• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冷圈套息肉切除术治疗后复发的良性病变可重复进行冷圈套息肉切除术。

Repeat Cold Snare Polypectomy Can Be Performed for Recurrent Benign Lesions After Cold Snare Polypectomy.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.

Department of Surgical Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jul;67(7):3192-3199. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07292-9. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-021-07292-9
PMID:34731360
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recurrence after cold snare polypectomy (CSP) sometimes occurs. We assessed the feasibility of repeat CSP for recurrence after CSP.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed recurrent lesions after CSP which were resected by repeat CSP from 2016 to 2021 in our institution and analyzed clinical outcomes of repeat CSP, comparing those of non-recurrent 454 lesions receiving standard CSP in 2016 and follow-up colonoscopy. We also analyzed the recurrent rate among cases receiving follow-up in both groups. Indication of repeat CSP was lesions diagnosed as benign tumors of ≤ 10 mm.

RESULTS

We analyzed 80 lesions receiving repeat CSP. The polyp size (mean ± standard deviation: SD) was 4.1 ± 2.3 mm (range 2-10 mm). The right-sided colon and non-polypoid morphology rates were 66.3% and 43.8%, respectively. Histopathological diagnosis was 66 adenomas, 12 sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), 1 SSL with dysplasia, and 1 high-grade dysplasia. The procedure time (min, mean ± SD) of repeat CSP was 0.9 ± 0.8. Regarding the comparison of repeat CSP/ standard CSP group, the en bloc resection and histopathological complete resection rates were 78.8%/ 98.0% (p < 0.001) and 43.8%/59.6% (p = 0.007) and the rates of perioperative hemorrhage requiring endoscopic clipping were 1.3%/ 1.0% (p = 0.646). There were no postoperative hemorrhage and perforation in both groups (p = 1.0). Among lesions receiving follow-up colonoscopy, the mean recurrence rates (number, median follow-up period: interquartile) of repeat CSP and standard CSP group were 2.0% (1/50, 12 months: 12-24) versus 0.7% (3/454, 12 months: 12-24) (p = 0.862).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat CSP for benign recurrent lesions after CSP was safe and feasible.

摘要

背景和目的

冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)后有时会复发。我们评估了对 CSP 后复发进行重复 CSP 的可行性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2016 年至 2021 年我院对 CSP 后复发的病变进行重复 CSP 切除的患者,分析了重复 CSP 的临床结果,并比较了 2016 年接受标准 CSP 切除和随访结肠镜检查的 454 例无复发病变的结果。我们还分析了两组中接受随访的病例的复发率。重复 CSP 的适应证为诊断为良性肿瘤的病变,大小≤10mm。

结果

我们分析了 80 例接受重复 CSP 的患者。息肉大小(平均值±标准差:SD)为 4.1±2.3mm(范围 2-10mm)。右侧结肠和非息肉样形态的比例分别为 66.3%和 43.8%。组织病理学诊断为 66 例腺瘤、12 例无蒂锯齿状病变(SSLs)、1 例 SSL 伴异型增生和 1 例高级别异型增生。重复 CSP 的手术时间(min,平均值±SD)为 0.9±0.8。关于重复 CSP/标准 CSP 组的比较,整块切除和组织学完全切除率分别为 78.8%/98.0%(p<0.001)和 43.8%/59.6%(p=0.007),围手术期需要内镜夹闭止血的比例分别为 1.3%/1.0%(p=0.646)。两组均无术后出血和穿孔(p=1.0)。在接受随访结肠镜检查的病变中,重复 CSP 和标准 CSP 组的平均复发率(例数,中位数随访时间:四分位间距)分别为 2.0%(1/50,12 个月:12-24)和 0.7%(3/454,12 个月:12-24)(p=0.862)。

结论

对 CSP 后良性复发性病变进行重复 CSP 是安全可行的。

相似文献

1
Repeat Cold Snare Polypectomy Can Be Performed for Recurrent Benign Lesions After Cold Snare Polypectomy.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗后复发的良性病变可重复进行冷圈套息肉切除术。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jul;67(7):3192-3199. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07292-9. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
2
Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow-up is needed: a single-centre retrospective study.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗大型无蒂锯齿状病变是安全的,但需要随访:一项单中心回顾性研究。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Apr;9(3):370-377. doi: 10.1177/2050640620964641. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Local recurrence and its risk factors after cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗结直肠息肉后局部复发及其危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2918-2925. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07072-7. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
4
Recurrence rate and lesions characteristics after cold snare polypectomy of high-grade dysplasia and T1 lesions: A multicenter analysis.高级别异型增生和 T1 病变冷圈套息肉切除术后的复发率和病变特征:一项多中心分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec;36(12):3337-3344. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15625. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
5
Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.冷圈套息肉切除术和冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗 10-19mm 无蒂结直肠息肉的有效性和安全性:一项多中心观察性队列研究。
Endoscopy. 2023 Jul;55(7):627-635. doi: 10.1055/a-2029-9539. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
6
Resection rates and safety profile of cold vs. hot snare polypectomy in polyps sized 5-10 mm and 11-20 mm.冷圈套与热圈套息肉切除术治疗 5-10mm 和 11-20mm 大小息肉的切除率和安全性分析。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Apr;51(4):536-541. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
7
Histopathological analysis of cold snare polypectomy and its indication for colorectal polyps 10-14 mm in diameter.直径 10-14 毫米结直肠息肉冷圈套切除术的组织病理学分析及其适应证。
Dig Endosc. 2017 Jul;29(5):594-601. doi: 10.1111/den.12825. Epub 2017 May 17.
8
Cold snare polypectomy vs. hot snare polypectomy vs. argon plasma coagulation for small (5-9mm) left-sided colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized trial.冷圈套息肉切除术与热圈套息肉切除术和氩等离子体凝固术治疗左侧结直肠小息肉(5-9mm):一项前瞻性随机试验。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec 1;33(1S Suppl 1):e909-e915. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002300.
9
Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.内镜转诊中心导向的挑战性结直肠病变内镜黏膜下剥离术的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.060. Epub 2012 May 31.
10
Piecemeal cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile serrated lesions: a retrospective comparison across two successive periods.分段冷圈套息肉切除术与传统内镜黏膜切除术治疗大型无蒂锯齿状病变的回顾性比较:两个连续时期的比较。
Gut. 2021 Sep;70(9):1691-1697. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321753. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention and treatment of recurrence after endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.大肠广基息肉内镜切除术后复发的防治
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jul 16;17(7):107746. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107746.
2
Standard Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Precutting Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using Novel Disk-Tip Snare for Colorectal Lesions.标准内镜黏膜切除术与使用新型盘状圈套器的预切开内镜黏膜切除术治疗结直肠病变的比较
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 May;68(5):2030-2039. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07833-4. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental factors, medical and family history, and comorbidities associated with primary biliary cholangitis in Japan: a multicenter case-control study.日本原发性胆汁性胆管炎的环境因素、医疗和家族史及合并症:一项多中心病例对照研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan;57(1):19-29. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01836-6. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
2
Risk of Delayed Bleeding after Cold Snare Polypectomy in Patients with Antithrombotic Therapy.抗血栓治疗患者冷圈套息肉切除术后延迟出血的风险。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 May;67(5):1869-1878. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06984-6. Epub 2021 May 10.
3
Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection.
内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗内镜黏膜切除术后复发性结直肠肿瘤的可行性
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2019 Jul-Sep;82(3):375-378.