• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems in Malignancy Risk Stratification of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.

作者信息

Kim Bo Hyun

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2021 Oct;36(5):974-976. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2021.1287. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

DOI:10.3803/EnM.2021.1287
PMID:34731933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8566117/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems in Malignancy Risk Stratification of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在甲状腺结节恶性风险分层中的比较
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2021 Oct;36(5):974-976. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2021.1287. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Comparison of Korean vs. American Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Malignancy Risk Assessment of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.韩国与美国甲状腺影像报告与数据系统在评估不确定甲状腺结节恶性风险中的比较。
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2021 Oct;36(5):1111-1120. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2021.1208. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
3
Ultrasonography scoring systems can rule out malignancy in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.超声检查评分系统可排除细胞学检查结果不确定的甲状腺结节的恶性病变。
Endocrine. 2017 Aug;57(2):256-261. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1148-6. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
4
TIRADS score is of limited clinical value for risk stratification of indeterminate cytological results.TIRADS 评分对于不确定的细胞学结果的风险分层具有有限的临床价值。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2018 Jul;179(1):13-20. doi: 10.1530/EJE-18-0078. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
5
Validation of Three Scoring Risk-Stratification Models for Thyroid Nodules.甲状腺结节三种评分风险分层模型的验证。
Thyroid. 2017 Dec;27(12):1550-1557. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0363.
6
Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) of the American College of Radiology (ACR) for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules >1 cm with indeterminate cytology.美国放射学会（ACR）的甲状腺影像报告和数据系统（TI-RADS）用于预测细胞学结果不确定的直径大于1cm的甲状腺结节的恶性可能性。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2019 May;47(5):523-525. doi: 10.1002/dc.24119. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
7
Malignancy risk stratification in thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic results at cytologic examination: combination of thyroid imaging reporting and data system and the Bethesda System.甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学检查结果不明确的甲状腺结节恶性风险分层：甲状腺影像报告和数据系统与 Bethesda 系统的联合应用。
Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):287-95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140359. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
8
Validation of American Thyroid Association Ultrasound Risk Assessment of Thyroid Nodules Selected for Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration.美国甲状腺协会超声评估甲状腺结节细针抽吸术适应证的验证。
Thyroid. 2017 Aug;27(8):1077-1082. doi: 10.1089/thy.2016.0555. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
9
Does a higher American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) score forecast an increased risk of malignancy? A correlation study of ACR TI-RADS with FNA cytology in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.美国放射学院甲状腺影像报告和数据系统（ACR TI-RADS）评分较高是否预示恶性风险增加？评估甲状腺结节时 ACR TI-RADS 与细针穿刺细胞学的相关性研究。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Jul;128(7):470-481. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22254. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
10
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Patterns by K-TIRADS and 2015 ATA Guidelines in Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules and Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance.超声 K-TIRADS 分类与 2015 年 ATA 指南在甲状腺结节及滤泡性肿瘤良恶性危险分层中的诊断效能
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Aug;213(2):444-450. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20961. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Korean vs. American Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Malignancy Risk Assessment of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.韩国与美国甲状腺影像报告与数据系统在评估不确定甲状腺结节恶性风险中的比较。
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2021 Oct;36(5):1111-1120. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2021.1208. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
2
Diagnostic Performance of the Modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for Thyroid Malignancy: A Multicenter Validation Study.改良版韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断性能：一项多中心验证研究。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1579-1586. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0230. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
3
Diagnostic performance of the modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for thyroid malignancy according to nodule size: a comparison with five society guidelines.根据结节大小评估改良韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断效能：与五项学会指南的比较
Ultrasonography. 2021 Oct;40(4):474-485. doi: 10.14366/usg.20148. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
4
Performance of the ACR TI-RADS and EU TI-RADS scoring systems in the diagnostic work-up of thyroid nodules in a real-life series using histology as reference standard.使用组织学作为参考标准，在真实系列中评估 ACR TI-RADS 和 EU TI-RADS 评分系统在甲状腺结节诊断中的表现。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2020 Nov;183(5):521-528. doi: 10.1530/EJE-20-0682.
5
2020 Chinese guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: the C-TIRADS.2020年中国甲状腺结节超声恶性风险分层指南：C-TIRADS
Endocrine. 2020 Nov;70(2):256-279. doi: 10.1007/s12020-020-02441-y. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Diagnostic Value of Six Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS) in Cytologically Equivocal Thyroid Nodules.六种甲状腺影像报告和数据系统（TIRADS）对甲状腺细针穿刺结果不明确结节的诊断价值
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 17;9(7):2281. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072281.
7
Diagnostic Performance of American College of Radiology TI-RADS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统（TI-RADS）的诊断性能：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jan;216(1):38-47. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22691. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
Performance of EU-TIRADS in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis.EU-TIRADS 在甲状腺结节恶性风险分层中的表现：一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2020 Sep;183(3):255-264. doi: 10.1530/EJE-20-0204.
9
Diagnostic Performance of Four Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.四种超声风险分层系统的诊断性能：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thyroid. 2020 Aug;30(8):1159-1168. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0812. Epub 2020 May 19.
10
Concordance of Three International Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules Classified by Ultrasonography and Diagnostic Performance of Biopsy Criteria.超声检查分类的甲状腺结节三种国际指南的一致性和活检标准的诊断性能。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Jan;21(1):108-116. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0215.