Suppr超能文献

通过一份探索性问卷评估北美电力公司工人热应激和热应变的决定因素。

Determinants of heat stress and strain in electrical utilities workers across North America as assessed by means of an exploratory questionnaire.

作者信息

Flouris Andreas D, Ioannou Leonidas G, Notley Sean R, Kenny Glen P

机构信息

FAME Laboratory, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, Trikala, Greece.

Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2022 Jan;19(1):12-22. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2021.2001475. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

Abstract

Previous field studies monitoring small groups of participants showed that heat stress in the electrical utilities industry may be detrimental to worker health and safety. Our aim in this study was to characterize heat stress and strain in electrical utilities workers across North America. A total of 428 workers in the power generation, transmission, and distribution industry across 16 U.S. states and 3 Canadian Provinces completed a two-part on-line questionnaire anonymously. The first part comprised 13 general questions on the employee's workplace location, role in the organization, years of experience, general duties, average work shift duration, and other job-related information. It also included two questions on self-reported heat stress. The second part consisted of the "Heat Strain Score Index" (HSSI), a validated questionnaire which evaluates heat stress at the workplace as "safe level" (score ≤13.5: worker experiences no/low heat strain), "caution level" (score 13.6 to 18.0: moderate risk for heat strain), and "danger level" (score >18.0: high risk for heat strain). In addition to the survey, we obtained meteorological data from weather stations in proximity (12.3 ± 12.2 km) to the work locations. Based on the HSSI, 32.9%, 22.3%, and 44.4% of the responders' workplaces were diagnosed as "safe level," "caution level," and "danger level," respectively. The HSSI varied significantly depending on the occupation from 4.9 ± 3.2 in contact center workforce to 19.1 ± 5.4 in mechanics ( < 0.001), and demonstrated moderate linear relationships with summertime (June, July, August) midday air temperature (r = 0.317,  < 0.001) and outdoor midday Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature (r = 0.322,  < 0.001). The highest HSSI was observed in mechanics, machine operators in line installations, line workers, electricians, and meter-readers. We conclude that electrical utilities workers experience instances of severe environmental heat stress resulting in elevated levels of heat strain, particularly when performing physically demanding tasks (e.g., manually climbing utility poles, installing lines).

摘要

先前监测小群体参与者的实地研究表明,电力行业的热应激可能对工人的健康和安全有害。我们在这项研究中的目的是描述北美电力行业工人的热应激和热应变情况。美国16个州和加拿大3个省的发电、输电和配电行业的428名工人匿名完成了一份分为两部分的在线问卷。第一部分包括13个关于员工工作场所位置、在组织中的角色、工作年限、一般职责、平均轮班时长以及其他与工作相关信息的一般性问题。它还包括两个关于自我报告的热应激问题。第二部分由“热应变评分指数”(HSSI)组成,这是一份经过验证的问卷,将工作场所的热应激评估为“安全水平”(得分≤13.5:工人无/低热应变)、“警示水平”(得分13.6至18.0:热应变中度风险)和“危险水平”(得分>18.0:热应变高风险)。除了调查,我们还从距离工作地点较近(12.3±12.2公里)的气象站获取了气象数据。根据HSSI,分别有32.9%、22.3%和44.4%的受访者工作场所被诊断为“安全水平”、“警示水平”和“危险水平”。HSSI因职业不同而有显著差异,从客服中心工作人员的4.9±3.2到机械师的19.1±5.4(<0.001),并且与夏季(6月、7月、8月)中午气温(r = 0.317,<0.001)和室外中午湿球黑球温度(r = 0.322,<0.001)呈中度线性关系。在机械师、线路安装中的机器操作员、线路工人、电工和抄表员中观察到最高的HSSI。我们得出结论,电力行业工人会经历严重的环境热应激情况,导致热应变水平升高,特别是在执行体力要求较高的任务时(例如手动攀爬电线杆、安装线路)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验