Suppr超能文献

老年人糖尿病严重低血糖后磺脲类药物和胰岛素治疗的减量化。

Deintensification of Treatment With Sulfonylurea and Insulin After Severe Hypoglycemia Among Older Adults With Diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Durham Veterans Affairs Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2132215. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32215.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Practice guidelines recommend deintensification of hypoglycemic agents among older adults with diabetes who are at high risk of hypoglycemia, yet real-world treatment deintensification practices are not well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the incidence of sulfonylurea and insulin deintensification after a hypoglycemia-associated emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization among older adults with diabetes and to identify factors associated with deintensification of treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included a random sample of 20% of nationwide fee-for-service US Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with concurrent Medicare parts A, B, and D coverage between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017. Individuals with diabetes who had at least 1 hypoglycemia-associated ED visit or hospitalization were included. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2020, to August 1, 2021.

EXPOSURES

Baseline medication for the treatment of diabetes (sulfonylurea, insulin, or both).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Incidence of treatment deintensification (yes or no) in the 100 days after a severe hypoglycemic episode requiring an ED visit or hospitalization, with treatment deintensification defined as (1) a decrease in sulfonylurea dose, (2) a change from long-acting to short-acting sulfonylurea (glipizide), (3) discontinuation of sulfonylurea, or (4) discontinuation of insulin based on pharmacy dispensing claims.

RESULTS

Among 76 278 distinct Medicare beneficiaries who had a hypoglycemia-associated ED visit or hospitalization, the mean (SD) age was 76.6 (7.6) years. Of 106 293 total hypoglycemic episodes requiring hospital attention, 69 084 (65.0%) occurred among women, 26 056 (24.5%) among Black individuals; 4761 (4.5%) among Hispanic individuals; 69 704 (65.6%) among White individuals; and 5772 (5.4%) among individuals of other races and ethnicities (comprising Asian, North American Native, unknown race or ethnicity, and unspecified race or ethnicity). A total of 32 074 episodes (30.2%) occurred among those receiving sulfonylurea only, 60 350 (56.8%) occurred among those receiving insulin only, and 13 869 (13.0%) occurred among those receiving both sulfonylurea and insulin. Treatment deintensification rates were highest among individuals receiving both sulfonylurea and insulin therapies at the time of their hypoglycemic episode (6677 episodes [48.1%]), followed by individuals receiving sulfonylurea only (14 192 episodes [44.2%]) and insulin only (14 495 episodes [24.0%]). Treatment deintensification rates increased between 2007 and 2017 (sulfonylurea only: from 41.4% to 49.7%; P < .001 for trend; insulin only: from 21.3% to 25.9%; P < .001 for trend; sulfonylurea and insulin: from 45.9% to 49.6%; P = .005 for trend). Lower socioeconomic status (as indicated by the receipt of low-income subsidies) was associated with lower odds of deintensification, regardless of baseline hypoglycemic regimen (sulfonylurea only: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.70-0.78]; insulin only: AOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.68-0.75]; sulfonylurea and insulin: AOR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.66-0.78]). A number of patient factors were associated with higher odds of treatment deintensification: higher frailty (eg, ≥40% probability of needing assistance with activities of daily living among those receiving sulfonylurea and insulin: AOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.32-1.71), chronic kidney disease (eg, sulfonylurea and insulin: AOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19-1.40), a history of falls (eg, sulfonylurea and insulin: AOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09-1.33), and depression (eg, sulfonylurea and insulin: AOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.20).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, deintensification of sulfonylurea and/or insulin therapy within 100 days after a hypoglycemia-associated ED visit or hospitalization occurred in fewer than 50% of older adults with diabetes; however, these deintensification rates may be increasing over time, and deintensification of insulin was likely underestimated because of challenges in capturing changes to insulin dosing using administrative claims data. These results suggest that greater efforts are needed to identify individuals at high risk of hypoglycemia to encourage appropriate treatment deintensification in accordance with current evidence.

摘要

重要性:对于有发生低血糖风险的老年糖尿病患者,指南建议减少降糖药物的使用,但目前还没有很好地描述现实世界中降糖药物的治疗调整情况。

目的:本研究旨在调查低血糖相关急诊科(ED)就诊或住院的老年糖尿病患者中磺酰脲类药物和胰岛素的减药情况,并确定与治疗调整相关的因素。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间,全美按服务收费的 Medicare 受益人群中随机抽取的 20%年龄在 65 岁及以上、同时具有 Medicare 部分 A、B 和 D 覆盖的患者。纳入至少有一次低血糖相关 ED 就诊或住院且正在使用降糖药物治疗糖尿病的患者。数据分析时间为 2020 年 8 月 1 日至 2021 年 8 月 1 日。

暴露:基线时用于治疗糖尿病的药物(磺酰脲类药物、胰岛素或两者兼有)。

主要结局和测量指标:在严重低血糖事件导致 ED 就诊或住院后 100 天内,治疗调整(是或否)的发生率,治疗调整定义为:(1)磺酰脲类药物剂量减少;(2)由长效磺酰脲类药物(格列吡嗪)改为短效磺酰脲类药物;(3)停用磺酰脲类药物;(4)基于药房配药记录,停用胰岛素。

结果:在 76278 名有低血糖相关 ED 就诊或住院的 Medicare 受益人群中,平均(SD)年龄为 76.6(7.6)岁。在总共需要住院治疗的 106293 次低血糖事件中,69084 次(65.0%)发生在女性患者中,26056 次(24.5%)发生在黑人患者中,4761 次(4.5%)发生在西班牙裔患者中,69704 次(65.6%)发生在白人患者中,5772 次(5.4%)发生在其他种族和族裔(包括亚洲人、北美原住民、未知种族或族裔和未指定种族或族裔)患者中。在接受磺酰脲类药物治疗的患者中,有 32074 次(30.2%)事件发生,在接受胰岛素治疗的患者中,有 60350 次(56.8%)事件发生,在同时接受磺酰脲类药物和胰岛素治疗的患者中,有 13869 次(13.0%)事件发生。同时接受磺酰脲类药物和胰岛素治疗的患者治疗调整率最高(6677 次[48.1%]),其次是仅接受磺酰脲类药物治疗的患者(14192 次[44.2%])和仅接受胰岛素治疗的患者(14495 次[24.0%])。2007 年至 2017 年期间,治疗调整率呈上升趋势(仅接受磺酰脲类药物治疗的患者:从 41.4%上升至 49.7%;P<0.001;仅接受胰岛素治疗的患者:从 21.3%上升至 25.9%;P<0.001;同时接受磺酰脲类药物和胰岛素治疗的患者:从 45.9%上升至 49.6%;P=0.005)。较低的社会经济地位(由接受低收入补贴来表示)与降低治疗调整的可能性相关,而与基线低血糖治疗方案无关(仅接受磺酰脲类药物治疗的患者:调整后比值比[OR],0.74[95%CI,0.70-0.78];仅接受胰岛素治疗的患者:调整后 OR,0.71[95%CI,0.68-0.75];同时接受磺酰脲类药物和胰岛素治疗的患者:调整后 OR,0.72[95%CI,0.66-0.78])。一些患者因素与治疗调整的可能性增加有关:更高的脆弱性(例如,在接受磺酰脲类药物和胰岛素治疗的患者中,有 40%以上的人可能需要协助日常生活活动:调整后 OR,1.50[95%CI,1.32-1.71])、慢性肾脏病(例如,同时接受磺酰脲类药物和胰岛素治疗:调整后 OR,1.29[95%CI,1.19-1.40])、跌倒史(例如,同时接受磺酰脲类药物和胰岛素治疗:调整后 OR,1.20[95%CI,1.09-1.33])和抑郁症(例如,同时接受磺酰脲类药物和胰岛素治疗:调整后 OR,1.11[95%CI,1.02-1.20])。

结论和意义:在这项队列研究中,低血糖相关 ED 就诊或住院后 100 天内,有不足 50%的老年糖尿病患者减少了磺酰脲类药物和/或胰岛素的治疗,但是这些治疗调整率可能随着时间的推移而增加,而且由于使用行政索赔数据难以捕捉到胰岛素剂量的变化,因此胰岛素的调整可能被低估了。这些结果表明,需要进一步努力确定低血糖风险较高的患者,以鼓励根据现有证据进行适当的治疗调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86cb/8564578/7f51fdcaa54c/jamanetwopen-e2132215-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验