Suppr超能文献

成人纵隔肿块、麻醉干预和气道压迫:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Mediastinal Masses, Anesthetic Interventions, and Airway Compression in Adults: A Prospective Observational Study.

机构信息

Departments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2022 Jan 1;136(1):104-114. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004011.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Central airway occlusion is a feared complication of general anesthesia in patients with mediastinal masses. Maintenance of spontaneous ventilation and avoiding neuromuscular blockade are recommended to reduce this risk. Physiologic arguments supporting these recommendations are controversial and direct evidence is lacking. The authors hypothesized that, in adult patients with moderate to severe mediastinal mass-mediated tracheobronchial compression, anesthetic interventions including positive pressure ventilation and neuromuscular blockade could be instituted without compromising central airway patency.

METHODS

Seventeen adult patients with large mediastinal masses requiring general anesthesia underwent awake intubation followed by continuous video bronchoscopy recordings of the compromised portion of the airway during staged induction. Assessments of changes in anterior-posterior airway diameter relative to baseline (awake, spontaneous ventilation) were performed using the following patency scores: unchanged = 0; 25 to 50% larger = +1; more than 50% larger = +2; 25 to 50% smaller = -1; more than 50% smaller = -2. Assessments were made by seven experienced bronchoscopists in side-by-side blinded and scrambled comparisons between (1) baseline awake, spontaneous breathing; (2) anesthetized with spontaneous ventilation; (3) anesthetized with positive pressure ventilation; and (4) anesthetized with positive pressure ventilation and neuromuscular blockade. Tidal volumes, respiratory rate, and inspiratory/expiratory ratio were similar between phases.

RESULTS

No significant change from baseline was observed in the mean airway patency scores after the induction of general anesthesia (0 [95% CI, 0 to 0]; P = 0.953). The mean airway patency score increased with the addition of positive pressure ventilation (0 [95% CI, 0 to 1]; P = 0.024) and neuromuscular blockade (1 [95% CI, 0 to 1]; P < 0.001). No patient suffered airway collapse or difficult ventilation during any anesthetic phase.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations suggest a need to reassess prevailing assumptions regarding positive pressure ventilation and/or paralysis and mediastinal mass-mediated airway collapse, but do not prove that conventional (nonstaged) inductions are safe for such patients.

摘要

背景

纵隔肿块患者全身麻醉时,中央气道阻塞是一种可怕的并发症。为降低这种风险,建议维持自主呼吸并避免使用神经肌肉阻滞剂。支持这些建议的生理学论点存在争议,并且缺乏直接证据。作者假设,在中度至重度纵隔肿块引起的气管支气管压迫的成年患者中,在不影响中央气道通畅的情况下,可以进行包括正压通气和神经肌肉阻滞在内的麻醉干预。

方法

17 名需要全身麻醉的大纵隔肿块患者接受了清醒插管,然后在分期诱导期间对气道受损部位进行连续视频支气管镜检查。使用以下通畅评分评估与基线(清醒,自主通气)相比,前后气道直径的变化:无变化=0;增加 25%至 50%=+1;增加 50%以上=+2;减少 25%至 50%=-1;减少 50%以上=-2。由 7 名经验丰富的支气管镜医师在面对面的盲法和混淆比较中进行评估,比较内容为:(1)基线清醒,自主呼吸;(2)麻醉后自主通气;(3)麻醉后正压通气;(4)麻醉后正压通气和神经肌肉阻滞。各阶段的潮气量、呼吸频率和吸呼比相似。

结果

在全身麻醉诱导后,平均气道通畅评分与基线相比无显著变化(0 [95%置信区间,0 至 0];P=0.953)。正压通气(0 [95%置信区间,0 至 1];P=0.024)和神经肌肉阻滞(1 [95%置信区间,0 至 1];P<0.001)的加入使平均气道通畅评分增加。在任何麻醉阶段,均未发生气道塌陷或通气困难。

结论

这些观察结果表明,需要重新评估关于正压通气和/或麻痹与纵隔肿块引起的气道塌陷的普遍假设,但并不能证明常规(非分期)诱导对这些患者是安全的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验