Suppr超能文献

通过炎症标志物识别急性未分化发热的可能病因。

Identifying the Probable Etiology of Acute Undifferentiated Fever through Inflammatory Markers.

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Air Force Central Medical Establishment (AFCME), Delhi, India, Corresponding Author.

Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Military Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

J Assoc Physicians India. 2024 May;72(5):13-16. doi: 10.59556/japi.72.0523.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute undifferentiated fever (AUF) is defined as any febrile illness with a duration of ≤14 days without evidence of localized infection. Most outpatient services and a significant inpatient load in India are contributed by AUF. COVID-19 has recently added to the existing list of common etiologies of AUF. While the rapid diagnostic test (RDT) kits, which are widely used for the detection of common etiologies of AUF, are unreliable, the rise of various inflammatory markers may help identify the probable etiology. This not only results in better diagnosis but also prepares the physician for close monitoring and pooling of resources.

AIM

To identify the probable etiology of AUF through inflammatory markers.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the clinical and biochemical parameters as possible predictors of adverse outcomes in AUF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational study carried out in the Department of Medicine in a tertiary care hospital. The total duration of the study was 1 year. A total of 400 AUF patients [both outpatient department (OPD) and inpatient department (IPD)] fulfilling the eligibility criteria were taken up for the study after consent. Various inflammatory markers, namely erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, ferritin, and procalcitonin levels along with basic blood and biochemical tests were measured in all qualifying patients at their first visit. The level of rise of all the measured inflammatory markers was analyzed for clues toward identifying the etiology. Also, the possible predictors of adverse outcomes, as defined in the study, were analyzed. Outcome variables are described as mean ± standard deviation. All statistical calculations were done using computer programs Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft Corporation, New York, United States of America) and SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions; SPSS Inc., United States of America) version 21.

RESULTS

The common etiologies in our study contributing to AUF were dengue (31.5%), COVID-19 (18.5%), enteric fever (12.7%), scrub typhus (9.0%), and malaria (6.0%). In 76 cases (19%), the fever was undiagnosed. Enteric fever had highly elevated CRP (>30 mg/L) and moderately elevated D-dimer, ferritin, and procalcitonin. Both nonsevere dengue and COVID-19 had highly elevated D-dimer (>750 ng/mL), but in nonsevere dengue, CRP, ferritin, and procalcitonin were only mildly elevated, whereas in COVID-19, CRP and ferritin were moderately elevated with mildly elevated procalcitonin. Scrub typhus had highly elevated CRP and ferritin [more than four times the upper limit of normal (ULN)], but D-dimer and procalcitonin were only mildly elevated. The mean serum procalcitonin level in enteric fever is significantly higher than the other etiologies of AUF. Our study was correctly able to identify 90.8% of nonsevere dengue, 87.8% of typhoid, 83.6% of COVID-19, and 91.4% of scrub typhus patients based on the inflammatory markers level. Obesity, diabetes (both types 1 and 2), hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD), malignancy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and chronic lung disease were significantly associated with adverse outcomes. A significant delay in visiting the hospital after the onset of fever was found in all etiologies of AUF, which had adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our study is one of the few studies comparing the rise in the level of various inflammatory markers among the common etiologies of AUF. The novelty of the study is that it aids in identifying the probable etiology of AUF with good confidence through the levels of inflammatory markers. Also, our study highlights the high-risk factors associated with adverse outcomes in AUF.

摘要

背景

急性未分化发热(AUF)被定义为任何发热性疾病,持续时间≤14 天,无局部感染证据。印度大多数门诊服务和大量住院病人都由 AUF 贡献。COVID-19 最近增加了 AUF 的常见病因。虽然广泛用于检测 AUF 常见病因的快速诊断检测试剂盒(RDT)不可靠,但各种炎症标志物的升高可能有助于确定可能的病因。这不仅有助于更好地诊断,而且还为医生进行密切监测和资源汇集做好准备。

目的

通过炎症标志物确定 AUF 的可能病因。

目标

了解 AUF 中可能的不良结局的临床和生化参数预测。

材料和方法

这是一项在三级保健医院内科进行的前瞻性观察性研究。研究总持续时间为 1 年。在征得同意后,共纳入了 400 名符合条件的 AUF 患者[包括门诊(OPD)和住院患者(IPD)]进行研究。所有符合条件的患者在首次就诊时均进行了各种炎症标志物(红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C 反应蛋白(CRP)、D-二聚体、铁蛋白和降钙素原水平)以及基本血液和生化检查。分析所有测量的炎症标志物的升高水平,以寻找确定病因的线索。此外,还分析了研究中定义的可能的不良结局预测因素。结果变量描述为平均值±标准差。所有统计计算均使用计算机程序 Microsoft Excel 2007(Microsoft Corporation,美国纽约州)和 SPSS(Statistical Product and Service Solutions;SPSS Inc.,美国)版本 21 进行。

结果

在我们的研究中,导致 AUF 的常见病因是登革热(31.5%)、COVID-19(18.5%)、肠热(12.7%)、恙虫病(9.0%)和疟疾(6.0%)。在 76 例(19%)患者中,发热原因不明。肠热具有高度升高的 CRP(>30mg/L)和中度升高的 D-二聚体、铁蛋白和降钙素原。非重症登革热和 COVID-19 均具有高度升高的 D-二聚体(>750ng/mL),但在非重症登革热中,CRP、铁蛋白和降钙素原仅轻度升高,而在 COVID-19 中,CRP 和铁蛋白中度升高,降钙素原轻度升高。恙虫病具有高度升高的 CRP 和铁蛋白[高于正常值上限(ULN)的四倍以上],但 D-二聚体和降钙素原仅轻度升高。肠热患者的血清降钙素原水平明显高于 AUF 的其他病因。我们的研究能够根据炎症标志物水平正确识别 90.8%的非重症登革热、87.8%的伤寒、83.6%的 COVID-19 和 91.4%的恙虫病患者。肥胖、1 型和 2 型糖尿病、高血压、冠心病(CAD)、恶性肿瘤、慢性肾脏病(CKD)和慢性肺病与不良结局显著相关。在所有具有不良结局的 AUF 病因中,都发现了发热后就诊时间明显延迟。

结论

我们的研究是为数不多的比较 AUF 常见病因中各种炎症标志物升高水平的研究之一。该研究的新颖之处在于,它通过炎症标志物水平有助于对 AUF 的可能病因有较好的信心进行识别。此外,我们的研究还强调了 AUF 中与不良结局相关的高危因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验