• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围癌的长期疗效相似:一项病例匹配的对比研究。

The long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma showed similar survival: a case-matched comparative study.

机构信息

Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, DMU DIGEST, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.

Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4732-4740. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08813-3. Epub 2021 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08813-3
PMID:34724575
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared the oncological benefit of laparoscopic (LPD) and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) for ampullary carcinoma. The aim of this study was to compare the oncological results of these two approaches.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2020, 103 patients who underwent PD for ampullary carcinoma, including 31 LPD and 72 OPD, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were matched on a 1:2 basis for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, and preoperative biliary drainage. Short- and long-term outcomes of LPD and OPD were compared.

RESULTS

The 31 LPD were matched (1:2) to 62 OPD. LPD was associated with a shorter operative time (298 vs. 341 min, p = 0.02) than OPD and similar blood loss (361 vs. 341 mL, p = 0.747), but with more intra- and post-operative transfusions (29 vs. 8%, p = 0.008). There was no significant difference in postoperative mortality (6 vs. 2%), grades B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (22 vs. 21%), delayed gastric emptying (23 vs. 35%), bleeding (22 vs. 11%), Clavien ≥ III morbidity (22 vs. 19%), or the length of hospital stay (26 vs. 21 days) between LPD and OPD, respectively, but there were more reinterventions (22 vs. 5%, p = 0.009). Pathological characteristics were similar for tumor size (21 vs. 22 mm), well differentiated tumors (41 vs. 38%), the number of harvested (23 vs. 26) or invaded lymph nodes (48 vs. 52%), R0 resection (84 vs. 90%), and other subtypes (T1/2, T3/4, phenotype). With a comparable mean follow-up (41 vs. 37 months, p = 0.59), there was no difference in 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall (p = 0.725) or recurrence-free survival (p = 0.155) which were (93, 74, 67% vs. 97, 79, 76%) and (85, 58, 58% vs. 90, 73, 73%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study showed a similar long-term oncological results between LPD and OPD for ampullary carcinoma. However, the higher morbidity observed with LPD compared to OPD, restricting its use to experienced centers.

摘要

背景

很少有研究比较腹腔镜(LPD)和开腹胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)治疗壶腹癌的肿瘤学获益。本研究旨在比较这两种方法的肿瘤学结果。

方法

2011 年至 2020 年,共 103 例壶腹癌患者接受 PD 治疗,其中 31 例行 LPD,72 例行 OPD。根据年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会评分和术前胆道引流情况,将患者按 1:2 进行匹配。比较 LPD 和 OPD 的短期和长期结局。

结果

31 例 LPD 与 62 例 OPD 进行匹配(1:2)。与 OPD 相比,LPD 手术时间更短(298 分钟 vs. 341 分钟,p=0.02),出血量相似(361 毫升 vs. 341 毫升,p=0.747),但术中术后输血更多(29% vs. 8%,p=0.008)。两组术后死亡率(6% vs. 2%)、术后 B/C 级胰瘘(22% vs. 21%)、胃排空延迟(23% vs. 35%)、出血(22% vs. 11%)、Clavien≥III 级发病率(22% vs. 19%)或住院时间(26 天 vs. 21 天)均无显著差异,但再手术率(22% vs. 5%,p=0.009)更高。肿瘤大小(21 毫米 vs. 22 毫米)、高分化肿瘤(41% vs. 38%)、采集的淋巴结数量(23 个 vs. 26 个)或侵袭性淋巴结(48 个 vs. 52 个)、R0 切除(84% vs. 90%)和其他亚型(T1/2、T3/4、表型)的病理特征相似。在相似的平均随访(41 个月 vs. 37 个月,p=0.59)下,1 年、3 年和 5 年的总生存率(p=0.725)和无复发生存率(p=0.155)无差异(93%、74%、67% vs. 97%、79%、76%)和(85%、58%、58% vs. 90%、73%、73%)。

结论

本研究表明,腹腔镜和开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹癌的长期肿瘤学结果相似。然而,与 OPD 相比,LPD 术后发病率更高,限制了其在经验丰富的中心的应用。

相似文献

1
The long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma showed similar survival: a case-matched comparative study.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围癌的长期疗效相似:一项病例匹配的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4732-4740. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08813-3. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
2
Perioperative and Long-term Oncological Results of Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy as Hybrid Technique - A Matched Pair Analysis of 120 Cases.微创胰十二指肠切除术作为混合技术的围手术期及长期肿瘤学结果——120例配对分析
Zentralbl Chir. 2018 Apr;143(2):155-161. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124374. Epub 2018 May 2.
3
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺或壶腹周围肿瘤:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;6(6):438-447. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00054-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
4
Morbidity and survival after laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: propensity score matched comparison.腹腔镜与开放胰十二指肠切除术后的发病率和生存率:倾向评分匹配比较
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 10;408(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02758-y.
5
Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary cancer: A retrospective study.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围癌的回顾性研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Jul;17(3):e13350. doi: 10.1111/ases.13350.
6
A matched-pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes using Leeds Pathology Protocol.腹腔镜与开放胰十二指肠切除术的配对分析:采用利兹病理方案的肿瘤学结局
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2014 Aug;13(4):435-41. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(14)60048-5.
7
Long-term quality of life is better after laparoscopic compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy.与开腹胰十二指肠切除术相比,腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的长期生活质量更好。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):769-779. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10581-1. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
8
Totally laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: A propensity score matching analysis of short-term outcomes.全腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术:短期结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;47(3 Pt B):674-680. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.036. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
9
Postoperative Bleeding After Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: the Achilles' Heel?腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后的出血:阿喀琉斯之踵?
World J Surg. 2018 Apr;42(4):1138-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4269-z.
10
Expanding laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy to pancreatic-head and periampullary malignancy: major findings based on systematic review and meta-analysis.扩大腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰头和壶腹周围恶性肿瘤:基于系统评价和荟萃分析的主要发现
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0830-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Iodine-125 brachytherapy in inoperable duodenal papilla carcinoma: a case report series.碘-125近距离放射治疗不可切除十二指肠乳头癌:病例报告系列
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 10;14:1394178. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1394178. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of distal cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜与开放胰十二指肠切除术治疗远端胆管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 18;12:1057337. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1057337. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
ASO Author Reflections: Pathologic Complete Response of Extended CROSS Criteria Patients with Esophageal Cancer.ASO作者反思:符合扩展CROSS标准的食管癌患者的病理完全缓解
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;28(7):3961-3962. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09438-x. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
2
Quality of life and patient satisfaction after single- and multiport laparoscopic surgery in colon cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (SIMPLE Trial).结肠癌单孔与多孔腹腔镜手术后的生活质量和患者满意度:一项多中心随机对照试验(SIMPLE试验)
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6278-6290. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08128-9. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
3
Long-term natural history after endoscopic resection for gastric dysplasia.
内镜切除治疗胃发育不良的长期自然病程。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5247-5255. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08023-3. Epub 2020 Sep 28.