• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辛普森悖论:人口动态、贫困和不平等的人口学案例研究。

Simpson's paradox: a demographic case study of population dynamics, poverty, and inequality.

机构信息

Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Avenida Brasil 4365 Sala 314, Manguinhos. 21041-360 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil.

University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. Illinois Estados Unidos.

出版信息

Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Oct;26(10):4453-4469. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320212610.10902021. Epub 2021 May 22.

DOI:10.1590/1413-812320212610.10902021
PMID:34730635
Abstract

Brazil is undergoing a demographic transition characterized by regional inequalities. It is reasonable to assume that aspects related to poverty, development and inequality might reverse the sign of the association of indicators of demographic transition, exemplifying a phenomenon known as Simpson's Paradox. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of inequality, poverty and social development on population dynamics in Brazil, verifying the occurrence of Simpson's paradox in demographic transition. We used population data from the 1991, 2000 and 2010 national censuses, broken down by age and federative unit (FU). The correlation between demographic indicators was assessed by stratifying the FUs into groups according to their median social indicators. The findings show that all FUs have progressed against social indicators and are undergoing demographic transition; however, despite reductions in disparities over the study period, persistent gaps exist between regions. Simpson's paradox was present when the analysis was carried out by census year and social indicators, and was particularly pronounced in 1991. The main challenge is to define how to analyze demographic dynamics in Brazil and understand how contextual factors alter the pace, quantum, and pattern of demographic transition.

摘要

巴西正在经历人口转型,其特点是地区间存在不平等现象。可以合理地假设,与贫困、发展和不平等相关的方面可能会逆转人口转型指标关联的方向,这例证了一种被称为辛普森悖论的现象。本研究旨在分析不平等、贫困和社会发展对巴西人口动态的影响,以验证人口转型中是否存在辛普森悖论。我们使用了 1991 年、2000 年和 2010 年全国人口普查按年龄和联邦单位(FU)划分的数据。根据社会指标中位数将 FU 分层为不同组,以评估人口指标之间的相关性。研究结果表明,所有 FU 都在朝着社会指标的方向发展,并正在经历人口转型;然而,尽管在研究期间差异有所减少,但各地区之间仍存在持续的差距。当按普查年份和社会指标进行分析时,辛普森悖论存在,尤其是在 1991 年更为明显。主要的挑战是如何定义如何分析巴西的人口动态,并了解背景因素如何改变人口转型的速度、数量和模式。

相似文献

1
Simpson's paradox: a demographic case study of population dynamics, poverty, and inequality.辛普森悖论:人口动态、贫困和不平等的人口学案例研究。
Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Oct;26(10):4453-4469. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320212610.10902021. Epub 2021 May 22.
2
Simpson's Paradox is suppression, but Lord's Paradox is neither: clarification of and correction to Tu, Gunnell, and Gilthorpe (2008).辛普森悖论属于抑制现象,但洛德悖论并非如此:对图、冈内尔和吉尔索普(2008年)的澄清与修正
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2019 Nov 27;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12982-019-0087-0. eCollection 2019.
3
Population growth, inequality and poverty.人口增长、不平等与贫困。
Int Labour Rev. 1983 Jul-Aug;122(4):443-60.
4
Misleading Epidemiological and Statistical Evidence in the Presence of Simpson's Paradox: An Illustrative Study Using Simulated Scenarios of Observational Study Designs.辛普森悖论存在时的误导性流行病学和统计证据:一项使用观察性研究设计模拟场景的说明性研究
J Med Life. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):37-44. doi: 10.25122/jml-2019-0120.
5
Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide.心理学中的辛普森悖论:实用指南。
Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 12;4:513. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513. eCollection 2013.
6
Disparity in child welfare referrals from public schools: An example of Simpson's Paradox?公立学校转介儿童福利的差异:辛普森悖论的一个例子?
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Apr;102:104397. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104397. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
7
Response to: Simpson's Paradox is suppression, but Lord's Paradox is neither: clarification of and correction to Tu, Gunnell, and Gilthorpe (2008) by Nickerson CA & Brown NJL (https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-2).回应:辛普森悖论是抑制现象,但洛德悖论并非如此:对尼克森CA和布朗NJL对涂、冈内尔和吉尔索普(2008年)的澄清与修正(https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-2) 。
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 11;17:1. doi: 10.1186/s12982-020-00089-7. eCollection 2020.
8
Inequalities in healthy life expectancy by Brazilian geographic regions: findings from the National Health Survey, 2013.巴西各地理区域健康预期寿命的不平等:2013年全国健康调查结果
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov 17;15(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0432-7.
9
Inequality, poverty, and material deprivation in new and old members of the European Union.欧盟新老成员国中的不平等、贫困与物质匮乏问题。
Croat Med J. 2007 Oct;48(5):636-52.
10
Good for women, good for men, bad for people: Simpson's paradox and the importance of sex-specific analysis in observational studies.对女性有益,对男性有益,对所有人有害:辛普森悖论以及观察性研究中性别特异性分析的重要性。
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001 Nov;10(9):867-72. doi: 10.1089/152460901753285769.

引用本文的文献

1
Specialized medical care in primary care using telemedicine in Northeast Brazil: a descriptive study, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, 2022-2023.2022 - 2023年在巴西北里奥格兰德州使用远程医疗在基层医疗中提供专科医疗服务:一项描述性研究
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025 Mar 14;34:e20240256. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240256.en. eCollection 2025.
2
[Food insecurity and household water insecurity: a population-based study in a municipality in the Amazon River basin, Brazil].[粮食不安全与家庭用水不安全:巴西亚马逊河流域某城市的一项基于人群的研究]
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 May 17;40(4):e00125423. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT125423. eCollection 2024.
3
Colorectal cancer disparities in Latin America: Mortality trends 1990-2019 and a paradox association with human development.
拉美地区结直肠癌的差异:1990-2019 年的死亡率趋势与人类发展的悖论关联。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 25;18(8):e0289675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289675. eCollection 2023.