Division of Pediatric Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 E. Chicago Ave., Chicago, IL 60611, United States; Department of Surgery, Northwestern School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Surgical Outcomes Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Sep;57(9):137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.09.040. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
During post-discharge telephone calls after pediatric surgery, clinicians must rely on parents/caregivers' assessment of symptoms, which can be inaccurate and often lead to unnecessary emergency department (ED) visits. Physiology (heart rate and physical activity) data from consumer-grade wearables, e.g., Fitbit™, may inform clinical decision making, yet there has been little study of clinician interpretation of this data. This study assessed whether wearable data availability, during simulated telephone calls about postoperative, post-discharge pediatric patients, affects clinician decision making.
Three simulated telephone call scenarios were presented to a diverse group of pediatric surgery clinicians. The scenarios were based on actual postoperative patients (scenarios 1 and 3 have worrisome symptoms and scenario 2 has non-worrisome symptoms) who had worn a Fitbit™ postoperatively. Each scenario was presented to clinicians (1) without any wearable data; (2) with "concerning" wearable data; and (3) with "reassuring" wearable data. Clinicians rated their likelihood, on a scale of 1-10, of recommending an emergency department (ED) visit for the three instances of each scenario, 10 being definitely ED.
Twenty-four (24) clinicians participated in the study. When presented with "reassuring" wearable data, clinicians' likelihood of recommending an ED visit decreased from a median score of 6 to 1 (p < 0.001) for scenario 1 and from 9 to 3 (p < 0.001) for scenario 3. When presented with "concerning" wearable data, the median likelihood of recommending an ED visit increased from 1 to 6 (p = 0.003) for scenario 2.
This study showed that wearable data affect clinicians' decision making and may be useful in triaging postoperative, post-discharge pediatric patients.
V.
在儿科手术后的电话随访期间,临床医生必须依赖于父母/照顾者对症状的评估,但这种评估可能不准确,并且经常导致不必要的急诊就诊。来自消费级可穿戴设备(如 Fitbit™)的生理数据(心率和身体活动)可能为临床决策提供信息,但对临床医生对这些数据的解释的研究甚少。本研究评估了在模拟针对术后、出院后儿科患者的电话随访期间,可穿戴设备数据的可用性是否会影响临床医生的决策。
向一组多元化的儿科手术临床医生介绍了三个模拟电话随访场景。这些场景基于实际术后患者(场景 1 和 3 有令人担忧的症状,场景 2 则没有),他们在术后佩戴了 Fitbit™。每个场景都向临床医生展示了以下三种情况:(1)没有任何可穿戴数据;(2)“令人担忧”的可穿戴数据;(3)“令人安心”的可穿戴数据。临床医生对三种情况下每个场景的紧急就诊(ED)的可能性进行了 1-10 的评分,10 表示肯定会去 ED。
24 名(24)临床医生参与了这项研究。当提供“令人安心”的可穿戴数据时,临床医生对场景 1 推荐 ED 就诊的可能性从中位数 6 分降至 1 分(p<0.001),对场景 3 的推荐 ED 就诊的可能性从中位数 9 分降至 3 分(p<0.001)。当提供“令人担忧”的可穿戴数据时,场景 2 中推荐 ED 就诊的可能性中位数从 1 分升至 6 分(p=0.003)。
这项研究表明,可穿戴设备数据会影响临床医生的决策,并且可能有助于对术后、出院后的儿科患者进行分诊。
V。