• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌患者血清二氢嘧啶酶样3浓度及其诊断价值

Serum Dihydropyrimidinase-Like 3 Concentration in Patients with Gastric Cancer and Its Diagnostic Value.

作者信息

Zhong Huiqiu, Luo Xiaojiang

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang 330006, P.R. China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang 330006, P.R. China.

出版信息

Iran J Public Health. 2021 Sep;50(9):1789-1795. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i9.7051.

DOI:10.18502/ijph.v50i9.7051
PMID:34722374
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8542824/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the serum concentration of dihydropyrimidinase-like 3 (DPYSL3) in patients with gastric cancer and its clinical significance.

METHODS

Seventy four patients with gastric cancer from Wuhan Central Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China from October 2018 to April 2019 were selected as the case group. Sixty patients with normal gastric mucosa or mild non-atrophic gastritis were selected as the control group. Serum DPYSL3, CA72-4 and CEA concentrations were measured in both groups.

RESULTS

The serum DPYSL3 concentration in the case group was significantly higher than that in the healthy control group (22.04±9.22 vs. 8.36±4.19 μg/L, <0.001). The serum DPYSL3 concentration in patients with advanced gastric cancer was significantly higher than that in early gastric cancer (27.09±9.12 vs. 13.04±8.22 μg/L, <0.01); serum DPYSL3 concentration was significantly correlated with tumor size, TNM stage and differentiation (<0.05). When the cutoff value was 20.98 μg/L, the serum DPYSL3 concentration could differentiate the gastric cancer with ROC 0.882 (95% CI: 0.828-0.937) with sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 94%, respectively. Serum CA72-4 concentration could differentiate the gastric cancer from health controls with ROC 0.812 (95% CI: 0.734-0.834), serum CEA concentration could differentiate gastric cancer with ROC 0.612 (95% CI: 0.534 ∼ 0.634). The serum concentrations of DPYSL3, CA72-4 and CEA in gastric cancer patients were increased compared to health controls.

CONCLUSION

Three serological markers have complementary diagnostic value for gastric cancer. Serum DPYSL3 is a new potential molecular marker for gastric cancer.

摘要

背景

我们旨在研究胃癌患者血清中双氢嘧啶酶样3(DPYSL3)的浓度及其临床意义。

方法

选取2018年10月至2019年4月来自中国华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉中心医院的74例胃癌患者作为病例组。选取60例胃黏膜正常或轻度非萎缩性胃炎患者作为对照组。检测两组患者血清中DPYSL3、CA72-4和CEA的浓度。

结果

病例组血清DPYSL3浓度显著高于健康对照组(22.04±9.22 vs. 8.36±4.19 μg/L,<0.001)。进展期胃癌患者血清DPYSL3浓度显著高于早期胃癌患者(27.09±9.12 vs. 13.04±8.22 μg/L,<0.01);血清DPYSL3浓度与肿瘤大小、TNM分期及分化程度显著相关(<0.05)。当截断值为20.98 μg/L时,血清DPYSL3浓度诊断胃癌的ROC为0.882(95%CI:0.828-0.937),敏感性和特异性分别为75%和94%。血清CA72-4浓度诊断胃癌与健康对照的ROC为0.812(95%CI:0.734-0.834),血清CEA浓度诊断胃癌的ROC为0.612(95%CI:0.534~0.634)。与健康对照相比,胃癌患者血清中DPYSL3、CA72-4和CEA浓度均升高。

结论

三种血清学标志物对胃癌具有互补的诊断价值。血清DPYSL3是一种新的潜在胃癌分子标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/820b/8542824/8f972058e513/IJPH-50-1789-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/820b/8542824/8f972058e513/IJPH-50-1789-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/820b/8542824/8f972058e513/IJPH-50-1789-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Serum Dihydropyrimidinase-Like 3 Concentration in Patients with Gastric Cancer and Its Diagnostic Value.胃癌患者血清二氢嘧啶酶样3浓度及其诊断价值
Iran J Public Health. 2021 Sep;50(9):1789-1795. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i9.7051.
2
Diagnostic value of combined detection of CA72-4, CA19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen comparing to CA72-4 alone in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CA72-4、CA19-9和癌胚抗原联合检测与单独检测CA72-4在胃癌诊断中的价值:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Apr;11(4):848-856. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-537.
3
Serum levels of ANOS1 serve as a diagnostic biomarker of gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter observational study.血清 ANOS1 水平可作为胃癌的诊断生物标志物:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2020 Mar;23(2):203-211. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-00995-z. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
4
CA72-4 combined with CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the early diagnosis of gastric cancer.CA72-4联合癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原125(CA125)和糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)可提高胃癌早期诊断的敏感性。
Clin Chim Acta. 2014 Nov 1;437:183-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.07.034. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
5
Clinical evaluation of CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 and CA125 in gastric cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4和CA125在接受新辅助化疗的胃癌患者中的临床评估
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec 29;12:397. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-397.
6
Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for advanced gastric cancer with the first-line chemotherapy.血清肿瘤标志物在晚期胃癌一线化疗中的临床意义
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Dec;8(8):2680-2690. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.10.27.
7
Clinical assessment and prognostic evaluation of tumor markers in patients with gastric cancer.胃癌患者肿瘤标志物的临床评估与预后评价。
Int J Biol Markers. 2013 Jun 28;28(2):192-200. doi: 10.5301/jbm.5000023.
8
Value of Combined Detection of Serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9 and TSGF in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.血清癌胚抗原、糖类抗原72-4、糖类抗原19-9及肿瘤特异性生长因子联合检测在胃癌诊断中的价值
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(9):3867-70. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.9.3867.
9
Comparison of Serum CA72-4 and CEA Levels in Patient with Endoscopically Suspected Gastric Carcinoma.内镜检查疑似胃癌患者血清CA72-4与癌胚抗原水平的比较
Mymensingh Med J. 2015 Jul;24(3):542-9.
10
Value of Combined Detection of Serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9, CA15-3 and CA12-5 in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.血清癌胚抗原、糖类抗原72-4、糖类抗原19-9、糖类抗原15-3和糖类抗原12-5联合检测在胃癌诊断中的价值
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2017 May;47(3):260-263.

引用本文的文献

1
Knockdown of LINC00467 inhibits gastric cancer progression by modulating the sequestration of miR-141-3p.LINC00467的敲低通过调节miR-141-3p的隔离来抑制胃癌进展。
Oncol Lett. 2025 Jul 24;30(4):459. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.15205. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
The 'double‑track sign': A novel CT finding suggestive of the diagnosis of T1a gastric cancer.“双轨征”:一种提示T1a期胃癌诊断的新型CT表现。
Oncol Lett. 2023 May 19;26(1):286. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.13872. eCollection 2023 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
DPYSL3 modulates mitosis, migration, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in claudin-low breast cancer.DPYSL3 调节 Claudin-low 型乳腺癌中的有丝分裂、迁移和上皮间质转化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 18;115(51):E11978-E11987. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810598115. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
2
Current and future biomarkers in gastric cancer.胃癌的当前和未来生物标志物。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2018 Jul;103:1688-1700. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.04.178. Epub 2018 May 14.
3
An assessment of candidate genes to assist prognosis in gastric cancer.
评估用于辅助胃癌预后判断的候选基因。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Apr;9(2):303-310. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.01.05.
4
Value of Combined Detection of Serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9, CA15-3 and CA12-5 in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.血清癌胚抗原、糖类抗原72-4、糖类抗原19-9、糖类抗原15-3和糖类抗原12-5联合检测在胃癌诊断中的价值
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2017 May;47(3):260-263.
5
Review of recent molecular landscape knowledge of gastric cancer.近期胃癌分子格局知识综述。
Histol Histopathol. 2018 Jan;33(1):11-26. doi: 10.14670/HH-11-898. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
6
Molecular mechanisms of peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer.胃癌腹膜播散的分子机制
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug 14;22(30):6829-40. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i30.6829.
7
Collapsin response mediator protein 4 isoforms (CRMP4a and CRMP4b) have opposite effects on cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in gastric cancer.塌陷反应介导蛋白4亚型(CRMP4a和CRMP4b)对胃癌细胞的增殖、迁移和侵袭具有相反的作用。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 30;16:565. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2593-6.
8
Clinical significance and diagnostic value of serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in patients with gastric cancer.血清癌胚抗原、糖类抗原19-9及糖类抗原72-4在胃癌患者中的临床意义及诊断价值
Oncotarget. 2016 Aug 2;7(31):49565-49573. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10391.
9
The Influence of Gastric Cancer Screening on the Stage at Diagnosis and Survival: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies in the Far East.胃癌筛查对诊断分期及生存的影响:远东地区比较研究的荟萃分析
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;50(3):190-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000466.
10
Recent advances in the molecular diagnostics of gastric cancer.胃癌分子诊断的最新进展
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 14;21(34):9838-52. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9838.