Suppr超能文献

使用创伤视频回顾评估急救医疗服务交接及创伤团队的非技术技能。

Using Trauma Video Review to Assess EMS Handoff and Trauma Team Non-Technical Skills.

作者信息

Nagaraj Madhuri B, Lowe Jessica E, Marinica Alexander L, Morshedi Brandon B, Isaacs S Marshal, Miller Brian L, Chou Andrew D, Cripps Michael W, Dumas Ryan P

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(1):10-17. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.2000684. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Handoffs by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel suffer from poor structure, inattention, and interruptions. The relationship between the quality of EMS communication and the non-technical performance of trauma teams remains unknown.

METHODS

We analyzed 3 months of trauma resuscitation videos (highest acuity activations or patients with an Injury Severity Score [ISS] of ≥15). Handoffs were scored using the mechanism-injury-signs-treatment (MIST) framework for completeness (0-20), efficiency (category jumps), interruptions, and timeliness. Trauma team non-technical performance was scored using the Trauma Non-Technical Skills (T-NOTECHS) scale (5-15).

RESULTS

We analyzed 99 videos. Handoffs lasted a median of 62 seconds [IQR: 43-74], scored 11 [10-13] for completeness, and had 2 [1-3] interruptions. Most interruptions were verbal (85.2%) and caused by the trauma team (64.9%). Most handoffs (92%) were efficient with 2 or fewer jumps. Patient transfer during handoff occurred in 53.5% of the videos; EMS providers giving handoff helped transfer in 69.8% of the Primary surveys began during handoff in 42.4% of the videos. Resuscitation teams who scored in the top-quartile on the T-NOTECHS (>11) had higher MIST scores than teams in lower quartiles (13 [11.25-14.75] vs. 11 [10-13]; < .01). There were no significant differences in ISS, efficiency, timeliness, or interruptions between top- and lower-quartile groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a relationship between EMS MIST completeness and high performance of non-technical skill by trauma teams. Trauma video review (TVR) can help identify modifiable behaviors to improve EMS handoff and resuscitation efforts and therefore trauma team performance.

摘要

目的

紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员进行的交接班存在结构不佳、注意力不集中和中断等问题。EMS沟通质量与创伤团队的非技术表现之间的关系尚不清楚。

方法

我们分析了3个月的创伤复苏视频(最高 acuity 激活或损伤严重程度评分 [ISS]≥15的患者)。使用机制-损伤-体征-治疗(MIST)框架对接班进行完整性(0-20)、效率(类别跳跃)、中断和及时性评分。创伤团队的非技术表现使用创伤非技术技能(T-NOTECHS)量表(5-15)进行评分。

结果

我们分析了99个视频。交接班的中位持续时间为62秒[四分位间距:43-74],完整性得分为11[10-13],有2[1-3]次中断。大多数中断是口头的(85.2%),由创伤团队引起(64.9%)。大多数交接班(92%)效率高,跳跃次数为2次或更少。53.5%的视频在交接班期间进行了患者转运;进行交接班的EMS提供者在69.8%的情况下协助转运。42.4%的视频在交接班期间开始了初次检查。在T-NOTECHS得分处于上四分位数(>11)的复苏团队的MIST得分高于处于下四分位数的团队(13[11.25-14.75]对11[10-13];P<.01)。上四分位数组和下四分位数组在ISS、效率、及时性或中断方面没有显著差异。

结论

EMS的MIST完整性与创伤团队的非技术技能的高性能之间存在关系。创伤视频审查(TVR)有助于识别可改变的行为,以改善EMS交接班和复苏工作,从而提高创伤团队的表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验