Sapra Ipsita, Nayak Bibhu P
School of Public Policy and Governance, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, India.
School of Livelihoods and Development, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, India.
J Soc Econ Dev. 2021;23(Suppl 2):398-413. doi: 10.1007/s40847-021-00155-z. Epub 2021 May 6.
The immediate aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic in India saw a mass movement of people, mainly from the cities and large towns to the villages. The lockdown announced by the government abruptly suspended the instrumental value of the city for the millions of migrant workers inhabiting these. As the lockdown period extended, with very uncertain means of inter-state public transport, desperate migrant workers took to the streets in large numbers undertaking arduous and often dangerous journeys to their places of origin. The media highlighting the plight of the migrants elicited responses from different sections. This paper is an exploration of the role of the state and its institutions, civil society and the judiciary in responding to the migrant crisis in the city of Hyderabad, a hub of migrant workers. Closely following the silences and pronouncements of the institutions and analysing the role of each of these over the different phases of the migrant crisis, the paper asserts the need for a closer scrutiny of the universal role of the state response during the migrant crisis.
在印度,新冠疫情刚结束后便出现了大规模的人口流动,主要是从城市和大城镇流向乡村。政府宣布的封锁突然中断了城市对于数百万居住在其中的农民工的工具价值。随着封锁期延长,由于跨州公共交通方式非常不确定,绝望的农民工大量涌上街头,踏上了返回家乡的艰难且往往危险的旅程。媒体对农民工困境的报道引发了不同群体的反应。本文探讨了国家及其机构、民间社会和司法机构在应对海得拉巴市(一个农民工聚居中心)的移民危机中所起的作用。通过密切关注各机构的沉默与表态,并分析它们在移民危机不同阶段所起的作用,本文主张有必要更仔细地审视国家在移民危机期间应对措施的普遍作用。