McQueen Carl, Smyth Mike, Fisher Joanne, Perkins Gavin
Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick Gibbet Hill, CV4 7AL Coventry, UK.
University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill, CV4 7AL Coventry, UK.
Injury. 2015 Jul;46(7):1197-206. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.03.033. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
The deployment of Enhanced Care Teams (ECTs) capable of delivering advanced clinical interventions for patients at the scene of incidents is commonplace by Emergency Medical Services in most developed countries. It is unclear whether primary dispatch models for ECT resources are more efficient at targeting deployment to patients with severe trauma than secondary dispatch, following requests from EMS personnel at scene. The objective of this study was to review the evidence for primary and secondary models in the targeted dispatch of ECT resources to patients with severe traumatic injury.
This review was completed in accordance with a protocol developed using the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted a search of the MEDLINE, EmBase, Web of Knowledge/Science databases and the Cochrane library, focussed on subject headings and keywords involving the dispatch of ECT resources by Emergency Medical Services. Design and results of each study were described. Heterogeneity in the design of the included studies precluded the completion of a meta-analysis. A narrative synthesis of the results therefore was performed.
Five hundred and forty-eight articles were screened, and 16 were included. Only one study compared the performance of the different models of dispatch. A non-statistically significant reduction in the length of time for HEMS resources to reach incident scenes of 4min was found when primary dispatch protocols were utilised compared to requests from EMS personnel at scene. No effect on mortality; severity of injury or proportion of patients admitted to intensive care was observed. The remaining studies examined the processes utilised within current primary dispatch models but did not perform any comparative analysis with existing secondary dispatch models.
This review identifies a lack of evidence supporting the role of primary dispatch models in targeting the deployment of Enhanced Care Teams to patients with severe injuries. It is therefore not possible to identify a model for ECT dispatch within pre-hospital systems that optimises resource utilisation. Further studies are required to assess the efficiency of systems utilised at each stage of the process used to dispatch Enhanced Care Team resources to incidents within regionalised pre-hospital trauma systems.
在大多数发达国家,紧急医疗服务部门在事故现场为患者提供高级临床干预的强化护理团队(ECTs)的部署很常见。目前尚不清楚,在接到现场急救人员的请求后,ECT资源的一级调度模式在将资源部署到严重创伤患者方面是否比二级调度更有效。本研究的目的是回顾在将ECT资源有针对性地调度到严重创伤患者方面,一级和二级模式的相关证据。
本综述按照使用PRISMA指南制定的方案完成。我们对MEDLINE、EmBase、知识网络/科学数据库和Cochrane图书馆进行了检索,重点关注与紧急医疗服务部门调度ECT资源相关的主题词和关键词。描述了每项研究的设计和结果。纳入研究的设计存在异质性,无法完成荟萃分析。因此,对结果进行了叙述性综合分析。
共筛选了548篇文章,纳入16篇。只有一项研究比较了不同调度模式的性能。与现场急救人员的请求相比,采用一级调度协议时,发现直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)资源到达事故现场的时间非统计学显著缩短了4分钟。未观察到对死亡率、损伤严重程度或入住重症监护病房患者比例的影响。其余研究考察了当前一级调度模式中使用的流程,但未与现有的二级调度模式进行任何比较分析。
本综述发现缺乏证据支持一级调度模式在将强化护理团队部署到重伤患者方面的作用。因此,无法确定院前系统中优化资源利用的ECT调度模式。需要进一步研究来评估在将强化护理团队资源调度到区域化院前创伤系统内的事故的过程中,每个阶段所使用系统的效率。