Suppr超能文献

体外心肺复苏术和难治性心搏骤停后的生存:ECPR 是否有益?

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Survival After Refractory Cardiac Arrest: Is ECPR Beneficial?

机构信息

From the Department of Medical Intensive Care, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France.

Department of Anaesthesiology, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2021 Nov 1;67(11):1232-1239. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001391.

Abstract

The level of evidence of expert recommendations for starting extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is low. Therefore, we reported our experience in the field to identify factors associated with hospital mortality. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients treated with ECPR for refractory cardiac arrest without return to spontaneous circulation, regardless of cause, at the Caen University Hospital. Factors associated with hospital mortality were analyzed. Eighty-six patients (i.e., 35 OHCA and 51 IHCA) were included. The overall hospital mortality rate was 81% (i.e., 91% and 75% in the OHCA and IHCA groups, respectively). Factors independently associated with mortality were: sex, age > 44 years, and time from collapse until extracorporeal life support (ECLS) initiation. Interestingly, no-shockable rhythm was not associated with mortality. The receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve values of pH value (0.75 [0.60-0.90]) and time from collapse until ECLS initiation over 61 minutes (0.87 [0.76-0.98]) or 74 minutes (0.90 [0.80-1.00]) for predicting hospital mortality showed good discrimination performance. No-shockable rhythm should not be considered a formal exclusion criterion for ECPR. Time from collapse until ECPR initiation is the cornerstone of success of an ECPR strategy in refractory cardiac arrest.

摘要

专家建议在难治性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)和院内心脏骤停(IHCA)中开始体外心肺复苏(ECPR)的证据水平较低。因此,我们报告了我们在该领域的经验,以确定与医院死亡率相关的因素。我们对所有在卡昂大学医院接受难治性心脏骤停(无论原因如何)且未恢复自主循环的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。分析了与医院死亡率相关的因素。共纳入 86 例患者(即 35 例 OHCA 和 51 例 IHCA)。医院死亡率总体为 81%(即 OHCA 和 IHCA 组分别为 91%和 75%)。与死亡率独立相关的因素是:性别、年龄>44 岁和从心搏骤停到体外生命支持(ECLS)开始的时间。有趣的是,无除颤节律与死亡率无关。pH 值(0.75 [0.60-0.90])和从心搏骤停到 ECLS 开始的时间超过 61 分钟(0.87 [0.76-0.98])或 74 分钟(0.90 [0.80-1.00])的曲线下面积(AUC)值预测医院死亡率的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线值显示出良好的区分性能。无除颤节律不应被视为 ECPR 的正式排除标准。从心搏骤停到 ECPR 开始的时间是难治性心脏骤停中 ECPR 策略成功的关键。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验