Department of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Trauma Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Jun;48(3):2135-2144. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01835-5. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
To evaluate healthcare utilization and satisfaction with treatment before and after implementing direct discharge (DD) from the Emergency Department (ED) of patients with simple, stable musculoskeletal injuries.
Patients with simple, stable musculoskeletal injuries were included in two Dutch hospitals, both level-2 trauma centers: OLVG and Sint Antonius (SA), before (pre-DD-cohort) and after implementing DD (DD-cohort). With DD, no routine follow-up appointments are scheduled after the ED visit, supported by information leaflets, a smartphone application and a telephone helpline. Outcomes included: secondary healthcare utilization (follow-up appointments and X-ray/CT/MRI); satisfaction with treatment (scale 1-10); primary healthcare utilization (general practitioner (GP) or physiotherapist visited, yes/no). Linear regression was used to compare secondary healthcare utilization for all patients and per injury subgroup. Satisfaction and primary healthcare utilization were analyzed descriptively.
A total of 2033 (OLVG = 1686; SA = 347) and 1616 (OLVG = 1396; SA = 220) patients were included in the pre-DD-cohort and DD-cohort, respectively. After DD, the mean number of follow-up appointments per patient reduced by 1.06 (1.13-0.99; p < 0.001) in OLVG and 1.07 (1.02-0.93; p < 0.001) in SA. Follow-up appointments reduced significantly for all injury subgroups. Mean number of follow-up X-rays per patient reduced by 0.17 in OLVG (p < 0.001) and 0.18 in SA (p < 0.001). Numbers of CT/MRI scans were low and comparable. In OLVG, mean satisfaction with treatment was 8.1 (pre-DD-cohort) versus 7.95 (DD-cohort), versus 7.75 in SA (DD-cohort only). In OLVG, 23.6% of pre-DD-cohort patients visited their GP, versus 26.1% in the DD-cohort, versus 13.3% in SA (DD-cohort only). Physiotherapist use was comparable.
This study performed in a large population and additional hospital confirms earlier pilot results, i.e., that DD has the potential to effectively reduce healthcare utilization, while maintaining high levels of satisfaction.
II.
评估实施急诊科(ED)直接出院(DD)前后单纯稳定型肌肉骨骼损伤患者的治疗医疗保健利用情况和满意度。
荷兰两家 2 级创伤中心——OLVG 和 Sint Antonius(SA)的单纯稳定型肌肉骨骼损伤患者分别纳入两个队列,分别为实施 DD 前(预 DD 队列)和实施 DD 后(DD 队列)。采用 DD 后,ED 就诊后不再安排常规随访预约,而是提供信息传单、智能手机应用程序和电话热线。结果包括:二级医疗保健利用情况(随访预约和 X 光/CT/MRI);治疗满意度(1-10 分);初级保健利用情况(全科医生(GP)或物理治疗师就诊,是/否)。使用线性回归比较所有患者和每个损伤亚组的二级医疗保健利用情况。满意度和初级保健利用情况采用描述性分析。
预 DD 队列和 DD 队列分别纳入 2033 名(OLVG=1686;SA=347)和 1616 名(OLVG=1396;SA=220)患者。DD 后,OLVG 每位患者的平均随访预约次数减少 1.06(1.13-0.99;p<0.001),SA 减少 1.07(1.02-0.93;p<0.001)。所有损伤亚组的随访预约次数均显著减少。OLVG 每位患者的平均随访 X 射线次数减少 0.17(p<0.001),SA 减少 0.18(p<0.001)。CT/MRI 扫描数量较低且相当。OLVG 治疗满意度平均为 8.1(预 DD 队列),7.95(DD 队列),SA 仅为 7.75(DD 队列)。OLVG 中,23.6%的预 DD 队列患者就诊于 GP,DD 队列为 26.1%,SA 仅为 13.3%(DD 队列)。物理治疗师的使用情况相当。
本研究在较大人群中进行,并在另一家医院进行了补充,证实了早期试点研究的结果,即 DD 有可能有效减少医疗保健利用,同时保持高满意度。
II 级。