Nagaraj Madhuri B, Lowe Jessica E, Marinica Alexander L, Morshedi Brandon B, Isaacs S Marshal, Miller Brian L, Chou Andrew D, Cripps Michael W, Dumas Ryan P
Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(1):10-17. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.2000684. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
Handoffs by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel suffer from poor structure, inattention, and interruptions. The relationship between the quality of EMS communication and the non-technical performance of trauma teams remains unknown.
We analyzed 3 months of trauma resuscitation videos (highest acuity activations or patients with an Injury Severity Score [ISS] of ≥15). Handoffs were scored using the mechanism-injury-signs-treatment (MIST) framework for completeness (0-20), efficiency (category jumps), interruptions, and timeliness. Trauma team non-technical performance was scored using the Trauma Non-Technical Skills (T-NOTECHS) scale (5-15).
We analyzed 99 videos. Handoffs lasted a median of 62 seconds [IQR: 43-74], scored 11 [10-13] for completeness, and had 2 [1-3] interruptions. Most interruptions were verbal (85.2%) and caused by the trauma team (64.9%). Most handoffs (92%) were efficient with 2 or fewer jumps. Patient transfer during handoff occurred in 53.5% of the videos; EMS providers giving handoff helped transfer in 69.8% of the Primary surveys began during handoff in 42.4% of the videos. Resuscitation teams who scored in the top-quartile on the T-NOTECHS (>11) had higher MIST scores than teams in lower quartiles (13 [11.25-14.75] vs. 11 [10-13]; < .01). There were no significant differences in ISS, efficiency, timeliness, or interruptions between top- and lower-quartile groups.
There is a relationship between EMS MIST completeness and high performance of non-technical skill by trauma teams. Trauma video review (TVR) can help identify modifiable behaviors to improve EMS handoff and resuscitation efforts and therefore trauma team performance.
紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员进行的交接班存在结构不佳、注意力不集中和中断等问题。EMS沟通质量与创伤团队的非技术表现之间的关系尚不清楚。
我们分析了3个月的创伤复苏视频(最高 acuity 激活或损伤严重程度评分 [ISS]≥15的患者)。使用机制-损伤-体征-治疗(MIST)框架对接班进行完整性(0-20)、效率(类别跳跃)、中断和及时性评分。创伤团队的非技术表现使用创伤非技术技能(T-NOTECHS)量表(5-15)进行评分。
我们分析了99个视频。交接班的中位持续时间为62秒[四分位间距:43-74],完整性得分为11[10-13],有2[1-3]次中断。大多数中断是口头的(85.2%),由创伤团队引起(64.9%)。大多数交接班(92%)效率高,跳跃次数为2次或更少。53.5%的视频在交接班期间进行了患者转运;进行交接班的EMS提供者在69.8%的情况下协助转运。42.4%的视频在交接班期间开始了初次检查。在T-NOTECHS得分处于上四分位数(>11)的复苏团队的MIST得分高于处于下四分位数的团队(13[11.25-14.75]对11[10-13];P<.01)。上四分位数组和下四分位数组在ISS、效率、及时性或中断方面没有显著差异。
EMS的MIST完整性与创伤团队的非技术技能的高性能之间存在关系。创伤视频审查(TVR)有助于识别可改变的行为,以改善EMS交接班和复苏工作,从而提高创伤团队的表现。