• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ICI 治疗复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌的总生存期、治疗持续时间和再挑战结果。

Overall Survival, Treatment Duration, and Rechallenge Outcomes With ICI Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic HNSCC.

机构信息

Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2428526. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28526.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28526
PMID:39158913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11333980/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is a frontline treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), but questions remain surrounding optimal duration of therapy, benefits and risks of ICI rechallenge, and efficacy in first vs subsequent lines of therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate survival in US patients receiving ICI-based treatment for R/M HNSCC, compare outcomes associated with treatment discontinuation vs continuation at 1 or 2 years, and assess outcomes after immunotherapy rechallenge.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, population-based cohort study included adult patients in the Flatiron Health nationwide oncology database treated with immunotherapy for R/M HNSCC from 2015 to 2023. Data cutoff was August 31, 2023; data analysis was conducted from December 2023 to February 2024.

EXPOSURES

Treatment continuation vs discontinuation at 1 and 2 years; rechallenge with ICI after at least a 60-day period off ICI therapy without intervening systemic treatment (immediate rechallenge), or with intervening systemic treatment (delayed rechallenge).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall survival (OS) from ICI initiation was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox multivariable regression was used to examine associations of key variables (line of therapy, human papillomavirus [HPV] status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status) with survival.

RESULTS

The cohort included 4549 patients with R/M HNSCC who received ICI-containing therapy (median [IQR] age, 66 [59-72] years; 3551 [78.1%] male; 56 [1.2%] Asian, 260 [5.7%] Black or African American, 3020 [66.4%] White, 1213 [26.7%] other or unknown race; 3226 [70.9%] ECOG performance status 0 or 1). There were 3000 patients (65.9%) who received ICI in frontline and 1207 (26.5%) in second line; 3478 patients (76.5%) received ICI monotherapy. Median (IQR) OS was 10.9 (4.1-29.1) months and was longer in patients who received ICI in frontline therapy (12.2 [4.8-32.0] vs 8.7 [3.2-22.4] months), had HPV-positive cancer (16.6 [6.5-43.9] vs 8.8 [3.5-24.0] months), and had ECOG performance status 0 or 1 (13.5 [5.2-33.9] vs 5.5 [2.0-13.7] months). There were no survival differences on adjusted analysis between patients who stopped vs those who continued ICI at 1 or 2 years. Median (IQR) OS after ICI rechallenge was 15.7 (13.7-21.9) months in the immediate rechallenge group and 9.9 (3.7-18.1) months in the delayed rechallenge group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this large cohort study of patients with R/M HNSCC receiving ICI-based therapy, survival estimates closely mirrored clinical trial results, both in frontline and later-line settings. Discontinuation of ICI in long-term responders at 1 or 2 years may be a reasonable strategy that does not appear to compromise survival. ICI rechallenge was associated with clinical benefit in a subset of patients.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d7/11333980/bca599d5c152/jamanetwopen-e2428526-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d7/11333980/212f61071148/jamanetwopen-e2428526-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d7/11333980/5f3c7d582abf/jamanetwopen-e2428526-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d7/11333980/757b48a0c668/jamanetwopen-e2428526-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d7/11333980/bca599d5c152/jamanetwopen-e2428526-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d7/11333980/212f61071148/jamanetwopen-e2428526-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d7/11333980/5f3c7d582abf/jamanetwopen-e2428526-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d7/11333980/757b48a0c668/jamanetwopen-e2428526-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d7/11333980/bca599d5c152/jamanetwopen-e2428526-g004.jpg
摘要

重要性

免疫检查点抑制 (ICI) 是复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌 (R/M HNSCC) 的一线治疗方法,但关于治疗的最佳持续时间、ICI 再挑战的获益和风险、以及一线与二线治疗的疗效等问题仍存在疑问。

目的

评估美国接受 ICI 治疗 R/M HNSCC 的患者的生存情况,比较治疗 1 年或 2 年后停药与继续治疗的结局,并评估免疫治疗再挑战后的结局。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性、基于人群的队列研究,纳入了来自 2015 年至 2023 年期间在全美范围内接受免疫治疗 R/M HNSCC 的 Flatiron Health 肿瘤学数据库中的成年患者。数据截止日期为 2023 年 8 月 31 日;数据分析于 2023 年 12 月至 2024 年 2 月进行。

暴露因素

治疗 1 年和 2 年后的继续治疗与停药;ICI 治疗至少 60 天后停药且无系统治疗(即刻再挑战),或有系统治疗(延迟再挑战)。

主要结局和测量指标

采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法分析 ICI 起始后的总生存(OS)。采用 Cox 多变量回归分析关键变量(治疗线、人乳头瘤病毒 [HPV] 状态、东部肿瘤协作组 [ECOG] 体能状态)与生存的关系。

结果

该队列包括 4549 例接受 ICI 治疗的 R/M HNSCC 患者(中位[IQR]年龄,66 [59-72] 岁;3551 [78.1%] 为男性;56 [1.2%] 为亚洲人,260 [5.7%] 为黑人或非裔美国人,3020 [66.4%] 为白人,1213 [26.7%] 为其他或未知种族;3226 [70.9%] ECOG 体能状态为 0 或 1)。3000 例(65.9%)患者接受 ICI 一线治疗,1207 例(26.5%)患者接受 ICI 二线治疗;3478 例(76.5%)患者接受 ICI 单药治疗。中位(IQR)OS 为 10.9(4.1-29.1)个月,在接受 ICI 一线治疗的患者中更长(12.2 [4.8-32.0] vs 8.7 [3.2-22.4] 个月),HPV 阳性癌症(16.6 [6.5-43.9] vs 8.8 [3.5-24.0] 个月),ECOG 体能状态为 0 或 1(13.5 [5.2-33.9] vs 5.5 [2.0-13.7] 个月)。在调整分析中,与 1 年或 2 年后停止 ICI 的患者相比,继续接受 ICI 治疗的患者在生存方面没有差异。即刻再挑战组的中位(IQR)OS 为 15.7(13.7-21.9)个月,延迟再挑战组为 9.9(3.7-18.1)个月。

结论和相关性

在这项对接受 ICI 治疗的 R/M HNSCC 患者的大型队列研究中,生存估计与临床试验结果非常接近,无论是在一线还是二线治疗环境中。在 1 年或 2 年后对长期应答者停止 ICI 可能是一种合理的策略,似乎不会影响生存。ICI 再挑战与一部分患者的临床获益相关。

相似文献

1
Overall Survival, Treatment Duration, and Rechallenge Outcomes With ICI Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic HNSCC.ICI 治疗复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌的总生存期、治疗持续时间和再挑战结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2428526. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28526.
2
Outcomes Among Patients With Mucosal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Checkpoint Inhibitors.接受检查点抑制剂治疗的头颈部黏膜鳞状细胞癌患者的结局。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct 1;148(10):918-926. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.2284.
3
Correlates of Cetuximab Efficacy in Recurrent and Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Previously Treated With Immunotherapy.先前接受过免疫治疗的复发和转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌中,西妥昔单抗疗效的相关因素
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Jan;9:e2400741. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00741. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
4
"Off-Label" Use of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Negative or Unknown PD-L1 Status in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.晚期头颈癌中程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)状态为阴性或未知的患者使用检查点抑制剂的“超说明书”应用
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2025 Feb 11;23(3):90-96. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7085.
5
Response to salvage chemotherapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.针对复发和/或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者在免疫检查点抑制剂治疗进展后的挽救性化疗的反应。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Nov;121:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.08.026. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
6
Initial analysis of the synergy of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor and concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.程序性细胞死亡受体 1(PD-1)抑制剂联合同期放化疗治疗复发性/转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的协同作用的初步分析。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jul 4;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02310-8.
7
Outcomes and Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Refractory Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: KCSG HN18-12.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗难治性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的结局和生物标志物:KCSG HN18-12。
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;53(3):671-677. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.824. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
8
Uptake and Survival Outcomes Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Among Trial-Ineligible Patients With Advanced Solid Cancers.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗不适合临床试验的晚期实体瘤患者的摄取和生存结果。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;7(12):1843-1850. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4971.
9
Response rates and survival to systemic therapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor failure in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.复发/转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌中免疫检查点抑制剂治疗失败后接受全身治疗的缓解率和生存率
Oral Oncol. 2020 Feb;101:104523. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104523. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
10
Relationship Between Short-Term Outcomes and PD-L1 Expression Based on Combined Positive Score and Tumor Proportion Score in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Anti-PD-1 Antibody Monotherapy.基于联合阳性评分和肿瘤比例评分的抗PD-1抗体单药治疗复发性或转移性头颈癌的短期疗效与PD-L1表达的关系
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025 Jan;8(1):e70125. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70125.

引用本文的文献

1
Commentary on differential impact of TIM-3 ligands on NK cell function.关于TIM-3配体对自然杀伤细胞功能的差异影响的评论
J Immunother Cancer. 2025 Jul 11;13(7):e012125. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2025-012125.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge in Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.二线免疫检查点抑制剂再挑战治疗晚期或转移性食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性研究
Thorac Cancer. 2025 Jul;16(13):e70131. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.70131.
3
Survival outcomes and response rates among patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Discontinuation of anti‑programmed cell death protein 1 immune checkpoint inhibition after complete remission in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A case report and literature review.头颈部鳞状细胞癌完全缓解后停用抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1免疫检查点抑制剂:一例报告及文献综述
Oncol Lett. 2023 Sep 27;26(5):489. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.14076. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Association Between Duration of Immunotherapy and Overall Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.免疫治疗持续时间与晚期非小细胞肺癌患者总生存期的相关性。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Aug 1;9(8):1075-1082. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.1891.
3
Outcomes Among Patients With Mucosal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Checkpoint Inhibitors.
复发或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的生存结果和缓解率。
Bioinformation. 2025 Jan 31;21(1):44-47. doi: 10.6026/973206300210044. eCollection 2025.
4
Nab-paclitaxel combined with cadonilimab (AK104) as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: protocol for a phase II prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial.纳武利尤单抗联合卡度尼利单抗(AK104)作为晚期胃癌二线治疗:一项II期前瞻性、多中心、单臂临床试验方案
Front Immunol. 2025 Feb 25;16:1519545. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1519545. eCollection 2025.
5
Survival outcomes and optimal candidates for primary tumor resection in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with distant metastasis at initial diagnosis.初诊时伴有远处转移的头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的生存结局及原发肿瘤切除的最佳候选者
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Mar 7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09305-z.
6
Total lesion glycolysis of primary tumor and lymphnodes is a strong predictor for development of distant metastases in oropharyngeal carcinoma patients with independent validation in automatically delineated lesions.原发肿瘤和淋巴结的总病变糖酵解是口咽癌患者远处转移发生的有力预测指标,在自动勾画的病变中得到了独立验证。
Cancer Imaging. 2025 Feb 21;25(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00836-6.
接受检查点抑制剂治疗的头颈部黏膜鳞状细胞癌患者的结局。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct 1;148(10):918-926. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.2284.
4
Discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) above 18 months of treatment in real-life patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): INTEPI, a multicentric retrospective study.免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗超过 18 个月后在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)真实世界患者中的停药:INTEPI,一项多中心回顾性研究。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022 Jul;71(7):1719-1731. doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-03114-z. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
5
Immune-related adverse events are associated with improved response, progression-free survival, and overall survival for patients with head and neck cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.免疫相关不良反应与接受免疫检查点抑制剂的头颈部癌症患者的反应改善、无进展生存期和总生存期相关。
Cancer. 2021 Dec 15;127(24):4565-4573. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33780. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
6
Considerations for treatment duration in responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors.考虑免疫检查点抑制剂应答者的治疗持续时间。
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Mar;9(3). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001901.
7
Clinical outcome in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer patients after discontinuation of nivolumab monotherapy due to immune-related adverse events.由于免疫相关不良反应而停用纳武利尤单抗单药治疗后复发和/或转移性头颈部癌症患者的临床结局。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2020 Dec;140(12):1043-1048. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2020.1807601. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge After Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Cancer.癌症患者发生免疫相关不良反应后免疫检查点抑制剂的再次挑战
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jun 1;6(6):865-871. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0726.
9
Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.帕博利珠单抗单药或联合化疗对比西妥昔单抗联合化疗用于治疗复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(KEYNOTE-048):一项随机、开放标签、III 期研究。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 23;394(10212):1915-1928. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32591-7. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
10
Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.帕博利珠单抗对比甲氨蝶呤、多西他赛或西妥昔单抗用于治疗复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(KEYNOTE-040):一项随机、开放标签、III 期研究。
Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):156-167. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31999-8. Epub 2018 Nov 30.