• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期直肠癌局部切除±放化疗与全直肠系膜切除的比较:长期结果的病例匹配分析

Local Excision ± Chemoradiotherapy vs. Total Mesorectal Excision for Early Rectal Cancer: Case-Matched Analysis of Long-Term Results.

作者信息

Pacevicius Julius, Petrauskas Vidas, Pilipavicius Lukas, Dulskas Audrius

机构信息

Department of Abdominal and General Surgery and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2021 Oct 18;8:746784. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.746784. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2021.746784
PMID:34733880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8558343/
Abstract

Our aim was to compare the bowel function and oncologic outcomes following these two treatment modalities. This was a single-center study with 67 patients included between 2009 and 2018. A total of 32 patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) group and 35 transanal local excisions (LE) ± chemoradiation. We performed a case-matched analysis: we matched the patients by age, cancer stage, and comorbidities. Duration of operation, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and long-term functional and oncological outcomes were compared. We calculated oncological outcomes using Cox diagrams. In addition, we used a low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score for the bowel function assessment. Mean operation time in the LE group was 58.8 ± 45 min compared with the TME group that was 121.1 ± 42 min ( = 0.032). Complications were seen in 5.7% in LE group and 15.62% in TME group ( = 0.043). ~85.2% of the patients had no LARS in LE group compared with 54.5% in TME group ( = 0.018). Minor LARS was 7.4% in LE group compared with 31.8% in TME group ( = 0.018); major LARS was 7.4 and 13.7%, respectively ( = 0.474). Hospital stay was 2.77 days in LE group compared with 9.21 days in TME group ( = 0.036). The overall survival was 68.78 months in LE group compared with 74.81 months in TME group ( = 0.964). Our results of a small sample size showed that local excision ± chemoradiation is a rather safe method for early rectal cancer compared with gold standard treatment. In addition, better bowel function is preserved with less postoperative complications and shorter hospital stays.

摘要

我们的目的是比较这两种治疗方式后的肠道功能和肿瘤学结局。这是一项单中心研究,纳入了2009年至2018年间的67例患者。共有32例患者接受了全直肠系膜切除术(TME)组,35例接受了经肛门局部切除术(LE)±放化疗。我们进行了病例匹配分析:根据年龄、癌症分期和合并症对患者进行匹配。比较了手术时间、术后并发症、住院时间以及长期功能和肿瘤学结局。我们使用Cox图计算肿瘤学结局。此外,我们使用低位前切除综合征(LARS)评分来评估肠道功能。LE组的平均手术时间为58.8±45分钟,而TME组为121.1±42分钟(P = 0.032)。LE组的并发症发生率为5.7%,TME组为15.62%(P = 0.043)。LE组约85.2%的患者无LARS,而TME组为54.5%(P = 0.018)。LE组轻度LARS为7.4%,TME组为31.8%(P = 0.018);重度LARS分别为7.4%和13.7%(P = 0.474)。LE组的住院时间为2.77天,TME组为9.21天(P = 0.036)。LE组的总生存期为68.78个月,TME组为74.81个月(P = 0.964)。我们小样本量的结果表明,与金标准治疗相比,局部切除±放化疗是早期直肠癌一种相当安全的方法。此外,其能保留更好的肠道功能,术后并发症更少,住院时间更短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a3/8558343/c7e9c6aacc93/fsurg-08-746784-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a3/8558343/1a2d86a2b49f/fsurg-08-746784-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a3/8558343/d545c3c68f1b/fsurg-08-746784-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a3/8558343/c7e9c6aacc93/fsurg-08-746784-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a3/8558343/1a2d86a2b49f/fsurg-08-746784-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a3/8558343/d545c3c68f1b/fsurg-08-746784-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a3/8558343/c7e9c6aacc93/fsurg-08-746784-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Local Excision ± Chemoradiotherapy vs. Total Mesorectal Excision for Early Rectal Cancer: Case-Matched Analysis of Long-Term Results.早期直肠癌局部切除±放化疗与全直肠系膜切除的比较:长期结果的病例匹配分析
Front Surg. 2021 Oct 18;8:746784. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.746784. eCollection 2021.
2
[Comparison of postoperative bowel function between patients undergoing transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision].经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术患者术后肠功能的比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 25;22(3):246-254.
3
Local excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus total mesorectal excision: a case-matched study in 110 selected high-risk patients with rectal cancer.新辅助放化疗后局部切除与全直肠系膜切除术比较:110 例选择的高危直肠癌患者的病例匹配研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Dec;22(12):1999-2007. doi: 10.1111/codi.15323. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
4
Local excision for ypT2 rectal cancer following preoperative chemoradiation therapy: it should not be justified.术前放化疗后 ypT2 直肠肿瘤行局部切除术:不应该被认可。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;33(4):487-491. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2973-2. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Local Excision After Favorable Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in "Early" Clinical T3 Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis.“早期”临床T3期直肠癌术前放化疗取得良好反应后全直肠系膜切除术与局部切除术的倾向评分分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Sep 1;99(1):136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 17.
6
Survival analysis of local excision vs total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer in pT1/pT2 stage and intermediate pathological risk.局部切除与全直肠系膜切除术治疗 T1/T2 期中低位直肠癌及中危病理患者的生存分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec 9;17(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1763-9.
7
Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Local Excision After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer With Lymph Node Metastasis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.直肠癌术前放化疗后行全直肠系膜切除术与局部切除术治疗淋巴结转移的对比:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jul 1;101(3):630-639. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.02.032. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
8
Does transanal local resection increase morbidity for subsequent total mesorectal excision for early rectal cancer?经肛门局部切除术是否会增加早期直肠癌行全直肠系膜切除术的后续并发症?
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jan;21(1):15-22. doi: 10.1111/codi.14445. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
9
Local excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for mid and low rectal cancer: a multicentric French study from the GRECCAR group.新辅助放化疗后中低位直肠癌的局部切除:来自 GRECCAR 组的一项多中心法国研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Oct;25(10):1973-1980. doi: 10.1111/codi.16742. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
10
Oncologic Safety of Local Excision Compared With Total Mesorectal Excision for ypT0-T1 Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis.ypT0-T1期直肠癌局部切除与全直肠系膜切除的肿瘤学安全性:一项倾向评分分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(20):e3718. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003718.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognosis of Patients Over 60 Years Old With Early Rectal Cancer Undergoing Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery - A Single-Center Experience.60岁以上早期直肠癌患者行经肛门内镜微创手术的预后——单中心经验
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 14;12:888739. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.888739. eCollection 2022.
2
Surgeons' choice for rectal cancer treatment if they were a patient.如果自己是患者,外科医生对直肠癌治疗的选择。
BJS Open. 2022 Jan 6;6(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab141.

本文引用的文献

1
Early-rectal Cancer Treatment: A Decision-tree Making Based on Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.早期直肠癌治疗:基于系统评价和荟萃分析的决策树制作。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 Feb;99(2):89-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.05.035. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Local recurrence after local excision of early rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of completion TME, adjuvant (chemo)radiation, or no additional treatment.局部切除早期直肠癌后的局部复发:全直肠系膜切除术、辅助(放)化疗或不追加治疗的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2020 Dec;107(13):1719-1730. doi: 10.1002/bjs.12040. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
3
Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review.
直肠癌放疗后的迟发性胃肠道毒性:系统评价。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;35(6):977-983. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03595-x. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
4
Mesorectal radiotherapy for early stage rectal cancer: A novel target volume.早期直肠癌的直肠系膜放疗:一种新的靶区体积。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020 Feb 4;21:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.02.001. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Is Previous Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Early Rectal Cancer a Risk Factor of Worse Outcome following Salvage Surgery A Case-Matched Analysis.既往经肛门内镜显微手术治疗早期直肠癌是否是挽救性手术后预后较差的危险因素:一项病例对照分析
Visc Med. 2019 Jun;35(3):151-155. doi: 10.1159/000493281. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
6
Differences in colorectal cancer surveillance epidemiology and screening in the WHO European Region.世界卫生组织欧洲区域结直肠癌监测流行病学与筛查的差异
Oncol Lett. 2019 Feb;17(2):2531-2542. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9851. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
7
Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for anal cancer: a systematic literature review.放疗后肛门癌的迟发性胃肠道毒性:系统文献回顾。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Nov;57(11):1427-1437. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1503713. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
8
A systematic review of local excision followed by adjuvant therapy in early rectal cancer: are pT1 tumours the limit?早期直肠癌局部切除加辅助治疗的系统评价:pT1 肿瘤是极限吗?
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;20(10):854-863. doi: 10.1111/codi.14340. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
9
'Watch and wait' in rectal cancer: summary of the current evidence.直肠癌的“观察与等待”:当前证据总结
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;33(9):1159-1168. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3116-5. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
10
Assessment of remaining tumour involved lymph nodes with MRI in patients with complete luminal response after neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer.直肠癌新辅助治疗后管腔完全缓解患者中,用磁共振成像评估残留肿瘤累及的淋巴结
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1087):20170938. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170938. Epub 2018 May 10.