Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute Düsseldorf (CARID) Heinrich Heine University Medical Center Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany.
Institute for Clinical Pharmacology University Medical Center GöttingenGeorg-August University Göttingen Germany.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):e022299. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022299. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
Background Pain is a major issue in our aging society. Dipyrone (metamizole) is one of the most frequently used analgesics. Additionally, it has been shown to impair pharmacodynamic response to aspirin as measured by platelet function tests. However, it is not known how this laboratory effect translates to clinical outcome. Methods and Results We conducted a nationwide analysis of a health insurance database in Germany comprising 9.2 million patients. All patients with a cardiovascular event in 2014 and subsequent secondary prevention with aspirin were followed up for 36 months. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was conducted to investigate the rate of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke/transient ischemic attack between patients on aspirin-dipyrone co-medication compared with aspirin-alone medication. Permanent aspirin-alone medication was given to 26,200 patients, and 5946 patients received aspirin-dipyrone co-medication. In the inverse probability of treatment weighted sample, excess mortality in aspirin-dipyrone co-medicated patients was observed (15.6% in aspirin-only group versus 24.4% in the co-medicated group, hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.56-1.76], <0.0001). Myocardial infarction and stroke/transient ischemic attack were increased as well (myocardial infarction: 1370 [5.2%] versus 355 [5.9%] in aspirin-only and co-medicated groups, respectively; HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.05-1.32]; =0.0066, relative risk [RR], 1.14; number needed to harm, 140. Stroke/transient ischemic attack, 1901 [7.3%] versus 506 [8.5%] in aspirin-only and co-medicated groups, respectively; HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.11-1.35]; <0.0001, RR, 1.17, number needed to harm, 82). Conclusions In this observational, nationwide analysis, aspirin and dipyrone co-medication was associated with excess mortality. This was in part driven by ischemic events (myocardial infarction and stroke), which occurred more frequently in co-medicated patients as well. Hence, dipyrone should be used with caution in aspirin-treated patients for secondary prevention.
疼痛是我们老龄化社会的一个主要问题。双氯芬酸(麦角胺)是最常使用的镇痛药之一。此外,它已被证明会影响血小板功能测试测量的阿司匹林药效反应。然而,目前尚不清楚这种实验室效应如何转化为临床结果。
我们对德国一个医疗保险数据库进行了全国性分析,该数据库包含 920 万患者。所有在 2014 年发生心血管事件并随后接受阿司匹林二级预防的患者均随访 36 个月。采用逆概率治疗加权分析(inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis)比较阿司匹林-双氯芬酸联合用药与单独使用阿司匹林患者的死亡率、心肌梗死和卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作的发生率。26200 例患者给予单独使用阿司匹林治疗,5946 例患者给予阿司匹林-双氯芬酸联合用药。在逆概率治疗加权样本中,观察到阿司匹林-双氯芬酸联合用药患者的死亡率过高(阿司匹林单独用药组为 15.6%,联合用药组为 24.4%,危险比[HR]为 1.66[95%CI,1.56-1.76],<0.0001)。心肌梗死和卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作的发生率也有所增加(心肌梗死:阿司匹林单独用药组为 1370 例[5.2%],联合用药组为 355 例[5.9%];HR,1.18[95%CI,1.05-1.32];=0.0066,相对危险度[RR],1.14;危害人数,140。卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作:阿司匹林单独用药组为 1901 例[7.3%],联合用药组为 506 例[8.5%];HR,1.22[95%CI,1.11-1.35];<0.0001,RR,1.17,危害人数,82)。
在这项观察性、全国性分析中,阿司匹林与双氯芬酸联合用药与死亡率过高有关。这在一定程度上是由缺血性事件(心肌梗死和卒中)引起的,联合用药患者的这些事件更为常见。因此,阿司匹林治疗患者在二级预防中应谨慎使用双氯芬酸。