Katte Jean-Claude, Kengne Andre-Pascal, Tchapmi Donald, Agoons Batakeh B, Nyirenda Moffat, Mbacham Wilfried, Sobngwi Eugene
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, CMR.
Department of Medicine, Non-Communicable Diseases Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, ZAF.
Cureus. 2021 Sep 28;13(9):e18357. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18357. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Objective Inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin have been shown to be independent markers of cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to assess the correlation between serum levels of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes. Methods We carried out a cross-sectional study at a tertiary level reference hospital in Yaounde, Cameroon. We assessed the cardiovascular risk using the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) cardiovascular risk prediction model in 80 adults with type 2 diabetes. Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein were measured in 80 and 76 subjects respectively, using a highly sensitive quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Correlations were examined using Spearman's rank correlation test and the correlation coefficients were compared using the Z-test statistic. Results Females represented the majority of the study population (62.5%). The median duration of diabetes was 5 (3-10) years and 62.5% of participants had a high cardiovascular risk score. Median serum procalcitonin levels was significantly higher in females compared to male participants: 2.48 (1.76-3.01 ng/mL) vs 1.42 (0.86-1.87 ng/mL); p<0.001. There was no difference in the serum C-reactive protein levels between females and males: 1.20 (0.33-3.33) mg/L vs 0.85 (0.36-2.77) mg/L; p=0.669. Procalcitonin was moderately correlated with cardiovascular risk (r=0.58, p<0.001). The correlation was slightly higher in females (R=0.56, p<0.001) versus males (R=0.49, p=0.005) although not significantly different (Z-statistic=0.734, p=0.463). Serum C-reactive protein did not show a meaningful correlation with cardiovascular risk (R=0.23, p=0.050). At a threshold of 2 ng/ml, serum procalcitonin identified participants with a high cardiovascular risk score, with a sensitivity and specificity of 64% and 80% respectively. Conclusion Compared to C-reactive protein, procalcitonin may be a better surrogate marker for cardiovascular risk prediction in this population with type 2 diabetes.
目的 诸如C反应蛋白和降钙素原等炎症标志物已被证明是心血管疾病的独立标志物。我们旨在评估2型糖尿病患者血清降钙素原、C反应蛋白水平与心血管风险之间的相关性。方法 我们在喀麦隆雅温得的一家三级参考医院开展了一项横断面研究。我们使用糖尿病和血管疾病行动:培哚普利吲达帕胺片和二甲双胍缓释片对照评估(ADVANCE)心血管风险预测模型,对80名2型糖尿病成年患者的心血管风险进行了评估。分别采用高灵敏度定量酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法,对80名和76名受试者的血清降钙素原和C反应蛋白进行了检测。使用Spearman等级相关检验来检查相关性,并使用Z检验统计量比较相关系数。结果 女性占研究人群的大多数(62.5%)。糖尿病的中位病程为5(3 - 10)年,62.5%的参与者有高心血管风险评分。女性参与者的血清降钙素原中位数水平显著高于男性:2.48(1.76 - 3.01 ng/mL)对1.42(0.86 - 1.87 ng/mL);p<0.001。女性和男性的血清C反应蛋白水平无差异:1.20(0.33 - 3.33)mg/L对0.85(0.36 - 2.77)mg/L;p = 0.669。降钙素原与心血管风险呈中度相关(r = 0.58,p<0.001)。女性(R = 0.56,p<0.001)与男性(R = 0.49,p = 0.005)的相关性虽无显著差异(Z统计量 = 0.734,p = 0.463),但女性的相关性略高。血清C反应蛋白与心血管风险无显著相关性(R = 0.23,p = 0.050)。血清降钙素原在阈值为2 ng/ml时,识别出高心血管风险评分参与者的灵敏度和特异性分别为64%和80%。结论 与C反应蛋白相比,降钙素原可能是该2型糖尿病患者人群心血管风险预测的更好替代标志物。