Effect of Hysterectomy due to Benign Diseases on Female Sexual Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Determination of the effect of hysterectomy caused by benign diseases on female sexual function.

DATA SOURCES

A search was performed on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, ProQuest, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Embase databases. The keywords included hysterectomy (as exposure) and female sexual function (as outcome). Original English observational studies, including cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies published as of February 2021, which reported an association between any type of hysterectomy caused by benign female disease and sexual function as an outcome, were included in the study. Studies in participants who received hormone replacement therapy and had sex other than heterosexuals were not included. There was no limit to the initial search period, and articles published by February 2021 were searched.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

The search process resulted in the retrieval of 5587 potentially related articles. After removing duplicated studies, the title and abstract were reviewed and 77 articles remained with the removal of unrelated items. The full text of 14 articles was published in non-English languages, and 52 articles were removed because they did not meet the inclusion criteria, and finally, 11 articles were included in the final analysis.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. The evidence was synthesized using meta-analysis via random-effect model with the Der Simonian and Laird weighted method. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot and Begg's and Egger's tests. The pooled standardized mean difference for sexual function in hysterectomy vs nonhysterectomy group was 0.08 (95% confidence interval, -0.38 to 0.55; I = 96.8%; χ = 307.94; p <.001; τ = 0.59). Publication bias and small study effects were not detected. The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the possible sources of heterogeneity are the World Bank countries classification and type of hysterectomy (in some studies, the type of hysterectomy was not specified separately for the study groups; because of this, comparisons were made between Total and supracervical/total). Pooled standardized mean difference was affected by the type of sexual function scale, World Bank countries classification, type of hysterectomy, ovary status, and reproductive status. The results of meta-regression analysis also showed that for each month of distance from hysterectomy, women's sexual function score increases by 0.18.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that hysterectomy caused by benign diseases does not change the sexual function significantly.