Kåredal Monica, Jönsson Rebecca, Wetterling Maria, Björk Birgitta, Hedmer Maria
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2022 Jan;19(1):50-66. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2021.2000617. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
The main objective was to develop a wipe sampling test to measure surface contamination of the most frequently used antineoplastic drugs (ADs) in Swedish healthcare and, furthermore, to develop an analysis method sensitive enough to assess low levels of contamination. Two wipe sampling tests with separate sample processing methods assessing (i) cyclophosphamide (CP), ifosfamide (IF), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), etoposide (ETO), gemcitabine (GEM) and cytarabine (CYT) (Wipe Test 1); and (ii) GEM, CYT and methotrexate (MTX) (Wipe Test 2), respectively, were developed by optimization of absorption and extraction efficiencies using different wipe tissue materials, tissue wetting solution, and extraction solvents. A fast liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method was developed for simultaneous detection of the studied ADs. The limit of quantification for the method was between 0.04 to 2.4 ng/wipe sample (0.10 to 6.1 pg/cm for an area of 400 cm) and at 50 ng/sample the within-day precision was between 1.3 and 15%, and the accuracy between 102 and 127%. Wipe Test 1 was applied in an assessment of cleaning efficiency of five different cleaning solutions (formic acid, water, sodium hydroxide, ethanol, and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) for removal of ADs from surfaces made of stainless steel or plastic. For CP, IF, 5-FU, GEM, and CYT 92% of the AD were removed regardless of surface and cleaning solution. In conclusion, a user-friendly assessment method to measure low levels of seven ADs in the work environment was developed and validated. Assessment of the decontamination efficiency of cleaning solutions concerning removal of ADs from stainless steel showed that efficiencies differed depending on the AD with water being the least effective cleaning agent. The results suggests that a combination of different cleaning agents including detergent and a solution with an organic component would be optimal to efficiently remove the measured ADs from surfaces in the workplace.
主要目标是开发一种擦拭取样测试方法,以测量瑞典医疗保健机构中最常用的抗肿瘤药物(ADs)的表面污染情况,此外,还要开发一种灵敏度足够高的分析方法,以评估低水平的污染。通过使用不同的擦拭组织材料、组织湿润溶液和萃取溶剂,优化吸收和萃取效率,分别开发了两种具有独立样品处理方法的擦拭取样测试:(i)评估环磷酰胺(CP)、异环磷酰胺(IF)、5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)、依托泊苷(ETO)、吉西他滨(GEM)和阿糖胞苷(CYT)的擦拭测试1;(ii)评估吉西他滨、阿糖胞苷和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)的擦拭测试2。开发了一种快速液相色谱串联质谱法,用于同时检测所研究的抗肿瘤药物。该方法的定量限为每擦拭样品0.04至2.4 ng(对于400 cm²的面积,为0.10至6.1 pg/cm²),在50 ng/样品时,日内精密度在1.3%至15%之间,准确度在102%至127%之间。擦拭测试1用于评估五种不同清洁溶液(甲酸、水、氢氧化钠、乙醇和十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS))从不锈钢或塑料表面去除抗肿瘤药物的清洁效率。对于CP、IF、5-FU、GEM和CYT,无论表面和清洁溶液如何,92%的抗肿瘤药物都能被去除。总之,开发并验证了一种用于测量工作环境中低水平七种抗肿瘤药物的用户友好型评估方法。关于从不锈钢表面去除抗肿瘤药物的清洁溶液去污效率评估表明,效率因抗肿瘤药物而异,水是最无效的清洁剂。结果表明,包括洗涤剂和含有有机成分的溶液在内的不同清洁剂组合,对于从工作场所表面有效去除所测量的抗肿瘤药物将是最佳的。