• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型二线降糖药物在 2 型糖尿病老年患者中的严重低血糖风险:按低血糖风险已知指标分层。

Risk of Severe Hypoglycemia With Newer Second-line Glucose-lowering Medications in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Stratified by Known Indicators of Hypoglycemia Risk.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Dec 1;78(12):2426-2434. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad075.

DOI:10.1093/gerona/glad075
PMID:36866496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10692415/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe hypoglycemia is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. We evaluated the risk of severe hypoglycemia in older adults initiating newer glucose-lowering medications overall and across strata of known indicators of high hypoglycemia risk.

METHODS

We conducted a comparative-effectiveness cohort study of older adults aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes initiating sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) or SGLT2i versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) using Medicare claims (3/2013-12/2018) and Medicare-linked-electronic health records. We identified severe hypoglycemia requiring emergency or inpatient visits using validated algorithms. After 1:1 propensity score matching, we estimated hazard ratios (HR) and rate differences (RD) per 1,000 person-years. Analyses were stratified by baseline insulin, sulfonylurea, cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and frailty.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 7 (interquartile range: 4-16) months, SGLT2i was associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycemia versus DPP-4i (HR 0.75 [0.68, 0.83]; RD -3.21 [-4.29, -2.12]), and versus GLP-1RA (HR 0.90 [0.82, 0.98]; RD -1.33 [-2.44, -0.23]). RD for SGLT2i versus DPP-4i was larger in patients using baseline insulin than in those not, although HRs were similar. In patients using baseline sulfonylurea, the risk of hypoglycemia was lower in SGLT2i versus DPP-4i (HR 0.57 [0.49, 0.65], RD -6.80 [-8.43, -5.16]), while the association was near-null in those without baseline sulfonylurea. Results stratified by baseline CVD, CKD and frailty were similar to the overall cohort findings. Findings for the GLP-1RA comparison were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2i was associated with a lower hypoglycemia risk versus incretin-based medications, with larger associations in patients using baseline insulin or sulfonylurea.

摘要

背景

严重低血糖与不良临床结局相关。我们评估了新的降糖药物在总体和已知低血糖高风险指标分层中对老年患者发生严重低血糖的风险。

方法

我们使用医疗保险索赔数据(2013 年 3 月至 2018 年 12 月)和医疗保险相关电子健康记录,对年龄>65 岁、患有 2 型糖尿病且开始使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)的患者进行了一项比较有效性队列研究,比较了 SGLT2i 与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂(DPP-4i)或 SGLT2i 与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)的效果。我们使用验证后的算法确定需要急诊或住院治疗的严重低血糖事件。经过 1:1 倾向评分匹配后,我们估计了每 1000 人年的危险比(HR)和率差异(RD)。分析按照基线时是否使用胰岛素、磺酰脲类药物、心血管疾病(CVD)、慢性肾脏病(CKD)和虚弱情况进行分层。

结果

在中位随访 7 个月(四分位间距:4-16 个月)期间,与 DPP-4i 相比,SGLT2i 降低低血糖风险(HR 0.75 [0.68, 0.83]; RD -3.21 [-4.29, -2.12]),与 GLP-1RA 相比(HR 0.90 [0.82, 0.98]; RD -1.33 [-2.44, -0.23])。与基线时使用胰岛素的患者相比,SGLT2i 与 DPP-4i 相比 RD 更大,而 HR 相似。在基线时使用磺酰脲类药物的患者中,SGLT2i 与 DPP-4i 相比低血糖风险更低(HR 0.57 [0.49, 0.65], RD -6.80 [-8.43, -5.16]),而在基线时未使用磺酰脲类药物的患者中,二者关联接近零。按基线 CVD、CKD 和虚弱情况分层的结果与总体队列的发现相似。GLP-1RA 比较的结果也相似。

结论

与基于肠促胰岛素的药物相比,SGLT2i 与低血糖风险降低相关,在基线时使用胰岛素或磺酰脲类药物的患者中,相关性更大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edea/10692415/5fbb598f6416/glad075_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edea/10692415/5fbb598f6416/glad075_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edea/10692415/5fbb598f6416/glad075_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk of Severe Hypoglycemia With Newer Second-line Glucose-lowering Medications in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Stratified by Known Indicators of Hypoglycemia Risk.新型二线降糖药物在 2 型糖尿病老年患者中的严重低血糖风险:按低血糖风险已知指标分层。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Dec 1;78(12):2426-2434. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad075.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors, and Sulfonylureas for Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy.胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂、钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂、二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂和磺脲类药物治疗威胁视力的糖尿病视网膜病变的疗效比较。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2024 Oct;8(10):943-952. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 May 11.
3
A population-based cohort defined risk of hyperkalemia after initiating SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP1 receptor agonists or DPP-4 inhibitors to patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.一项基于人群的队列研究确定了慢性肾脏病合并2型糖尿病患者开始使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT-2)抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽1(GLP1)受体激动剂或二肽基肽酶4(DPP-4)抑制剂后发生高钾血症的风险。
Kidney Int. 2024 Mar;105(3):618-628. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.11.025. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
4
Comparison of Diabetes Medications Used by Adults With Commercial Insurance vs Medicare Advantage, 2016 to 2019.2016 年至 2019 年商业保险与医疗保险优势计划中成年人使用的糖尿病药物比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2035792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35792.
5
Health care utilization and costs associated with switching from DPP-4i to GLP-1RA or SGLT2i: an observational cohort study.从 DPP-4i 切换到 GLP-1RA 或 SGLT2i 相关的医疗保健利用和成本:一项观察性队列研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Apr;27(4):435-443. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.4.435.
6
Comparative cardiovascular safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus other glucose-lowering agents in real-world patients with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide population-based cohort study.在真实世界的 2 型糖尿病患者中,GLP-1 受体激动剂与其他降糖药物的心血管安全性比较:一项全国范围内基于人群的队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Jun 13;19(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01053-0.
7
Comparing Effectiveness and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors vs DPP-4 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Varying Baseline HbA1c Levels.比较 SGLT2 抑制剂与 DPP-4 抑制剂在基线 HbA1c 水平不同的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Mar 1;183(3):242-254. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6664.
8
Comorbidities and neighborhood factors associated with prescription of sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists among medically underserved populations.医疗服务不足人群中与钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂处方相关的合并症和邻里因素。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Jun;29(6):699-711. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.6.699.
9
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Nephrolithiasis Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与 2 型糖尿病患者肾结石风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Mar 1;184(3):265-274. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7660.
10
SGLT2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.SGLT2 抑制剂与老年 2 型糖尿病患者急性肾损伤风险。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 Jun;79(6):858-867.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.09.015. Epub 2021 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors vs glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂在老年2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 26;16:1486655. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1486655. eCollection 2025.
2
Frailty indices based on routinely collected data: a scoping review.基于常规收集数据的衰弱指数:一项范围综述
J Frailty Aging. 2025 Jun;14(3):100047. doi: 10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100047. Epub 2025 May 3.
3
Unleashing frailty from laboratory into real world: A critical step toward frailty-guided clinical care of older adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Reproducibility of real-world evidence studies using clinical practice data to inform regulatory and coverage decisions.利用临床实践数据进行真实世界证据研究的可重复性,以支持监管和覆盖决策。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 31;13(1):5126. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32310-3.
2
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法:《2022 年糖尿病医学诊疗标准》。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S125-S143. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S009.
3
Validation of obesity-related diagnosis codes in claims data.
从实验室到现实世界释放脆弱性:迈向老年衰弱患者临床护理的关键一步。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Nov;72(11):3299-3314. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19151. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
4
Assessing the Benefits and Harms of Pharmacotherapy in Older Adults with Frailty: Insights from Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies of Routine Health Care Data.评估衰弱老年人药物治疗的获益和危害:来自常规医疗保健数据的药物流行病学研究的启示。
Drugs Aging. 2024 Jul;41(7):583-600. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01121-0. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
5
Comparative safety and cardiovascular effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in nursing homes.养老院中钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂的比较安全性和心血管效果。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Aug;26(8):3403-3417. doi: 10.1111/dom.15682. Epub 2024 May 23.
6
Safety of sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.2型糖尿病患者中钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT-2)抑制剂的安全性:队列研究的荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 13;14:1275060. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1275060. eCollection 2023.
验证索赔数据中与肥胖相关的诊断代码。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Dec;23(12):2623-2631. doi: 10.1111/dom.14512. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
4
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与 2 型糖尿病成人糖尿病酮症酸中毒风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Diabetes. 2022 Feb;46(1):10-15.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
5
Effect of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors Used in Combination with Insulin Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.二肽基肽酶4抑制剂与胰岛素联合治疗2型糖尿病患者的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Oct;11(10):2371-2382. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00914-x. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
6
Association between reduced kidney function and incident hypoglycaemia in people with diabetes: The Stockholm Creatinine Measurements (SCREAM) project.肾功能下降与糖尿病患者低血糖事件的相关性:斯德哥尔摩肌酐测量(SCREAM)项目。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Aug;22(8):1425-1435. doi: 10.1111/dom.14051. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
7
How Significant Is Severe Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Diabetes?严重低血糖在老年糖尿病患者中有多重要?
Diabetes Care. 2020 Mar;43(3):512-514. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0069.
8
Paradox of glycemic management: multimorbidity, glycemic control, and high-risk medication use among adults with diabetes.血糖管理的悖论:患有糖尿病的成年人的多种合并症、血糖控制和高风险药物使用。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001007.
9
Measuring Frailty in Administrative Claims Data: Comparative Performance of Four Claims-Based Frailty Measures in the U.S. Medicare Data.在行政索赔数据中测量虚弱程度:美国医疗保险数据中四种基于索赔的虚弱程度衡量标准的比较性能。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 May 22;75(6):1120-1125. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz224.
10
Revalidation of the Hypoglycemia Risk Stratification Tool Using ICD-10 Codes.使用国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)编码对低血糖风险分层工具进行重新验证
Diabetes Care. 2019 Apr;42(4):e58-e59. doi: 10.2337/dc18-2154. Epub 2019 Feb 14.