Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Scanning. 2021 Oct 14;2021:8726388. doi: 10.1155/2021/8726388. eCollection 2021.
This study evaluated the effects of different final irrigation regimens on the dentin tubule penetration of three different root canal sealers using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). A total of 160 single-rooted extracted mandibular premolar teeth were divided into five groups ( = 32 each) according to the solution used in the final rinse protocol, as follows: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (group 1), 17% EDTA and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) (group 2), 7% maleic acid (MA) (group 3), 7% MA and 2% CHX (group 4), and 5.25% NaOCl (group 5). Two roots from each group were examined under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to visualize smear layer removal. Experimental groups were then split randomly into three subgroups ( = 10) and obturated using a cold lateral condensation technique with 0.1% rhodamine B-labelled sealers [either AH Plus (group A), EndoREZ (group E), or Tech BioSealer Endo (group T)] and gutta-percha. Specimens were sectioned and observed by CLSM to evaluate the percentage and maximum depth of sealer penetration at the apical, middle, and coronal levels. Statistical comparison was performed on grouped (apical, middle, and coronal segments) and ungrouped data using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test ( < 0.01). AH Plus showed the greatest tubule penetration while Tech BioSealer Endo showed the least. Resin-based sealers displayed deeper and more consistent penetration. CHX irrigation positively influenced sealer tubule penetration.
本研究采用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)评估了三种不同根管封闭剂在不同最终冲洗方案下对牙本质小管渗透性的影响。根据最终冲洗方案中使用的溶液,将 160 颗下颌前磨牙分为五组(每组 32 颗),如下所示:17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)(组 1)、17% EDTA 和 2%洗必泰(CHX)(组 2)、7%马来酸(MA)(组 3)、7% MA 和 2% CHX(组 4)以及 5.25%次氯酸钠(组 5)。每组中的两根牙齿用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查以观察清除玷污层的情况。然后将实验组随机分为三组(每组 10 根),用冷侧方加压技术用 0.1%罗丹明 B 标记的封闭剂[AH Plus(组 A)、EndoREZ(组 E)或 Tech BioSealer Endo(组 T)]和牙胶进行填充。对样本进行切片并用 CLSM 观察,以评估根尖、中部和冠部三个水平的封闭剂渗透百分比和最大深度。采用双向方差分析和 Bonferroni 事后检验( < 0.01)对分组(根尖、中部和冠部)和非分组数据进行统计比较。AH Plus 显示出最大的小管渗透性,而 Tech BioSealer Endo 则显示出最小的渗透性。树脂基封闭剂显示出更深和更一致的渗透性。CHX 冲洗可正向影响封闭剂的小管渗透性。