Suppr超能文献

N-乙酰半胱氨酸、马来酸和乙二胺四乙酸对环氧树脂类根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透深度影响的比较评价:一项共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究

Comparative evaluation of effect of N-acetyl cysteine, maleic acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid on the depth of dentinal tubule penetration of an epoxy resin-based root canal sealer: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study.

作者信息

Sunny Greeta, Doddwad Preeti Kore, Shenvi Suresh

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KLE University), Belgaum, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Apr;28(4):309-313. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_44_25. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective root canal irrigation removes the smear layer for optimal sealer penetration. While 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) is effective, concerns about dentin erosion exist. Alternatives like 7% maleic acid (MA) and 20% N-acetylcysteine (NAC) show promise with fewer adverse effects.

AIM

To compare the effects of 20% NAC, 7% MA, and 17% EDTA as final irrigating solutions on the depth of sealer penetration into dentinal tubules at coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root canals using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-six single-canal mandibular premolars free of caries, fractures, or prior treatment were selected. The teeth were decoronated to 14 mm root length using a diamond disk under water spray. Working length was determined by inserting a size 10 K-file until visible at the apical foramen, subtracting 1 mm. Root canals were instrumented up to F3 using ProTaper Universal rotary files with 1 mL of 2.5% NaOCl irrigation between files. Based on the final irrigation protocol, samples were divided into three groups ( = 22): Group 1-20% NAC, Group 2-7% MA, and Group 3-17% EDTA. Each group was irrigated with 5 mL of the respective irrigant, followed by a final rinse with 10 mL of distilled water. AH Plus sealer with 0.1% Rhodamine B was applied using a #25 Lentulo, and an F3 gutta-percha cone coated with the sealer was placed to working length, trimmed, and sealed with Cavit. Samples were incubated at 37°C and 100% humidity for 7 days to allow sealer setting. Roots were sectioned at 2, 5, and 8 mm from the apex to obtain 1 mm thick sections. Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules was evaluated using CLSM at ×10 magnification, measuring the penetration depth in micrometers from the canal wall to the point of maximum sealer infiltration using ImageJ software, measuring the longest penetration depth from the canal wall to the point of deepest sealer infiltration.

RESULTS

Sealer penetration was greatest in the coronal third, followed by the middle, with the least in the apical third ( < 0.0001). NAC demonstrated the highest mean in the coronal region (829.35 ± 85.36), while MA exhibited superior performance in the middle (522.92 ± 112.32) and apical (361.76 ± 49.03) regions. Intergroup comparisons showed superior penetration with 7% MA in the apical region ( < 0.0001). NAC and EDTA demonstrated comparable penetration across regions.

CONCLUSION

While all irrigants enhanced sealer penetration, 7% MA was most effective in the apical region. Both 7% MA and 20% NAC can serve as alternatives to 17% EDTA for final irrigation.

摘要

背景

有效的根管冲洗可去除玷污层,以实现最佳的封闭剂渗透。虽然17%的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)有效,但存在牙本质侵蚀的问题。7%马来酸(MA)和20%N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)等替代物显示出有前景的效果且副作用较少。

目的

使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)比较20%NAC、7%MA和17%EDTA作为最终冲洗液对根管冠部、中部和根尖三分之一处封闭剂渗入牙本质小管深度的影响。

材料与方法

选择66颗无龋、无骨折或未经先前治疗的单根管下颌前磨牙。使用喷水冷却的金刚石圆盘将牙齿截短至14mm根长。通过插入10号K锉直至在根尖孔可见,然后减去1mm来确定工作长度。使用ProTaper通用旋转锉将根管预备至F3,每根锉之间用1mL 2.5%次氯酸钠冲洗。根据最终冲洗方案,将样本分为三组(每组n = 22):第1组 - 20%NAC,第2组 - 7%MA,第3组 - 17%EDTA。每组用5mL相应的冲洗剂冲洗,然后用10mL蒸馏水进行最终冲洗。使用25号Lentulo输送含0.1%罗丹明B的AH Plus封闭剂,并将涂有封闭剂的F3牙胶尖放置到工作长度,修整并用Cavit封闭。样本在37°C和100%湿度下孵育7天以使封闭剂凝固。从根尖2mm、5mm和8mm处将牙根切片以获得1mm厚的切片。使用CLSM在10倍放大倍数下评估封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的情况,使用ImageJ软件测量从根管壁到封闭剂最大渗入点的渗透深度(以微米为单位),测量从根管壁到封闭剂最深渗入点的最长渗透深度。

结果

封闭剂渗透在冠部三分之一处最大,其次是中部,根尖三分之一处最小(P < 0.0001)。NAC在冠部区域的平均渗透深度最高(829.35 ± 85.36),而MA在中部(522.92 ± 第112.32)和根尖(361.76 ± 49.03)区域表现出更好的性能。组间比较显示7%MA在根尖区域的渗透更好(P < 0.0001)。NAC和EDTA在各区域的渗透情况相当。

结论

虽然所有冲洗剂都能增强封闭剂的渗透,但7%MA在根尖区域最有效。7%MA和20%NAC均可作为17%EDTA用于最终冲洗的替代物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e8d/12037131/88e3a9419d0e/JCDE-28-309-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验