Sabrina J. Poon (
Christopher J. D. Wallis is an assistant professor in the Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. At the time this work was conducted, he was a fellow in the Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Nov;40(11):1688-1696. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00094.
During the past two decades several policies have attempted to replace inappropriate hospital inpatient stays with observation hospital stays, where patients receive hospital care but are classified as outpatients. The Two-Midnight rule, adopted in October 2013 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, states that more highly reimbursed inpatient payment is appropriate if care is expected to last at least two midnights; otherwise, observation stays should be used. For hospitals, the administrative burden associated with making these status determinations is substantial. We found that after the Two-Midnight rule was implemented, potentially inappropriate short inpatient stays decreased immediately by 2.0 stays per 1,000 beneficiaries and potentially more appropriate short outpatient stays increased immediately by 1.8 stays per 1,000 beneficiaries, hastening a preexisting trend in this direction. However, after this initial improvement, the rate of change slowed to a new steady state. Given the steady state and ongoing administrative resources needed, it is time to reconsider the value of status determination required by the Two-Midnight rule.
在过去的二十年中,已经出台了多项政策,试图将不合适的住院治疗转变为观察治疗,即患者接受住院治疗,但被归类为门诊患者。2013 年 10 月,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)通过了“两夜规则”,规定如果预计治疗时间至少持续两个半夜,则应采用支付费用更高的住院治疗;否则,应采用观察治疗。对于医院来说,进行这些状态判定的行政负担非常大。我们发现,“两夜规则”实施后,每千名受益人的潜在不合理短期住院治疗立即减少了 2.0 次,潜在更合适的短期门诊治疗立即增加了 1.8 次,这加速了这一趋势的发展。然而,在最初的改善之后,变化的速度放缓至一个新的稳定状态。鉴于稳定状态和持续的行政资源需求,是时候重新考虑“两夜规则”所要求的状态判定的价值了。