• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Review of Functions of Speculative Thinking.思辨思维的功能综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 15;12:728946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728946. eCollection 2021.
2
Improving the past and the future: a temporal asymmetry in hypothetical thinking.改善过去和未来:假设思考中的时间不对称性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):23-7. doi: 10.1037/a0027947. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
3
Improving Physical Task Performance with Counterfactual and Prefactual Thinking.运用反事实思维和预期思维提高身体任务表现。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 12;11(12):e0168181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168181. eCollection 2016.
4
Defensive pessimism, optimism, and simulating alternatives: some ups and downs of prefactual and counterfactual thinking.防御性悲观、乐观以及模拟替代方案:事前与反事实思维的一些起伏
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Nov;71(5):1020-36. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.5.1020.
5
"It's not my fault--but only I can change it": counterfactual and prefactual thoughts of managers.“这不是我的错——但只有我能改变它”:管理者的反事实与前事实思维
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Apr;89(2):279-92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.279.
6
Counterfactual thinking: an fMRI study on changing the past for a better future.反事实思维:一项关于为更美好的未来改变过去的 fMRI 研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Jun;8(5):556-64. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss031. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
7
Episodic Past, Future, and counterfactual thinking in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple sclerosis.复发性缓解型多发性硬化症中的情景式过去、未来和反事实思维。
Neuroimage Clin. 2022;34:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103033. Epub 2022 May 5.
8
Counterfactual and prefactual conditionals.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2004 Jun;58(2):113-20. doi: 10.1037/h0085791.
9
Undoing the past in order to lie in the present: Counterfactual thinking and deceptive communication.为了活在当下而改写过去:反事实思维与欺骗性沟通。
Cognition. 2017 Apr;161:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
10
If only… a systematic review and meta-analysis of social, temporal and counterfactual comparative thinking in PTSD.要是……对创伤后应激障碍中社会、时间和反事实比较思维的系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Apr 2;11(1):1737453. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1737453. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The asymmetric impact of decision-making confidence on regret and relief.决策信心对遗憾和宽慰的非对称影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 8;15:1365743. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1365743. eCollection 2024.
2
How Duty-Free Policy Influences Travel Intention: Mediating Role of Perceived Value and Moderating Roles of COVID-19 Severity and Counterfactual Thinking.免税政策如何影响旅行意愿:感知价值的中介作用以及新冠疫情严重程度和反事实思维的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 17;13:908736. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908736. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Of Mice, Men, and Trolleys: Hypothetical Judgment Versus Real-Life Behavior in Trolley-Style Moral Dilemmas.《老鼠、男人和电车:在电车式道德困境中,假设判断与现实行为》。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;29(7):1084-1093. doi: 10.1177/0956797617752640. Epub 2018 May 9.
2
Self-blame attributions in relatives of people with recent-onset psychosis: Associations with relatives' distress and behavioural control.近期发病精神病患者亲属的自责归因:与亲属痛苦及行为控制的关联
Br J Clin Psychol. 2017 Jun;56(2):172-188. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12132. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
3
Undoing the past in order to lie in the present: Counterfactual thinking and deceptive communication.为了活在当下而改写过去:反事实思维与欺骗性沟通。
Cognition. 2017 Apr;161:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
4
Differences in Behavior and Brain Activity during Hypothetical and Real Choices.假设性选择和实际选择过程中的行为及大脑活动差异。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jan;21(1):46-56. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
5
Improving Physical Task Performance with Counterfactual and Prefactual Thinking.运用反事实思维和预期思维提高身体任务表现。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 12;11(12):e0168181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168181. eCollection 2016.
6
Questioning the preparatory function of counterfactual thinking.质疑反事实思维的准备功能。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Feb;45(2):261-269. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0660-5.
7
Lies that feel honest: Dissociating between incentive and deviance processing when evaluating dishonesty.看似诚实的谎言:评估不诚实行为时激励与违规处理的分离
Biol Psychol. 2016 May;117:100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
8
Counterfactual Thought.反事实思维。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:135-57. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
9
Lying relies on the truth.谎言依赖于真相。
Cognition. 2014 Sep;132(3):324-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 22.
10
Improving the past and the future: a temporal asymmetry in hypothetical thinking.改善过去和未来:假设思考中的时间不对称性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):23-7. doi: 10.1037/a0027947. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

思辨思维的功能综述

A Review of Functions of Speculative Thinking.

作者信息

Huang Lun, Xie Yibo, Chen Xiaolin

机构信息

Management School, Hainan University, Haikou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 15;12:728946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728946. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728946
PMID:34721189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8554239/
Abstract

Speculative thinking refers to thinking about past or future possibilities; it includes counterfactual thinking, prefactual thinking, and other types. In this narrative review, we discuss the traditional function of speculative thinking in improving future performance (i.e., the preparatory function). We also explore several non-preparatory functions of speculative thinking that have not been widely covered, namely the functions of conveying information and of supporting lying. In addition, we address temporal asymmetry; one perspective focuses on psychological distance in speculative thinking about the past and future, while another focuses on temporal asymmetry and reality/hypothetical differences in the preparatory function of speculative thinking. Overall, this review suggests that a broader functional theory is needed to address non-preparatory functions and the traditional preparatory function. Such a theory should cover all speculative thinking about the past and future rather than simply counterfactual thinking.

摘要

推测性思维是指对过去或未来可能性的思考;它包括反事实思维、前事实思维和其他类型。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们讨论了推测性思维在提高未来表现方面的传统功能(即准备功能)。我们还探讨了推测性思维的几种尚未被广泛涵盖的非准备功能,即传达信息和支持说谎的功能。此外,我们探讨了时间不对称性;一种观点关注对过去和未来的推测性思维中的心理距离,而另一种观点则关注推测性思维准备功能中的时间不对称性以及现实/假设差异。总体而言,本综述表明需要一个更广泛的功能理论来处理非准备功能和传统的准备功能。这样的理论应该涵盖对过去和未来的所有推测性思维,而不仅仅是反事实思维。