Lawson Alyssa P, Mayer Richard E, Adamo-Villani Nicoletta, Benes Bedrich, Lei Xingyu, Cheng Justin
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA.
Computer Science Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.
Educ Technol Res Dev. 2021;69(6):3101-3129. doi: 10.1007/s11423-021-10057-w. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
The positivity principle states that people learn better from instructors who display positive emotions rather than negative emotions. In two experiments, students viewed a short video lecture on a statistics topic in which an instructor stood next to a series of slides as she lectured and then they took either an immediate test (Experiment 1) or a delayed test (Experiment 2). In a between-subjects design, students saw an instructor who used her voice, body movement, gesture, facial expression, and eye gaze to display one of four emotions while lecturing: happy (positive/active), content (positive/passive), frustrated (negative/active), or bored (negative/passive). First, learners were able to recognize the emotional tone of the instructor in an instructional video lecture, particularly by more strongly rating a positive instructor as displaying positive emotions and a negative instructor as displaying negative emotions (in Experiments 1 and 2). Second, concerning building a social connection during learning, learners rated a positive instructor as more likely to facilitate learning, more credible, and more engaging than a negative instructor (in Experiments 1 and 2). Third, concerning cognitive engagement during learning, learners reported paying more attention during learning for a positive instructor than a negative instructor (in Experiments 1 and 2). Finally, concerning learning outcome, learners who had a positive instructor scored higher than learners who had a negative instructor on a delayed posttest (Experiment 2) but not an immediate posttest (Experiment 1). Overall, there is evidence for the positivity principle and the cognitive-affective model of e-learning from which it is derived.
积极性原则表明,人们从表现出积极情绪而非消极情绪的教师那里学习效果更好。在两项实验中,学生观看了一段关于统计学主题的短视频讲座,讲座中一位教师在讲解一系列幻灯片时站在旁边,然后他们要么立即进行测试(实验1),要么延迟进行测试(实验2)。在一项被试间设计中,学生看到一位教师在讲座时通过声音、身体动作、手势、面部表情和眼神来表现四种情绪之一:快乐(积极/活跃)、满足(积极/消极)、沮丧(消极/活跃)或无聊(消极/消极)。首先,学习者能够在教学视频讲座中识别教师的情绪基调,特别是通过更强烈地将积极的教师评为表现出积极情绪,将消极的教师评为表现出消极情绪(在实验1和实验2中)。其次,关于学习过程中建立社会联系,学习者认为积极的教师比消极的教师更有可能促进学习、更可信且更有吸引力(在实验1和实验2中)。第三,关于学习过程中的认知参与,学习者报告说,在学习过程中,积极的教师比消极的教师更能吸引他们的注意力(在实验1和实验2中)。最后,关于学习结果,在延迟后的测试中(实验2),有积极教师的学习者得分高于有消极教师的学习者,但在即时测试中(实验1)并非如此。总体而言,有证据支持积极性原则及其所衍生的电子学习认知-情感模型。