Suppr超能文献

口服司美格鲁肽与度拉鲁肽和利拉鲁肽相比在口服降糖药治疗效果不佳的2型糖尿病患者中的终身成本效益

Lifetime Cost-effectiveness of Oral Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Oral Antidiabetics.

作者信息

Risebrough Nancy A, Baker Timothy M, Zhang Lirong, Ali Sarah N, Radin Michael, Dang-Tan Tam

机构信息

ICON plc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

ICON plc, New York, New York.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2021 Nov;43(11):1812-1826.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Oct 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio of oral semaglutide (14 mg once daily) vs other glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist treatments among adults with type 2 diabetes that was inadequately controlled with 1 to 2 oral antidiabetic drugs from a US payer perspective.

METHODS

A state-transition model with a competing risk approach was developed for diabetic complications and risk of cardiovascular events based on the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 1 equations. Baseline population characteristics reflect the PIONEER 4 trial (Efficacy and Safety of Oral Semaglutide Versus Liraglutide and Versus Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) of oral semaglutide. Model comparators included subcutaneous semaglutide, dulaglutide, and liraglutide. Treatment effects (change in glycosylated hemoglobin, weight, and systolic blood pressure) were estimated by network meta-analysis. Drug, management, and event costs (in 2019 US dollars), survival after nonfatal events, and utilities were obtained from the literature. Costs and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) outcomes were discounted at 3% annually over a lifetime horizon. Probabilistic and 1-way sensitivity analyses were performed.

FINDINGS

Total estimated costs and QALYs were $144,065 and 12.98 for oral semaglutide, $145,721 and 12.96 for dulaglutide, $145,833 and 12.99 for SC semaglutide, and $149,428 and 12.97 for liraglutide, respectively. Oral semaglutide was less costly and more effective than dulaglutide and liraglutide but less costly than subcutaneous semaglutide with similar effectiveness. Oral semaglutide was favored versus subcutaneous semaglutide in 52.10% of model replications at a willingness-to-pay of $150,000 per QALY.

IMPLICATIONS

Oral semaglutide is predicted to offer health benefits similar to subcutaneous semaglutide and ahead of dulaglutide and liraglutide. Oral semaglutide is a cost-effective glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist treatment option.

摘要

目的

从美国医保支付方的角度,评估口服司美格鲁肽(每日一次,14毫克)与其他胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂治疗方案相比,在使用1至2种口服降糖药血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病成年患者中的增量成本-效用比。

方法

基于英国前瞻性糖尿病研究结局模型1的方程,开发了一种具有竞争风险方法的状态转换模型,用于评估糖尿病并发症和心血管事件风险。基线人群特征反映了口服司美格鲁肽的先锋4试验(口服司美格鲁肽与利拉鲁肽及安慰剂治疗2型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性)。模型比较对象包括皮下注射司美格鲁肽、度拉糖肽和利拉鲁肽。通过网络荟萃分析估计治疗效果(糖化血红蛋白、体重和收缩压的变化)。药物、管理和事件成本(以2019年美元计)、非致命事件后的生存率和效用值均来自文献。成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)结局在终身范围内按每年3%进行贴现。进行了概率分析和单因素敏感性分析。

结果

口服司美格鲁肽的估计总成本和QALY分别为144,065美元和12.98,度拉糖肽为145,721美元和12.96,皮下注射司美格鲁肽为145,833美元和12.99,利拉鲁肽为149,428美元和12.97。口服司美格鲁肽比度拉糖肽和利拉鲁肽成本更低且更有效,但在效果相似的情况下比皮下注射司美格鲁肽成本更低。在每QALY支付意愿为150,000美元时,口服司美格鲁肽在52.10%的模型重复中比皮下注射司美格鲁肽更受青睐。

结论

预计口服司美格鲁肽能提供与皮下注射司美格鲁肽相似且优于度拉糖肽和利拉鲁肽的健康效益。口服司美格鲁肽是一种具有成本效益的胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验