Suppr超能文献

英国和威尔士高剂量与佐剂三价流感疫苗的成本效益比较。

Cost-effectiveness of high dose versus adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccines in England and Wales.

机构信息

York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, University of York, York, UK.

Sanofi Pasteur UK & Ireland, Reading, UK.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):1261-1271. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2000780.

Abstract

AIMS

High dose trivalent influenza vaccine (HD TIV) and adjuvant TIV (aTIV) have been developed specifically for adults aged 65 and older (65+) who are at high risk of life-threatening complications. However, there is a scarcity of evidence comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of HD TIV and aTIV. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of HD TIV versus aTIV in the England and Wales 65+ population.

METHODS

A cost-utility analysis was conducted using a decision tree with two influenza related outcomes: Laboratory confirmed cases that could result in GP consultation, and hospitalizations that may result in premature mortality. Due to a lack of comparative evidence, the effectiveness of HD TIV versus aTIV was calculated indirectly, based on relative effectiveness estimates for each vaccine versus a common comparator, standard dose (SD) TIV. The primary analysis included hospitalizations explicitly due to influenza/pneumonia. Cost-effectiveness was established for three scenarios applying differing relative effectiveness estimates for aTIV versus SD TIV. Uncertainty was analysed in one-way deterministic sensitivity analyses. A secondary analysis included hospitalizations due to any respiratory illness.

RESULTS

The minimum population impact of vaccination with HD TIV rather than aTIV was 13,092 fewer influenza cases, 1,109 fewer influenza related deaths, 4,673 fewer hospitalizations, and 3,245 fewer GP appointments. HD TIV was cost-effective versus aTIV for all three effectiveness scenarios, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) equal to £1,932, £4,181, and £8,767 per quality adjusted life year. Results were consistent across the secondary analysis and deterministic sensitivity analyses.

LIMITATIONS

The analysis was limited by a lack of robust and consistent effectiveness data for aTIV.

CONCLUSION

HD TIV is cost-effective versus aTIV in people aged 65+ in England and Wales. Use of HD TIV over aTIV could increase clinical benefits and reduce the public health and economic burden of influenza.

摘要

目的

高剂量三价流感疫苗(HD TIV)和佐剂 TIV(aTIV)专为 65 岁及以上(65+)的高危人群研发,这些人群有发生危及生命的并发症的风险。然而,目前尚缺乏比较 HD TIV 和 aTIV 的临床和成本效益的证据。本研究旨在确定在英格兰和威尔士的 65+人群中,HD TIV 相对于 aTIV 的成本效益。

方法

使用决策树进行成本效益分析,该决策树有两个与流感相关的结果:可能导致全科医生就诊的实验室确诊病例和可能导致过早死亡的住院治疗。由于缺乏比较证据,HD TIV 相对于 aTIV 的有效性是间接计算的,即基于每种疫苗相对于标准剂量(SD)TIV 的相对有效性估计值。主要分析包括明确因流感/肺炎而住院的情况。对于 aTIV 相对于 SD TIV 的相对有效性估计值应用三种不同的情况下,分析了成本效益。在单因素确定性敏感性分析中对不确定性进行了分析。二次分析包括因任何呼吸道疾病而住院的情况。

结果

接种 HD TIV 而不是 aTIV 的最低人群影响是减少 13092 例流感病例,减少 1109 例流感相关死亡,减少 4673 例住院治疗和减少 3245 次全科医生就诊。在所有三种有效性情景下,HD TIV 相对于 aTIV 均具有成本效益,增量成本效益比(ICER)分别为每质量调整生命年 1932 英镑、4181 英镑和 8767 英镑。在二次分析和确定性敏感性分析中,结果一致。

局限性

分析受到 aTIV 缺乏稳健和一致的有效性数据的限制。

结论

在英格兰和威尔士的 65+人群中,HD TIV 相对于 aTIV 具有成本效益。与 aTIV 相比,使用 HD TIV 可能会增加临床获益,并减轻流感对公共卫生和经济的负担。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验