Schmid-Hempel Paul
Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), ETH Zürich, ETH-Zentrum CHN, Universitätstrasse 16, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2021;75(11):156. doi: 10.1007/s00265-021-03092-3. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
Parasites and their social hosts form many different relationships. But what kind of selection regimes are important? A look at the parameters that determine fitness of the two parties suggests that social hosts differ from solitary ones primarily in the structure of transmission pathways. Because transmission is, both, the physical encounter of a new host and infecting it, several different elements determine parasite transmission success. These include spatial distance, genetic distance, or the temporal and ecological niche overlaps. Combing these elements into a 'generalized transmission distance' that determines parasite fitness aids in the identification of the critical steps. For example, short-distance transmission to genetically similar hosts within the social group is the most frequent process under sociality. Therefore, spatio-genetical distances are the main driver of parasite fitness. Vice versa, the generalized distance identifies the critical host defences. In this case, host defences should be primarily selected to defend against the within-group spread of an infection, especially among closely related group members.
寄生虫与其社会性宿主形成了许多不同的关系。但哪种选择机制很重要呢?审视决定双方适应性的参数表明,社会性宿主与独居宿主的主要区别在于传播途径的结构。因为传播既是与新宿主的身体接触并感染它,所以几个不同的因素决定了寄生虫传播的成功。这些因素包括空间距离、遗传距离,或时间和生态位重叠。将这些因素整合为一个决定寄生虫适应性的“广义传播距离”,有助于识别关键步骤。例如,在社会性群体中向基因相似的宿主进行短距离传播是社会性条件下最常见的过程。因此,空间遗传距离是寄生虫适应性的主要驱动因素。反之,广义距离也能识别关键的宿主防御机制。在这种情况下,宿主防御机制应主要被选择用于抵御感染在群体内的传播,尤其是在亲缘关系密切的群体成员之间。