Suppr超能文献

免疫检查点抑制剂治疗不适合临床试验的晚期实体瘤患者的摄取和生存结果。

Uptake and Survival Outcomes Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Among Trial-Ineligible Patients With Advanced Solid Cancers.

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;7(12):1843-1850. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4971.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are part of standard of care for patients with many advanced solid tumors. Patients with poor performance status or organ dysfunction are traditionally ineligible to partake in pivotal randomized clinical trials of ICIs.

OBJECTIVE

To assess ICI use and survival outcomes among patients with advanced cancers who are traditionally trial ineligible based on poor performance status or organ dysfunction.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 280 predominantly community oncology practices in the US and included 34 131 patients (9318 [27.3%] trial ineligible) who initiated first-line systemic therapy from January 2014 through December 2019 for newly diagnosed metastatic or recurrent nontargetable non-small cell lung, urothelial cell, renal cell, or hepatocellular carcinoma. Data analysis was performed from December 1, 2019, to June 1, 2021.

EXPOSURES

Trial ineligibility (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 or the presence of kidney or liver dysfunction); first-line systemic therapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The association between trial ineligibility and ICI monotherapy uptake was assessed using inverse probability-weighted (IPW) logistic regressions. The comparative survival outcomes following ICI and non-ICI therapy among trial-ineligible patients were assessed using treatment IPW survival analyses. Because we observed nonproportional hazards, we reported 12-month and 36-month restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) and time-varying hazard ratios (HRs) of less than 6 months and 6 months or greater.

RESULTS

Among the overall cohort (n = 34 131), the median (IQR) age was 70 (62-77) years; 23 586 (69%) were White individuals, and 14 478 (42%) were women. Over the study period, the proportion of patients receiving ICI monotherapy increased from 0% to 30.2% among trial-ineligible patients and 0.1% to 19.4% among trial-eligible patients. Trial ineligibility was associated with increased ICI monotherapy use (IPW-adjusted odds ratio compared with non-ICI therapy, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.7-1.9). Among trial-ineligible patients, there were no overall survival differences between ICI monotherapy, ICI combination therapy, and non-ICI therapy at 12 months (RMST, 7.8 vs 7.7 vs 8.1 months) or 36 months (RMST, 15.0 vs 13.9 vs 14.4 months). Compared with non-ICI therapy, ICI monotherapy showed evidence of early harm (IPW-adjusted HR within 6 months, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.2) but late benefit (adjusted HR among patients who survived 6 months, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-0.8).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, compared with trial-eligible patients, trial-ineligible patients with advanced cancers preferentially received first-line ICI therapy. A survival difference was not detected between ICI and non-ICI therapies among trial-ineligible patients. Positive results for ICI in phase 3 trials may not translate to this vulnerable population.

摘要

重要性

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是许多晚期实体瘤标准治疗的一部分。传统上,身体状况不佳或器官功能障碍的患者不符合参加关键的ICI 随机临床试验的条件。

目的

评估传统上因身体状况不佳或器官功能障碍而不符合试验条件的晚期癌症患者使用 ICI 和生存结果。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在美国 280 家主要社区肿瘤学实践中进行的回顾性队列研究,包括 34131 名患者(9318[27.3%]不符合试验条件),他们于 2014 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间新诊断为转移性或复发性不可靶向的非小细胞肺癌、尿路上皮细胞癌、肾细胞癌或肝细胞癌,接受一线全身治疗。数据分析于 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 1 日进行。

暴露

试验不合格(东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态≥2 或存在肾脏或肝脏功能障碍);一线全身治疗。

主要结果和措施

使用逆概率加权(IPW)逻辑回归评估试验不合格与 ICI 单药治疗使用率之间的关联。在试验不合格患者中,使用 ICI 和非 ICI 治疗后的比较生存结果使用治疗 IPW 生存分析进行评估。由于我们观察到非比例风险,因此报告了小于 6 个月和 6 个月或更长时间的 12 个月和 36 个月限制平均生存时间(RMST)和时间变化的危险比(HR)。

结果

在整个队列(n=34131)中,中位(IQR)年龄为 70(62-77)岁;23586(69%)为白种人,14478(42%)为女性。在研究期间,接受 ICI 单药治疗的患者比例从试验不合格患者的 0%增加到 30.2%,从试验合格患者的 0.1%增加到 19.4%。试验不合格与 ICI 单药治疗的使用增加相关(与非 ICI 治疗相比,IPW 调整后的优势比为 1.8;95%CI,1.7-1.9)。在试验不合格患者中,12 个月(RMST,7.8 与 7.7 与 8.1 个月)和 36 个月(RMST,15.0 与 13.9 与 14.4 个月)时,ICI 单药治疗、ICI 联合治疗和非 ICI 治疗之间的总生存无差异。与非 ICI 治疗相比,ICI 单药治疗显示早期危害的证据(6 个月内的 IPW 调整 HR,1.2;95%CI,1.1-1.2),但晚期获益(在存活 6 个月的患者中调整的 HR,0.8;95%CI,0.7-0.8)。

结论和相关性

在这项队列研究中,与试验合格的患者相比,身体状况不佳或器官功能障碍的晚期癌症试验不合格患者优先接受一线 ICI 治疗。在试验不合格的患者中,ICI 和非 ICI 治疗之间没有检测到生存差异。在 III 期试验中 ICI 的阳性结果可能无法转化为这一脆弱人群。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Off-Label Use of First-Line Immunotherapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.一线免疫疗法在转移性肾细胞癌中的非标签使用
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2025 Jun;23(3):102330. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102330. Epub 2025 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验