• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中世纪细胞学说:1490 年至 1630 年间印刷书籍中的基础、发展、演变和图形表示。

The medieval cell doctrine: Foundations, development, evolution, and graphic representations in printed books from 1490 to 1630.

机构信息

Institute of Social Science, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

J Hist Neurosci. 2022 Apr-Jun;31(2-3):115-175. doi: 10.1080/0964704X.2021.1972702. Epub 2021 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1080/0964704X.2021.1972702
PMID:34727005
Abstract

The medieval cell doctrine was a series of related psychological models based on ancient Greco-Roman ideas in which cognitive faculties were assigned to "cells," typically corresponding to the cerebral ventricles. During Late Antiquity and continuing during the Early Middle Ages, Christian philosophers attempted to reinterpret Aristotle's , along with later modifications by Herophilos and Galen, in a manner consistent with religious doctrine. The resulting medieval cell doctrine was formulated by the fathers of the early Christian Church in the fourth and fifth centuries. Printed images of the doctrine that appeared in medical, philosophical, and religious works, beginning with "graphic incunabula" at the end of the fifteenth century, extended and evolved a manuscript tradition that had been in place since at least the eleventh century. Some of these early psychological models just pigeonholed the various cognitive faculties in different non-overlapping bins within the brain (albeit without any clinicopathologic evidence supporting such localizations), while others specifically promoted or implied a linear sequence of events, resembling the process of digestion. By the sixteenth century, printed images of the doctrine were usually linear three-cell versions with few exceptions having four or five cells. Despite direct challenges by Massa and Vesalius in the sixteenth century, and Willis in the seventeenth century, the doctrine saw its most elaborate formulations in the late-sixteenth and early-seventeenth centuries with illustrations by the Paracelsan physicians Bacci and Fludd. Overthrow of the doctrine had to await abandonment of Galenic cardiovascular physiology from the late-seventeenth to early-eighteenth centuries.

摘要

中世纪的细胞学说(The medieval cell doctrine)是一系列基于古希腊罗马思想的相关心理模型,其中认知官能被分配到“细胞”中,通常对应于脑室。在晚期古代和早期中世纪期间,基督教哲学家试图以与宗教教义一致的方式重新解释亚里士多德的思想,以及后来由赫罗菲洛斯和盖伦的修改。由此产生的中世纪细胞学说由早期基督教教会的教父在四世纪和五世纪制定。从 15 世纪末的“图形古版书”开始,出现在医学、哲学和宗教作品中的该学说的印刷图像扩展和发展了一种自 11 世纪以来就存在的手稿传统。其中一些早期的心理模型只是将各种认知官能归入大脑中不同的非重叠容器中(尽管没有任何临床病理学证据支持这种定位),而其他模型则特别提倡或暗示了一个线性的事件序列,类似于消化过程。到 16 世纪,该学说的印刷图像通常是线性的三细胞版本,只有少数例外有四个或五个细胞。尽管在 16 世纪有马萨和维萨里以及 17 世纪的威利斯直接提出挑战,但在 16 世纪后期和 17 世纪早期,该学说在帕拉塞尔苏斯医生巴奇和弗拉德的插图中得到了最详尽的阐述。直到 17 世纪后期到 18 世纪早期,随着盖伦心血管生理学的放弃,该学说才被推翻。

相似文献

1
The medieval cell doctrine: Foundations, development, evolution, and graphic representations in printed books from 1490 to 1630.中世纪细胞学说:1490 年至 1630 年间印刷书籍中的基础、发展、演变和图形表示。
J Hist Neurosci. 2022 Apr-Jun;31(2-3):115-175. doi: 10.1080/0964704X.2021.1972702. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
2
The influence of the final cause doctrine on anatomists of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries concerning selected anatomical structures of the head and neck.最终因学说对 16 至 17 世纪头颈部某些解剖结构的解剖学家的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122 Suppl 3:S35-51. doi: 10.1002/lary.23391. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
3
Evolution of illustrations in anatomy: a study from the classical period in Europe to modern times.解剖学插图的演变:从欧洲古典时期到现代的研究
Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):175-88. doi: 10.1002/ase.1479. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
4
Evolution of the myth of the human traced through text and illustrations in printed books: The case of Vesalius and his plagiarists.通过印刷书籍中的文字和插图追溯人类神话的演变:以维萨里及其剽窃者为例。
J Hist Neurosci. 2022 Apr-Jun;31(2-3):221-261. doi: 10.1080/0964704X.2021.2024406. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
Chapter 33: the history of movement disorders.第33章:运动障碍病史。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2010;95:501-46. doi: 10.1016/S0072-9752(08)02133-7.
6
Care of the dying: an ethical and historical perspective.临终关怀:伦理与历史视角
Crit Care Med. 1992 Oct;20(10):1473-82. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199210000-00018.
7
The misrepresented uterus. The progression of uterine depictions in anatomical atlases between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries.被误绘的子宫。16世纪至18世纪解剖图谱中子宫描绘的演变。
J Biocommun. 1998;25(4):10-3.
8
The history of optic chiasm from antiquity to the twentieth century.从古代到二十世纪的视交叉历史。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Nov;33(11):1889-1898. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3564-1. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
9
Ancient views on the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis: an historical and epistemological perspective.关于下丘脑 - 垂体 - 甲状腺轴的古代观点:历史与认识论视角
Pituitary. 2000 Oct;3(2):83-95. doi: 10.1023/a:1009953723963.
10
The doctrine of signatures: a historical, philosophical and scientific view (I).特征疗法:历史、哲学与科学视角(一)
Br Homeopath J. 1999 Oct;88(4):172-7. doi: 10.1054/homp.1999.0322.