Suppr超能文献

在一家三级学术医疗中心,静脉推注左乙拉西坦与静脉滴注相比的安全性:一项回顾性分析。

Safety of Intravenous Push Levetiracetam Compared to Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center: A Retrospective Analysis.

作者信息

Alkazemi Afrah, McLaughlin Kevin C, Chan Michael G, Schontz Michael J, Anger Kevin E, Szumita Paul M

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115-6195, USA.

Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences University, 179 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2022 Jan;45(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01122-7. Epub 2021 Oct 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medication administration via intravenous push presents multiple potential advantages; however, there may be an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. In 2020, Brigham and Women's Hospital changed levetiracetam intravenous administration to intravenous push (IVP).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this analysis was to compare the safety profile of IVP to intravenous piggyback (IVPB) levetiracetam administration.

METHODS

This institutional review board-approved, single-center, pre-post analysis was performed between 1 November, 2019 and 30 May, 2020. The electronic health record was used to identify all administrations of intravenous levetiracetam greater than 1000 mg in patients ≥ 18 years old. The major safety outcomes included hypotension, bradycardia, drug-induced sedation, and intravenous site reactions such as phlebitis and infiltration. The major efficiency outcome was the time from pharmacy order verification to first-dose administration.

RESULTS

A total of 498 administrations in 162 patients were included in the analysis: 252 administrations in 84 patients in the IVP group and 246 administrations in 78 patients in the IVPB group. The incidence of bradycardia was 7 vs 3 (3.2% vs 1.5%, p = 0.34); hypotension 10 vs 6 (5.2% vs 3.5%, p = 0.44); sedation 21 vs 36 (19.3% vs 27.9%, p = 0.12); and peripheral IV site reactions 0 vs 1 (0% vs 0.6%, p = 0.39) in the IVP vs IVPB groups, respectively. The median time between order verification and first-dose administration was significantly reduced in the IVP vs IVPB group (23.5 vs 55 min, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous push levetiracetam administration of doses up to 4000 mg was associated with a similar incidence of cardiovascular, sedation, and infusion site-related adverse events compared to IVPB and resulted in a significant reduction in time to first-dose administration. Intravenous push levetiracetam in doses as high as 4000 mg may be considered safe with appropriate monitoring.

摘要

引言

静脉推注给药具有多种潜在优势;然而,药物不良反应的风险可能会增加。2020年,布莱根妇女医院将左乙拉西坦的静脉给药方式改为静脉推注(IVP)。

目的

本分析的目的是比较静脉推注左乙拉西坦与静脉滴注(IVPB)左乙拉西坦给药的安全性。

方法

本研究经机构审查委员会批准,为单中心前后分析,于2019年11月1日至2020年5月30日进行。利用电子健康记录识别≥18岁患者中所有静脉注射剂量大于1000mg的左乙拉西坦给药情况。主要安全结局包括低血压、心动过缓、药物引起的镇静作用以及静脉注射部位反应,如静脉炎和渗漏。主要效率结局是从药房订单核对到首次给药的时间。

结果

分析共纳入162例患者的498次给药:IVP组84例患者中的252次给药,IVPB组78例患者中的246次给药。IVP组与IVPB组相比,心动过缓的发生率分别为7例对3例(3.2%对1.5%,p = 0.34);低血压分别为10例对6例(5.2%对3.5%,p = 0.44);镇静作用分别为21例对36例(19.3%对27.9%,p = 0.12);外周静脉注射部位反应分别为0例对1例(0%对0.6%,p = 0.39)。IVP组与IVPB组相比,订单核对与首次给药之间的中位时间显著缩短(23.5分钟对55分钟,p < 0.001)。

结论

与静脉滴注相比,静脉推注剂量高达4000mg的左乙拉西坦时,心血管、镇静和输液部位相关不良事件的发生率相似,且首次给药时间显著缩短。在适当监测下,静脉推注剂量高达4000mg的左乙拉西坦可能被认为是安全的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验