxiety apps: A user study.审视年轻成年人对焦虑类应用程序使用情况的日常看法:一项用户研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Jan 26;2(1):e0000185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000185. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Message-based psychotherapy for older adults: A cohort comparison study.针对老年人的基于信息的心理治疗:一项队列比较研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 25;13:951354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.951354. eCollection 2022.
6
Digital interventions for the treatment of depression: A meta-analytic review.数字干预措施治疗抑郁症的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2021 Aug;147(8):749-786. doi: 10.1037/bul0000334.
7
Considerations of diversity, equity, and inclusion in mental health apps: A scoping review of evaluation frameworks.考虑心理健康应用中的多样性、公平性和包容性:评估框架的范围综述。
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Dec;147:103990. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103990. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
8
Mental Health Treatment Among Adults: United States, 2020.成年人心理健康治疗:美国,2020 年。
NCHS Data Brief. 2021 Oct(419):1-8.
9
Banbury Forum Consensus Statement on the Path Forward for Digital Mental Health Treatment.班伯里论坛关于数字心理健康治疗前进道路的共识声明。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jun;72(6):677-683. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000561. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
10
It Is Time to REACT: Opportunities for Digital Mental Health Apps to Reduce Mental Health Disparities in Racially and Ethnically Minoritized Groups.是时候做出反应了:数字心理健康应用程序减少种族和族裔少数群体心理健康差距的机遇。
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Jan 26;8(1):e25456. doi: 10.2196/25456.