• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常人格特质与精神病理学的动态过程有关联吗?

Do normal personality traits connect to the dynamic processes of psychopathology?

作者信息

Miskewicz Kelly, Furr R Michael, Fleeson William

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2022 Sep;13(5):423-437. doi: 10.1037/per0000516. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1037/per0000516
PMID:34726447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10857754/
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to reveal whether traits can predict the core processes constituting borderline personality disorder (BPD). A large sample, including many with BPD, completed personality questionnaires and reported trigger and symptom experiences 5 times per day for 2 weeks. Multilevel modeling revealed first that symptoms were strongly contingent upon concurrent triggers and that BPD's association to symptoms was largely due to this contingency. Second, personality traits predicted all components of this process: trigger experiences, symptom intensity, and the contingency of the symptoms on triggers. However, normal personality traits only partially accounted for the heightened experience of triggers, elevated symptoms, and magnified reactivity to triggers among those with BPD. Thus, normal personality traits are capable of explaining the dynamic processes characteristic of clinical disorders, meaning that normal traits can elucidate even complex dynamic clinical processes. However, traits appear to only partially contain the active ingredients responsible for the core process in BPD. Aspects of the disorder other than traits may account for the heightened trigger experience, elevated symptom intensity, and magnified reactivity to triggers in those with BPD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本文的目的是揭示特质是否能够预测构成边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的核心过程。一个包含许多BPD患者的大样本完成了人格问卷,并在两周内每天报告5次触发因素和症状体验。多层次模型首先揭示,症状强烈依赖于同时出现的触发因素,并且BPD与症状的关联很大程度上归因于这种依赖性。其次,人格特质预测了这一过程的所有组成部分:触发因素体验、症状强度以及症状对触发因素的依赖性。然而,正常人格特质仅部分解释了BPD患者中触发因素体验的增强、症状的加重以及对触发因素反应性的放大。因此,正常人格特质能够解释临床障碍的动态过程特征,这意味着正常特质甚至可以阐明复杂的动态临床过程。然而,特质似乎仅部分包含了导致BPD核心过程的有效成分。除特质之外的障碍方面可能解释了BPD患者中触发因素体验的增强、症状强度的增加以及对触发因素反应性的放大。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Do normal personality traits connect to the dynamic processes of psychopathology?正常人格特质与精神病理学的动态过程有关联吗?
Personal Disord. 2022 Sep;13(5):423-437. doi: 10.1037/per0000516. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Where are the active ingredients for borderline personality disorder? The importance of heightened triggers, two arguments for traits, and two arguments for Criterion A.边缘型人格障碍的活性成分在哪里?高度触发因素的重要性、特质的两个论据以及标准 A 的两个论据。
Personal Disord. 2022 Sep;13(5):447-450. doi: 10.1037/per0000564.
3
Mutualistic processes in the development of psychopathology: The special case of borderline personality disorder.精神病理学发展中的互惠过程:边缘型人格障碍的特殊情况。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2023 Feb;132(2):185-197. doi: 10.1037/abn0000800.
4
What are we missing in dimensional models that might explain core dynamic processes in borderline personality disorder? Commentary on Miskewicz et al. (2022).在维度模型中,我们可能遗漏了哪些可能解释边缘型人格障碍核心动态过程的因素?对 Miskewicz 等人(2022)的评论。
Personal Disord. 2022 Sep;13(5):445-446. doi: 10.1037/per0000529.
5
A Contingency-Oriented Approach to Understanding Borderline Personality Disorder: Situational Triggers and Symptoms.一种基于权变的方法来理解边缘型人格障碍:情境触发因素和症状
J Pers Disord. 2015 Aug;29(4):486-502. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.486.
6
Familial factors and the risk of borderline personality pathology: genetic and environmental transmission.家族因素与边缘型人格病理风险:遗传和环境传递。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jun;50(8):1327-1337. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719001260. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
Personality lives in the intersubjective space between people: Comment on Miskewicz et al. (2022).人格存在于人与人之间的主体间空间中:对 Miskewicz 等人(2022)的评论。
Personal Disord. 2022 Sep;13(5):442-444. doi: 10.1037/per0000533.
8
Symptoms of borderline personality and related pathologies behave as temporal and contemporaneous networks.边缘型人格及相关病态的症状表现为具有时间性和同时性的网络。
Personal Disord. 2023 Jul;14(4):467-477. doi: 10.1037/per0000618. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
9
General psychopathology factor and borderline personality disorder: Evidence for substantial overlap from two nationally representative surveys of U.S. adults.一般精神病理学因素与边缘型人格障碍:来自两项美国成年人全国代表性调查的大量重叠证据。
Personal Disord. 2021 Jan;12(1):86-92. doi: 10.1037/per0000405. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
10
Competing Theories of Borderline Personality Disorder.边缘型人格障碍的竞争理论。
J Pers Disord. 2018 Apr;32(2):148-167. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2018.32.2.148.

本文引用的文献

1
Global personality dysfunction and the relationship of pathological and normal trait domains in the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders.全球人格功能障碍以及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格障碍替代模型中病理性和正常特质领域的关系。
J Pers. 2022 Feb;90(1):34-46. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12560. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies.精神病理学的分层分类法(HiTOP):传统分类法的维度替代方案。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 May;126(4):454-477. doi: 10.1037/abn0000258. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
3
Advancing the Assessment of Dynamic Psychological Processes.
推进动态心理过程的评估
Assessment. 2016 Aug;23(4):399-403. doi: 10.1177/1073191116654760.
4
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory.HEXACO人格量表的心理测量特性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Apr 1;39(2):329-58. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.
5
Daily Interpersonal and Affective Dynamics in Personality Disorder.人格障碍中的日常人际与情感动态
J Pers Disord. 2015 Aug;29(4):503-25. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.503.
6
A Contingency-Oriented Approach to Understanding Borderline Personality Disorder: Situational Triggers and Symptoms.一种基于权变的方法来理解边缘型人格障碍:情境触发因素和症状
J Pers Disord. 2015 Aug;29(4):486-502. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.486.
7
Whole Trait Theory.整体特质理论
J Res Pers. 2015 Jun 1;56:82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009.
8
Does assessing suicidality frequently and repeatedly cause harm? A randomized control study.频繁且反复评估自杀倾向会造成伤害吗?一项随机对照研究。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1171-81. doi: 10.1037/pas0000118. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
9
DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中替代人格障碍模型特质作为五因素模型的适应不良极端变体:一项项目反应理论分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):343-54. doi: 10.1037/abn0000035. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
10
Associations between changes in normal personality traits and borderline personality disorder symptoms over 16 years.16年间正常人格特质变化与边缘型人格障碍症状之间的关联。
Personal Disord. 2015 Jan;6(1):1-11. doi: 10.1037/per0000092. Epub 2014 Nov 3.