D.J. Castanelli is senior lecturer, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, consultant anesthetist, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, and PhD candidate, Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-809X .
J.M. Weller is professor and head, Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, and specialist anesthetist, Department of Anaesthesia, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3029-1390 .
Acad Med. 2022 May 1;97(5):704-710. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004501. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
In competency-based medical education, workplace-based assessment provides trainees with an opportunity for guidance and supervisors the opportunity to judge the trainees' clinical practice. Learning from assessment is enhanced when trainees reveal their thinking and are open to critique, which requires trust in the assessor. If supervisors knew more about how trainees come to trust them in workplace-based assessment, they could better engender trainee trust and improve trainees' learning experience.
From August 2018 to September 2019, semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 postgraduate anesthesia trainees across Australia and New Zealand. The transcripts were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory methods sensitized by a sociocultural view of learning informed by Wenger's communities of practice theory.
Participants described a continuum from a necessary initial trust to an experience-informed dynamic trust. Trainees assumed initial trust in supervisors based on accreditation, reputation, and a perceived obligation of trustworthiness inherent in the supervisor's role. With experience and time, trainees' trust evolved based on supervisor actions. Deeper levels of trainee trust arose in response to perceived supervisor investment and allowed trainees to devote more emotional and cognitive resources to patient care and learning rather than impression management. Across the continuum from initial trust to experience-informed trust, trainees made rapid trust judgments that were not preceded by conscious deliberation; instead, they represented a learned "feel for the game."
While other factors are involved, our results indicate that the trainee behavior observed in workplace-based assessment is a product of supervisor invitation. Supervisor trustworthiness and investment in trainee development invite trainees to work and present in authentic ways in workplace-based assessment. This authentic engagement, where learners "show themselves" to supervisors and take risks, creates assessment for learning.
在以能力为基础的医学教育中,基于工作场所的评估为学员提供了一个获得指导的机会,也为上级评判学员的临床实践提供了机会。当学员展示自己的想法并接受批评时,他们可以从评估中获得更多的学习,这需要他们对评估者有信心。如果上级更了解学员如何在基于工作场所的评估中信任他们,他们就可以更好地获得学员的信任,提高学员的学习体验。
2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 9 月,对澳大利亚和新西兰的 17 名麻醉学研究生进行了半结构化访谈。使用建构主义扎根理论方法分析转录本,该方法受社会文化学习观的影响,该学习观受 Wenger 的实践共同体理论的启发。
参与者描述了从必要的初始信任到经验驱动的动态信任的连续体。学员基于认可、声誉以及上级在其角色中固有的值得信赖的感知义务,对上级产生初始信任。随着经验和时间的推移,学员的信任会根据上级的行为而发展。更深层次的学员信任源于感知到的上级投入,这使学员能够将更多的情感和认知资源投入到患者护理和学习中,而不是印象管理。在从初始信任到经验驱动的信任的连续体中,学员会迅速做出信任判断,而这些判断并不是在有意识的考虑之前做出的;相反,它们代表了一种习得的“对游戏的感觉”。
尽管还有其他因素,但我们的研究结果表明,在基于工作场所的评估中观察到的学员行为是上级邀请的产物。上级的诚信和对学员发展的投入邀请学员以真实的方式在基于工作场所的评估中工作和展示。这种真实的参与,让学习者向评估者“展示自己”并承担风险,为学习提供评估。