Raina MacIntyre C, Kevin Yin J, Felter Christian, Menzies Robert I, Thommes Edward, Largeron Nathalie, Moa Aye M, Trent Mallory, Costantino Valentina, Choi Seulki, Alvarez Fabián P
Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Medical Department, Greater China, Sanofi Vaccines, Beijing, China.
Vaccine X. 2023 Aug 4;15:100365. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100365. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Standard dose influenza vaccine provides moderate protection from infection, but with lower effectiveness among the elderly. High dose and adjuvanted vaccines (HD-TIV and aTIV) were developed to address this. This study aims to estimate the incremental health and economic impact of using HD-TIV (high dose trivalent vaccine) instead of aTIV (adjuvanted trivalent vaccine) on respiratory and circulatory plus respiratory hospitalizations of older people (≥65 years) in Australia.
This is a modelling study comparing predicted hospitalization outcomes in people receiving HD-TIV or aTIV during an average influenza season in Australia. Hospitalization records of Australian adults ≥65 years of age from 01 April to 30 November during 15 influenza seasons (2002-2017 excluding 2009, which was a pandemic) were extracted from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW] and used to calculate hospitalisation rates during an average season. Relative vaccine effectiveness data for aTIV and HD-TIV were used to estimate morbidity burden related to influenza.
Between 2002 and 2017, the average respiratory hospitalization rate among older people during influenza season (April-November) was 3,445/100,000 population-seasons, with an average cost of AU$ 7,175 per admission. The average circulatory plus respiratory hospitalization rate among older Australian people during that time was 10,393/100,000 population-seasons, with an average cost of AU$ 7829 per admission. For older Australians, HD-TIV may avert an additional 6,315-9,410 respiratory admissions each year, with an incremental healthcare cost saving of AU$ 15.9-38.2 million per year compared to aTIV. Similar results were also noted for circulatory plus respiratory hospitalizations.
From the modelled estimations, HD-TIV was associated with less economic burden and fewer respiratory, and circulatory plus respiratory hospitalizations than aTIV for older Australians.
标准剂量流感疫苗对感染有一定的保护作用,但在老年人中的有效性较低。为此研发了高剂量和佐剂疫苗(HD-TIV和aTIV)。本研究旨在评估在澳大利亚使用HD-TIV(高剂量三价疫苗)而非aTIV(佐剂三价疫苗)对65岁及以上老年人呼吸和循环系统加呼吸系统住院的增量健康和经济影响。
这是一项建模研究,比较澳大利亚流感季节期间接受HD-TIV或aTIV人群的预测住院结果。从澳大利亚卫生与福利研究所(AIHW)提取了15个流感季节(2002 - 2017年,不包括2009年大流行年份)4月1日至11月30日期间65岁及以上澳大利亚成年人的住院记录,并用于计算平均季节的住院率。使用aTIV和HD-TIV的相对疫苗有效性数据来估计与流感相关的发病负担。
2002年至2017年期间,流感季节(4月至11月)老年人的平均呼吸住院率为每100,000人口季节3,445例,每次住院平均费用为7,175澳元。在此期间,澳大利亚老年人群循环系统加呼吸系统的平均住院率为每100,000人口季节10,393例,每次住院平均费用为7,829澳元。对于澳大利亚老年人,与aTIV相比,HD-TIV每年可能避免额外6,315 - 9,410例呼吸住院,每年可额外节省医疗费用1,590万至3,820万澳元。循环系统加呼吸系统住院也有类似结果。
根据模型估计,对于澳大利亚老年人,与aTIV相比,HD-TIV的经济负担更小,呼吸、循环系统加呼吸系统住院更少。