School of Public Administration, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Hunan Institute of Engineering, Xiangtan, Hunan Province, China.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 1;16(11):e0259356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259356. eCollection 2021.
The transformation of China's economy from extensive growth to high-quality development is essentially an increase in green total factor productivity (GTFP). China currently has a range of environmental regulation tools, and the question of whether environmental regulation can promote improvement in China's GTFP requires theoretical and empirical analysis. This article first divides environmental regulation into three types: administrative, market-based and information-based. It then builds an empirical model of the effect of environmental regulation on GTFP. Slacks based measure-data envelope analysis (SBM-DEA) and the Malmquist index are used to measure the GTFP of 30 provinces in China from 2005 to 2018, and a measurement model of the impact of environmental regulation on GTFP is established. The results show that: (1) there are significant differences in GTFP in eastern, central and western China; (2) there is a non-linear relationship between environmental regulations and GTFP.
中国经济从粗放增长向高质量发展的转变,本质上是绿色全要素生产率(GTFP)的提高。中国目前拥有一系列环境规制工具,环境规制能否促进中国GTFP 的提高需要理论和经验分析。本文首先将环境规制分为行政、市场和信息三种类型,然后建立了环境规制对 GTFP 影响的实证模型。利用基于松弛的度量-数据包络分析(SBM-DEA)和 Malmquist 指数,测算了 2005 年至 2018 年中国 30 个省份的 GTFP,并建立了环境规制对 GTFP 影响的计量模型。结果表明:(1)东、中、西部地区 GTFP 存在显著差异;(2)环境规制与 GTFP 之间存在非线性关系。