Suppr超能文献

RESCUE-IHCA评分作为接受体外心肺复苏的院内心脏骤停患者预测指标的外部验证

External Validation of the RESCUE-IHCA Score as a Predictor for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

作者信息

Ho Yi-Ju, Su Pei-I, Chi Chien-Yu, Tsai Min-Shan, Chen Yih-Sharng, Huang Chien-Hua

机构信息

National Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Department of Emergency Medicine, Yun-Lin, Taiwan.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;25(6):894-902. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18601.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) improves the prognosis of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). The six-factor RESCUE-IHCA score (resuscitation using ECPR during IHCA) was developed to predict outcomes of post-IHCA ECPR-treated adult patients. Our goal was to validate the score in an Asian medical center with a high volume and experience of ECPR performance and to compare the differences in patient characteristics between the current study and the original cohort in a 2022 observational study.

METHOD

For this single-center, retrospective cohort study we enrolled 324 ECPR-treated adult IHCA patients. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We used the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to externally validate the RESCUE-IHCA score. The calibration of the model was tested by the decile calibration plot as well as Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit with an associated -value.

RESULTS

Of the 324 participants, 231 (71%) died before hospital discharge. The discriminative performance of the RESCUE-IHCA score was comparable with the originally validated cohort, with an AUC of 0.63. A prolonged duration of cardiac arrest was associated with an increased risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.03,  = .006). An initial rhythm of ventricular tachycardia (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.51,  = .003), ventricular fibrillation (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.46,  = .003), and palpable pulse (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.92,  = 0.04) were associated with a reduced mortality risk compared to asystole or pulseless electrical activity. In contrast to the original study, age ( = 0.28), resuscitation timing ( = 0.14), disease category ( = 0.18), and pre-existing renal insufficiency ( = 0.12) were not associated with in-hospital death.

CONCLUSION

In external validation, the RESCUE-IHCA score exhibited performance comparable to its original validation within the single-center population. Further investigation on hospital experience, time-of-day effect, and specific disease categories is warranted to improve the selection criteria for ECPR candidates during IHCA.

摘要

背景

体外心肺复苏(ECPR)可改善院内心脏骤停(IHCA)的预后。六因素RESCUE - IHCA评分(用于预测IHCA期间使用ECPR进行复苏的情况)旨在预测接受IHCA后ECPR治疗的成年患者的预后。我们的目标是在一家具有高容量ECPR实施经验的亚洲医疗中心验证该评分,并在一项2022年的观察性研究中比较本研究与原始队列患者特征的差异。

方法

在这项单中心回顾性队列研究中,我们纳入了324例接受ECPR治疗的成年IHCA患者。主要结局是院内死亡率。我们使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)对RESCUE - IHCA评分进行外部验证。通过十分位数校准图以及Hosmer - Lemeshow拟合优度检验及相关P值来测试模型的校准情况。

结果

在324名参与者中,231例(71%)在出院前死亡。RESCUE - IHCA评分的判别性能与最初验证的队列相当,AUC为0.63。心脏骤停持续时间延长与死亡风险增加相关(比值比[OR]1.02,95%置信区间[CI]1.01 - 1.03,P = 0.006)。与心脏停搏或无脉电活动相比,初始心律为室性心动过速(OR 0.14,95% CI 0.04 - 0.51,P = 0.003)、心室颤动(OR 0.11,95% CI 0.03 - 0.46,P = 0.003)和可触及脉搏(OR 0.26,95% CI 0.07 - 0.92,P = 0.04)与死亡风险降低相关。与原始研究不同,年龄(P = 0.28)、复苏时机(P = 0.14)、疾病类别(P = 0.18)和既往肾功能不全(P = 0.12)与院内死亡无关。

结论

在外部验证中,RESCUE - IHCA评分在单中心人群中的表现与其原始验证相当。有必要进一步研究医院经验、一天中的时间效应和特定疾病类别,以改进IHCA期间ECPR候选者的选择标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d337/11610726/42d9fd61518f/wjem-25-894-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验